Tag Archive: U.N.

Speculation? Second guessing? Accusations of Trump being a neocon, a warmonger? Even some daring to compare him to Hitler? Take a hard look at the cost of freedom.  10,000 of our own were lost at Normandy.  We fought to annihilate a dire threat, to prevent it from ever being posed again. To decisively end it.

We didn’t fight to satisfy a “status quo”, to “win hearts and minds”, or be culturally correct.  Our troops were not hamstrung by fallacious, self destructive “rules of engagement”.

If we retained that mindset, and not cow towed to the U.N. in 1950, Korea would have been made a free country.  That “police action” cost us 33,600 killed in action.  More than 8,100 are still missing.  Exact statistics vary with different sources; from Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_military_casualties_of_war

The threats we face today do not deserve one drop of American blood, for the sake of a “status quo”.  War is a last resort; and only when there is a clear, direct threat to us.  Moreover, this enemy will use any means to win; there are no clear battle lines, their guerilla tactics call for an entirely different approach.  Any of them, age notwithstanding can be a combatant.  When not warring with us, they are at war with themselves.  They seek to destroy our culture and replace it with theirs.  We shouldn’t be drawn into Syria, or other middle east involvement.  We’ve lost too many of our own, and spent too much.

Remember –


10 Reasons to Abolish the UN

Many thanks to Wil [Swiss Defence League]

“When the United Nations began deliberation on the Palestinian Authority’s demand for a unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state, it ignored the fact that the Gaza half of that proposed state is ruled by a group, Hamas, that has called for the destruction of Israel and a genocide against the Jewish people. This event, Daniel Greenfield writes in this searing pamphlet, remind us once again that the UN is “a democracy of tyrants” that has long since turned its back on the ideals present at its founding. In 10 Reasons to Abolish the UN, Greenfield shows why the “world body” has become a theatre of the absurd in which injustice flourishes. From failing to prevent outbreaks of genocide across the globe, to creating a rancid regimen of double standards that obsessively condemns Israel, while allowing countries such as Syria and Cuba to head its Human Rights Commission, the UN has become part of the problem rather than part of the solution.”

Popular Highlights

&quote;During the Cambodian Genocide, the UN Security Council did not issue a single resolution on it. &quote;

Highlighted by 4 Kindle users

&quote;Every tyranny is equally represented at the UN. Every king, dictator, sheikh, colonel, prince, beloved leader and president-for-life has a seat at the table. And since there are twice as many tyrannical states as there are full democracies, simple majority rule always favors tyranny. &quote;

Highlighted by 4 Kindle users

&quote;The United Nation’s obsession with Israel has been extensively documented, yet a session in which a servant of Saddam and the protégé of a Nazi war criminal, Kurt Waldheim, declared that Israel was unfit to be a member of the community of nations, was more than a scene of memorable ugliness. It was a reminder of what the organization is and what it is not. &quote;

Highlighted by 3 Kindle users

&quote;The United Nations has only called ten emergency sessions. Five of them have targeted Israel. &quote;

falling america1


How many  missiles have been sent into Israel from the land they gave up for “peace”?

On the heels of the successful campaign and reelection of Benjamin Netanyahu, The World Post posted a column by Palestinian journalist Daoud Kuttab; titled “World No Longer Bound to Defend Israel Internationally”  Source –  huffingtonpost.com

Right…  As if they ever did.  Israel alone has defended not only itself, but the west as well; One example, the neutralizing of Iraq’s Nuclear Accelerator:

“By 1979, Jafar became Vice Chairman of the Iraq Atomic Energy Commission and was responsible for dealing with the Iraq’s calutron program French on Osirak, the French nuclear reactor under construction in Iraq. On April 7, 1979, two days before a pair of reactor cores were to be shipped to Iraq, seven Israeli agents broke into a warehouse in the port of La Seyne-sur-Mer, near Toulon, and blew them up. On June 13, 1980, an Egyptian chemist hired by Iraq to work on spent fuel reprocessing was killed in Saclay were he had been sent for training. On August 7, 1980, the office of the Italian firm that supplied plutonium reprocessing technology to the Iraqis, was bombed. Finally, on June 7, 1981, Israeli aircrafts dropped several bombs on Osirak, scoring enough hits to permanently knock out the reactor.

The destruction of Osirak is certainly the first deliberate act of “counter-proliferation”,  and the event that must have given priority to uranium enrichment over plutonium production in Iraq’s nuclear weapons program.  The assertion put forward by most analysts, i.e. that Iraq’s calutron effort started after the bombing of Osiraq, is not plausible. In common with all other nations with nuclear weapon ambitions, all possible options for either producing plutonium or enriching uranium must have been studied right from the beginning.”   http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Iraq/andre/ISRI-95-03.pdf

Where was the “international community” then?  Nobody had the courage to face them down; they were the same gutless wonders that they remain today.  It took the Israelis, in a surgical air strike so as to avoid civilian casualties, to knock it out.

The feeble two state solution, is no real solution at all. It calls for pre 1967 borders, which were a prescription for disaster, being virtually indefensible from enemy attack.  During the six day war, (stopped only by the same impotent “international community”)  Israel, who could have marched straight into Cairo, had gained the Sinai Peninsula,  Gaza Strip, the Golan Heights (from which Syria could attack) and the West Bank.

They gave up the Sinai in a peace pact, signed on March 26, 1979, with a sincere (!) Anwar Sadat; who, for his trouble, was assassinated in 1981, to be replaced by a not so friendly regime.  Now their main defensible buffer zone was gone. Israel has continued to give up land for peace; their reward?  More attacks much closer to home, and until the recent elections continued to support the less than equitable two state “solution”.

“The Hamas Charter since 1988 has always called for the total destruction of Israel. Israel wants to ensure peace for their citizens–Jewish, Arab and Christian alike. This story is not new. In August of 2005, Israel gave back Gaza to the Palestinians and got missiles and war in return.
As long as Palestinian schools leave Israel off their maps, their TV ads promote and justify suicide attacks, and their charter supports the total destruction of Israel, there’ll be no peace. Hamas does not want a two-state solution. They want a one-state solution. They want Israel gone.”  Source – Land for peace?

The so-called “international community” has now had a taste of what little Israel, not much larger than the state of New Jersey,  endured from its inception – a relentless attack from its Islamic neighbors, bent on its destruction.

Here is a geographic perspective:



And a further look:


Said “international community” has never succeeded in preventing further terror attacks by militant Islamic groups, nor has Israel’s willingness to trade land for peace produced anything but further assaults.  Palestinians have two governments:

Fatah, which supports negotiating for a two-state solution, and Hamas, which opposes direct talks and instead uses mass terrorism as a means to pursue its self-proclaimed goal of destroying Israel.   Source – What is the two state solution?

May as well admit that Hamas rules, and leave it at that.

Islamics will never, NEVER rest until Israel is destroyed. Attempting to make peace with them is as deluded as Neville Chamberlain returning from Nazi Germany, claiming “peace for our time” with the useless document signed by Adolph Hitler.





      Charles Payne
Charles Payne [Why this is under Townhall Finance…]
Charles V. Payne is a regular contributor to the Fox Business and Fox News Networks. In addition, he continually provides opinions on the market to scores of prestigious news organizations such as Reuters, Wall Street Journal, and the New York Times and has been the keynote speaker at many investment conferences worldwide.  Charles is also the Chief Executive Officer and Principle Analyst of Wall Street Strategies, Inc. (WSSI), which he founded in 1991. With less than $10,000.00 in start up capital and working from his apartment, he launched WSSI to provide a unique brand of stock market advice. Through this service, subscribers (money managers and individual investors) began to reap sizeable profits and the firm developed a national reputation as provider of timely and effective equity analysis. Today, WSSI provides information to over 30,000 subscribers, in more than 60 countries as well as several of the largest bank/brokerage firms. Charles Payne oversees a team of stock analysts who cover specific industry groups, in addition to monitoring the entire market and individual sectors on his own.

There is a serious push to junk the US Constitution, and it’s not going away anytime soon. It’s scary to think, but the same approach for legalizing pot and for pushing immigration is being used. Chip away with a subtle approach aided by some folks on the fringe, then make the circle tighter and tighter. I saw an ad for a new television show that teased something about the Constitution keeping up with the times. This is a favorite approach, the notion the Founding Fathers couldn’t fathom cell phones and machine guns, so this “old piece of paper” is a relic.

The one thing we know has never changed and never will is human behavior. The Constitution provides checks and balances that protect against the worst instincts of checks and balances. And while key players were also slave-owners, it doesn’t make the document void or less valid, it just means these men had flaws. The point is that over the next three years you will witness that all the surface battles will really be proxies for an even bigger prize-a new constitution based on universal laws (read United Nations) coupled with natural laws (read pagan)- that focuses on a Voltaire-like nation of fairness.

Typically, when there is an attempt to junk something as vital and important as the Constitution is to the United States, opponents look for that major event to drive home change.

Many thought it would be Newtown but that didn’t work, although now inner city politicians can blame gun owners in the suburbs or different states for young people in their own districts slaughtering each other. Hollywood can tweet about the evils of guns even as violence has not taken a week break in their world. The critics have their platforms but missed badly on their attempts to use a senseless slaughter of innocents, and now they want to claim blood is on everyone’s hands who believe in the Second Amendment.

New Battle Ground
There have been few people as excited about 3-D printing as I have been. I simply think it’s the most revolutionary thing in more than a decade. But, what if this burgeoning technology gets caught in the crosshairs (pun intended) of the battle to destroy the Constitution? Apparently, there’s an outfit that claims it’s perfected the 3-D printed plastic handgun and will release instructions over the internet this week. They’re calling the gun “The Liberator” and it could up-end a lot of things and make the fight over so-called gun control moot.

It certainly bears watching for all its implications. I must say there is hype that one day an entire airplane could be printed, so a handgun would be child’s play. Of course, that’s a frightening thought, but it might happen even if those rights, now guaranteed in the Constitution, are stripped or the entire document is junked or rewritten.
Here’s the website for more information: http://defdist.org/

The Prudent See Danger

constitution-burning-340x225 - Copy

The Prudent See Danger

 The government is lying, the media is misdirecting, and for the most part – the church is avoiding the subject when they should be exposing and confonting the lies.

Ephesians 5:11 – “Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them.”

What is the government lying about? Most people are focused on them vs us sort of lies represented by partisan politics.  Obama lies. Bush lies. Romney Lies. etc. There are lots of  well documented lies of US Presidents and politicians. But those lies are just the tip of the iceberg. “What if” the fabric of lies and misrepresentation is much broader and it is bi-partisan and pervasive. What if the entire political landscape is intended to keep us divided and to distract us from what is going on behind the scenes?

Watch as Judge Napolitano asked such penetrating questions about government’s lies that his speech went viral and promptly got him fired from a major cable network.

What does the media not want us to understand?

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National auto determination practiced in past centuries”–David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991

What critical subject is the mainstream church avoiding and why?

“Christian’s in America are very naïve, they have little or no understanding of the realities of history. What happened in Nazi Germany, can easily happen here. In fact, there are many disturbing parallels between what is happening here economically, theologically and politically and what happened during the Weimar Republic.”

“This is how it will play out. You are beginning to see very quickly two kinds of Christians emerge in the United States and Europe. First, you will see an “Emergent Church,” that goes with the flow of humanistic secularism. In Nazi Germany, the term “Emerging Theology” was a term that was actually used. This will become the State approved Church, like the one Hitler approved of in Germany and currently exists in China. This type of Christian Church will be approved by a totalitarian state because it will empower that state through its complicity. Secondly, you will have the true Bible believing Church that will be persecuted because it stands for Biblical truth. This true Church will largely be driven underground as it is in China.”

“It is absolutely crucial that we perceive current events through the lens of Scripture. The Bible is very clear about what is going to happen in the last days. There will be a one world economic system, a one world government and a one world religion. All of that “Beast” system is emerging before our very eyes.” Paul McGuire

The stage has been masterfully set for the great falling away.

Mt 24: 12 “Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold, 13 but the one who stands firm to the end will be saved.”

Some Christians, will turn in their faith, integrity, and theology for peace, provision, and power. The vatican has already endorsed the UN as the best organization to rule the world and gave them an “indulgence” to do the dirty and difficult work that must be done.  Many American Christians are counting on a pre-tribulational rapture to save them from suffering even though 1) Many Christians around the world are suffering persecution now and 2) throughought the ages Christians have suffered persecution repeatedly and regularly and 3) Jesus has explicitly warned his disciples that they would suffer tribulation.

John 16:33 “I have said these things to you, that in me you may have peace. In the world you will have tribulation. But take heart; I have overcome the world.”

God has prepared a plan that the Church would be the light of the world, and that it will shine brightest in the midst of utter darkness. It is during this coming dark age, that the bride of Christ should be dressed in glory for the return of her bridegroom. We want to be like the wise virgins from the parable of the bridegroom in Matthew 25.

Matthew 25: 1“At that time the kingdom of heaven will be like ten virgins who took their lamps and went out to meet the bridegroom. Five of them were foolish and five were wise. The foolish ones took their lamps but did not take any oil with them. The wise ones, however, took oil in jars along with their lamps. The bridegroom was a long time in coming, and they all became drowsy and fell asleep.

Having Done All, Stand When people are confonted with new information and they become aware of imminent risk and mortal danger such as the threat of starvation and tyrrany, it is easy and natural to go straight into a fight or flight response. Some people wake up and then focus entirely on survivalism as the end goal. Self-reliance and Self-defense  are valid components of a prudent strategy, but not the primary focus of DurableFaith. Despite our discernment and best efforts, there will come a time for most of us when we will have done all and we simply need to take our final earthly stand of faith and not fall away.

My goal is to help believers and the church glorify God during the season he has placed us on the earth. This is our time. By understanding the times and preparing yourself spiritually and physically, you can make your Master proud when He does indeed find Faith on the Earth upon His return.

Spiritual preparedness involves prayer, sanctification, wrestling with ethical and lifestyle issues you may not have considered before. Physical preparedness will require honest risk assesment and prudent preparedness. Being a prudent christian prepper puts you in the good company of Noah, Joseph, and yes even Paul the apostle.

If this is new and difficult information for you Click follow at the top left to get updates. Bookmark the page and come back from time to time to learn more. Keep in mind that it is going to take time to deal with the information and the emotions that come up as you learn more. There is a natural grieving process that you may experience as you realize you have been lied to and that your current way of life offers very little protection against the days ahead.

Pace yourself, take the learning in stages and be encouraged that God has the answer to the question you are asking in your heart, “How then shall we live?”.

Durable –Matthew 10:22 and you will be hated by all for my name’s sake.  But the one who endures to the end will be saved.

Faith – Luke 18:8  However, when the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on the earth?”

Prepares – Proverbs 22:3 The prudent sees danger and hides himself, but the simple go on and suffer for it.



Leave Our Guns Alone ~ No UN Treaty, No Infringement

in Email Featured, JMM  articles / by Rebecca Figone / on March 29, 2013


There is no end to the lengths our current administration will go to, in  order to regulate guns.  To be sure, what we thought was dormant, the UN arms  control treaty, is now being touted, yet again.  Obama is actually pushing for  it, as is his new doormat, Secretary of State, John Kerry.  Please see more  about this, at Fox News.   http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/03/28/buyers-beware-un-arms-trade-treaty-will-regulate-individual-gun-ownership/ Of course, we have to hope that the Senate has more sense than to ratify the  treaty, but when considering the Senate, at this juncture, there is room for  doubt, as to their allegiance. As I was digging today through quotes for  something else I was seeking, I stumbled onto a few that speak to this issue.  I  will share them and their sources, with you below.

“I say the same as to the opinion of those who consider the grant of the  treaty making power as boundless. If it is, then we have no Constitution.”  (Thomas Jefferson, a letter to Wilson Cary Nicholas The Works of Thomas  Jefferson, September 7, 1803.)

“By the general power to make treaties, the Constitution must have intended  to comprehend only those objects which are usually regulated by treaty, and  cannot be otherwise regulated. It must have meant to except out of those the  rights reserved to the states; for surely the President and Senate cannot do by  treaty what the whole government is interdicted from doing in any way.” (Thomas  Jefferson, A Manual of Parliamentary Practice, p. 110. 1873.)

“The only constitutional exception to the power of making treaties is, that  it shall not change the Constitution.… On natural principles, a treaty, which  should manifestly betray or sacrifice primary interests of the state, would be  null.” (Alexander Hamilton, The Works of Alexander Hamilton, 1796.)

“That the treaty power is unlimited and omnipotent and may be used to  override the Constitution and Bill of Rights,” said Holman, is “a doctrine of  recent origin.…” (President of the American Bar Association Frank E. Holman,  began a campaign in earnest to protect the rights of Americans from treaty law  1948.)

“[T]hough the [treaty] power is thus general and unrestricted, it is not to  be so construed as to destroy the fundamental laws of the state. A power given  by the Constitution cannot be construed to authorize a destruction of other  powers given in the same instrument.… A treaty to change the organization of the  Government, or to annihilate its sovereignty, to overturn its republican form,  or to deprive it of its constitutional powers, would be void; because it would  destroy what it was designed merely to fulfill, the will of the people.”  (Supreme Court Chief Justice Joseph Story, Limitations on the Treaty-Making  Power (5th ed. 1891), Commentaries on the Constitution, Section 1508, original  source, the Commentaries on the Constitution, written by Chief Justice Joseph  Story in 1833.)

“I do not conceive that power is given to the President and Senate to  dismember the empire, or to alienate any great, essential right. I do not think  the whole legislative authority have this power. The exercise of the power must  be consistent with the object of the delegation.” (James Madison, Debate in  Virginia Ratifying Convention, Elliot 3:499-515. June 18, 1788.)

As I sit and ponder what happens in a nation that is deprived of its rights,  I am given pause, as historically, the peoples of those nations are subverted  and become slaves to the state or casualties.  Our nation was founded on the  idea of freedom and liberty. It was founded on the idea of self reliance and  self governance of the individual sovereign. The Bill of Rights is essential to  the stability of our sovereignty.

“§ 981. In the next place, a bill of rights may be important, even when it  goes beyond powers supposed to be granted. It is not always possible to foresee  the extent of the actual reach of certain powers, which are given in general  terms. They may be construed to extend (and perhaps fairly) to certain classes  of cases, which did not at first appear to be within them. A bill of rights,  then, operates, as a guard upon any extravagant or undue extention of such  powers. Besides; (as has been justly remarked,) a bill of rights is of real  efficiency in controlling the excesses of party spirit. It serves to guide, and  enlighten public opinion, and to render it more quick to detect, and more  resolute to resist, attempts to disturb private rights. It requires more than  ordinary hardihood and audacity of character, to trample down principles, which  our ancestors have consecrated with reverence; which we have imbibed in our  early education; which recommend themselves to the judgment of the world by  their truth and simplicity; and which are constantly placed before the eyes of  the people, accompanied with the imposing force and solemnity of a  constitutional sanction. Bills of rights are a part of the muniments of freemen,  showing their title to protection; and they become of increased value, when  placed under the protection of an independent judiciary instituted, as the  appropriate guardian of the public and private rights of the citizens.” (CHAPTER  XLIV. § 981, AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION., by Justice Joseph Story,  Cambridge, January, 1833.)

It is with this last quote, that I will close.  Let the words of Chief  Justice Joseph Story make you think, and may they also ring true forevermore. To  infringe upon our right to bear arms, would be the undoing of everything else we  all hold dear. The time to reach out to your Legislators is now.  No  ratification on this treaty and no infringement on our rights to bear arms, is  what we must demand.

“The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered,  as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral  check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally,  even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist  and triumph over them.” ~ Justice Joseph Story; Commentaries on the Constitution  of the United States, 1833

Read more: http://janmorganmedia.com/2013/03/leave-our-guns-alone-no-un-treaty-no-infringement/#ixzz2P1S2NMfa

From this site – As regards National Security:



In a world full of puny minds there occasionally emerges a great thinker. One such man was Sir Winston Churchill. From his book “The Gathering Storm” we are the beneficiaries of his wisdom for from that book we read:

“Still, if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you have to fight with all of the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worst case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory for it is better to perish than to live as slaves.” -Winston Churchill

At the end of this essay in Suggested Reading there is a video entitled “England warns Americans ‘Don’t let them take your guns'” It is nine minutes and nine seconds long … Time well spent.

The people of the UK know full well the grave error they committed in giving up their weapons to a “benevolent” government. The people of Australia along with every other nation who have willingly surrendered their guns have also learned the error of their foolish ways, and live in a constant state of fear, both from their government and the criminal elements of society.

We, the world’s very last bastion of liberty, will soon be called upon to do the same, and so many will comply. Odd it is how those so called “benevolent” governments strike fear in the hearts of men, and the fear we feel now is but a trifle compared to the future with Americans deprived of a means to fight back against an ever encroaching tyranny.

Two of the great failings of all humanity is that they learn not from history, and few can see beyond their own comforts. This concept led another great thinker to coin the phrase “Those who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” -Benjamin Franklin

Well Mister Franklin, that is justice, as people always have the government they deserve.

Had the people of England heeded these words, history would have taken a different course, and the world would be a safer place to live. If instead of surrendering their weapons, they had taken those very weapons, joined with a million fellow citizens, marched on Parliament, and told their traitorous leaders “Take them if you dare!“, we would see a free and staunch people occupying the streets of London today.

Instead we see a government cowing before the ever growing mass of Muslims that openly threaten to destroy a culture built by far better men than they. We see people who protest, in vain, their domination by the United Nations, the European Union, and Islam that guarantees chaos, and we see the women of that fair nation falling victim to roving rape gangs. Place semi automatic pistols in the hands of those English ladies and soon there would be no rape gangs left.

No, the English did not do what they should have, and now they warn us not to follow in their footsteps, and yet many of us will. There was a time when we were referred to as the Silent Majority. Times change. We are no longer the majority but we are still silent. Many would dispute my findings with the argument that they post patriotic pictures on Facebook, along with the latest news about a creeping government control, and join in discussions about how we must fight back. That fight entails posting picture, sharing bad news, and posting the call to fight back on Facebook, like a dog chasing his tail. The fight will not begin until Americans get truly mad as hell and take to the streets, and that is not about to happen. They are stay at home Moms, stay at home Dads, and stay at home “Patriots”.

The liberals know how to fight, as do the Progressives, the unions, and the Marxists. They go boldly where timid conservatives fear to tread. They attack us daily and our response is to whine on Facebook and post more pictures. It is a good thing that the men as Valley Forge did not have an internet upon which to vent their rage. They were mad as hell, cold, and hungry. They crossed a frozen river, and with a battle plan of “Victory or Death” they did some serious ass kicking. Those men were real patriots and to their courage I pay homage.

In the opening of this essay I used the phrase “puny minds”. A prime example is pictured to the right. Any human being with but a semblance of common sense and even the vaguest knowledge of historical events knows full well what happens in any country once the people are denied to right to bear arms. She is no more than a well meaning idiot. I can say nothing better about her and all who believe as she does, but I will give this idiot the credit due. She is a fighter. She is on the streets while stay at home patriots are busy in their discussion rooms.

In a recent discourse I wrote of how the disarming of America would take place.  I shall briefly summarize those views here and then get to the utter futility of the existing self defense plans of conservatives.

We are all aware of the UN’s Small Arms Treaty they plan to shove down our throats. Meanwhile, in the wake of the Sandy Hook tragedy, many pro-gun legislators are changing sides, and some cities are offering cash rewards for any gun voluntarily surrendered by residents. Later certain weapons and high capacity magazines will become illegal, and prison terms as well as stiff fines will be the punishment for those caught with them. The day will come when all guns will be outlawed and that is when the full force of operation gun grab will come into effect.

Americans, out of fear, are developing home armories and that is fine as far as protecting your family from intruders but you cannot defend yourself against a full on assault by the state or federal government intent upon disarming you.

 The photo to the left is of what is officially called a Special Response Armored Vehicle. It is the property of the Pittsfield Police Department in the liberal state of Massachusetts. These people mean business. The price tag for this behemoth was $294,000. Brief description: Bullet proof glass, armor plated and it comes complete with an attachable battering ram for knocking down doors. The driver would then back off and the assault team emerges. Enough to mess up your whole day! I must ask what fort or castle they plan to attack in Massachusetts.

Now I know that you are sitting there looking at this sophisticated and expensive device designed to knock down doors and wondering how they could afford such an overgrown toy while, due to the financial crunch, they are having to reduce the size of police departments. The answer is quite simple. It was a gift to the loyal from none other than our friends at the Department of Homeland Security.

Western Massachusetts Police Chiefs Get First Look At Regional Special Response Armored Vehicle

Like that? Try this one: Dept. of Homeland Security Using Armored Vehicles For Training

 Now compare the two vehicles. Look at the height of the police and that makes the six foot mark somewhere near the top of the windshield. Check the DHS variety. The lower part of the hood is about six foot high. This is a massive weapon of war, designed for use in the USA.

OK, so that lays to rest any plans of a stay at home fight for liberty. Others, preppers by name, have opted for community farms or compounds where they will gather in time of strife. That will not be very wise. Recall if you will the fate of David Koresh and his band of followers in Waco. That episode began with a siege and ended in a manner we all know of. No group of isolated civilians can hope to withstand an assault by federal forces, and when those forces are intent on disarming all of America, there will be no time wasted on a siege. There will be one order to surrender, followed by an all out attack.

Today Americans face a serious problem: They still cling to the vision of Old America. Old America is dead, and this is the Obamanation. Laws, rights, votes, and the Constitution have been rendered irrelevant, just another bump in the road to transforming this land into a Marxist Utopia. Those who foolishly cling to old notions are a bump in the road for those who seriously plan to survive coming events. Those who are foolish enough to argue the legality or the Constitutionality of events will soon fall victim to those same events, for denial is the road to defeat.

I have now been writing for about three years on the internet and many of the doom and gloom predictions that I have made have come to pass. During that time I have received many comments on my work but one in particular comes to mind from the first reader who made the observation that I was an optimist, for no matter how gloomy the topic I would always end an essay on the high note that Americans would prevail. Now I am not so certain of that.

Obama being reelected for life changed much of the outlook and hope I had for this nation. While it is true that millions of Americans turned out to vote against Obama in a rigged election, I must say that appears to be about all that most are willing to do. We criticize the plantation mentality of the left, feeling obligated only to vote to get the Obama freebies. That is not all that they are willing to do. Had Obama been defeated they were fully prepared to set fire to our cities and turn this nation into a hell on earth.

The right lost and their response is to post pictures and notes on Facebook. This is not the mentality of a people who have the strength and courage to rebuild our homeland. This is symptomatic of a passive flock of sheep; another term we apply to the left. We all know that the election was rigged well in advance of the final blow. How much anger did you see on the streets of America? A few days of shock and the new topic was the election of 2016 when we would unseat Obama for certain. Only an abject fool can believe that Obama will ever step down. Dictators cannot afford to resign. If they did they would become targets of the next regime. Notice that Gaddafi is dead and Mubarak is rotting in prison.

Recently we had salt tossed into an open wound as Romney’s son admitted before the nation that his father did not want to win the election on which we pinned so much hope. My God! Betrayed yet again, and still there are those who will praise the man who sold them out.That attitude reveals some first rate conditioning and denial. Mark Twain once observed that it is far easier to fool someone than to convince them that they have been fooled; words from another man of wisdom. America waited for the election of 2010 and made but little headway, and then were scorned by the GOP.

America waited for the election of 2012 when we all should have learned something and acted accordingly. We did not. Now many wait for the election of 2016 where once again the carrot dangles teasing the gullible. We have waited too long and now we find ourselves backed into a corner and facing a do or die situation. I shall close with the final thought in the Churchill quote above. “You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory for it is better to perish than to live as slaves.”

Suggested Reading… England warns Americans ‘Don’t let them take your guns(Video) Know Thine Enemy … Sun Tsu The Art Of War by Sun Tsu The Book Class Warfare…Coming To The Streets Of America


The video contained in this post is elsewhere in my blog.  I cannot find a better case for the 2nd Amendment.  Every time I listen to it I become angry for her.  Every time some deranged person commits a crime like this, instead of recognizing our right to protect life and family, the anti gunners are right there to try to ban guns.  The government is in the process of signing off on an “international arms treaty” with the U.N.   To hell with that!  Support the 2nd Amendment.

Lambs Against Wolves | Real Science.



The Clockwork Conservative

All wound up about politics, history, culture... lots of stuff.


at the Re-Birth of America!

ON MY WATCH - the writings of SamHenry

A Writer's Take on Global and National Issues with Background Information and Humor As Needed

Once Written

A Political Blog

Welcome to the Right Central

Warning: Not your average conservative newsletter. Viewer discretion advised.


purveyor of space kablooie stories.

Truth in Palmyra

By Wally Fry

Truth and Shadows

Following the white rabbit

Pacific Paratrooper

This WordPress.com site is Pacific War era information


The best in WWII aviation history

BUNKERVILLE | God, Guns and Guts Comrades!

God, Guns and Guts Comrades!

Aces Flying High

An Aussie's travels to air shows, aviation museums and related events around the world, with a bit of aerospace history along the way!

Eyes on Europe & Middle East

Des regards croisés sur l'Europe et le Moyen Orient

Doc Baize

Give me liberty or give me death!



Chastisement 2014

He is ready to separate the chaff from the wheat with his winnowing fork


The Take Down Of America

The Dangers of Allah

Confused about Islam, Muslims, Taqiyya, Kitman, The Islamic State, and Sharia? I've spent 14 years studying these confused beings.  They are not at all what they want us to believe, especially those who are ruled by al Qaeda , ISIS and the Muslim Brotherhood as well as those who commit overt and covert Jihad while practicing Sharia tortures upon women

Treason Among Us

A blog by Guido Volante Author of "Treason Among Us; Secrets of the S.E.C."

The Counter Jihad Report

News ~ Resources ~ Activism


Documenting the Islamization of America

Digestible Politics

Politics Made Easy!

A Conservative Christian Man

Stand for Your Belief or it is Not a Belief but an Excuse

sharia unveiled

illuminating minds

We Moved > Go To:


%d bloggers like this: