Category: Free country?



Yes, that is an old movie – Drone technology has put a new twist on both surveillance, and privacy issues, NDAA has made us a de-facto police state, and the Muslim in the whitehouse has allowed Islamists to infiltrate government and the military, like a bad case of termites.  Now to find out that for two years, the FBI, U.S. Marshalls, and other law enforcement agencies have had a radar system that can see through the walls of your abode… the noose is tightening.


New police radars can ‘see’ inside homes

The judges expressed alarm that agents had used the new technology without a search warrant, warning that “the government’s warrantless use of such a powerful tool to search inside homes poses grave Fourth Amendment questions.”

At least 50 U.S. law enforcement agencies have secretly equipped their officers with radar devices that allow them to effectively peer through the walls of houses to see whether anyone is inside, a practice raising new concerns about the extent of government surveillance.

Those agencies, including the FBI and the U.S. Marshals Service, began deploying the radar systems more than two years ago with little notice to the courts and no public disclosure of when or how they would be used. The technology raises legal and privacy issues because the U.S. Supreme Court has said officers generally cannot use high-tech sensors to tell them about the inside of a person’s house without first obtaining a search warrant.

The radars work like finely tuned motion detectors, using radio waves to zero in on movements as slight as human breathing from a distance of more than 50 feet. They can detect whether anyone is inside of a house, where they are and whether they are moving.

Current and former federal officials say the information is critical for keeping officers safe if they need to storm buildings or rescue hostages. But privacy advocates and judges have nonetheless expressed concern about the circumstances in which law enforcement agencies may be using the radars — and the fact that they have so far done so without public scrutiny.

Post Continues on



Indifference, apathy, “I didn’t do anything wrong, why should I worry”…

Followers of my blog need only peruse the tabs “Big Brother” or “Free Country” to find other evidence as to why inaction makes you complicit in your own demise.  Remember (in view of recent developments) that the Department of Homeland Security went on a bullet buying spree; and these were said to be for training. Hollow points are NOT used for training.  Our supposed victories in the recent election proved how corrupt Boehner and others are by allowing another egregious bill to be passed, when it should have been shot down, despite the national debt being well over 18 Trillion dollars.


Second of two video from above author.

Regardless of where on this planet you live, and no matter what your nationality, the fact that the indefinite detention provisions of the NDAA are still on the books, should disturb you on a fundamental level. If not, give it three minutes.

The National Defense Authorization Act which was passed in 2012 and extended in 2013 and 2014, authorizes the U.S. military to arrest anyone, anywhere on the planet, to deny them access to a lawyer, and to detain them indefinitely without at trial. Furthermore the U.S. government claims the right to do all of this in secret.

The right to a fair trial, is gone, and without the right to a fair trial, you have no rights at all.

Of course some would argue that the NDAA only targets enemies of the United States, as if this somehow would make it ok, but that defense doesn’t hold water. (And by the way the NDAA does apply to U.S. citizens.)

It doesn’t matter who the law claims to target, and it doesn’t matter under what conditions the politicians claim it can be used. If you don’t have the right to a lawyer, and you don’t get your day in court, and if the government isn’t even obligated to disclose the fact that they dragged you from your house in the middle of the night, then who is going to make sure this isn’t abused? The soldiers? The politicians? Come on.

The power to make someone disappear without a trial is the power to make up any excuse that’s convenient. Evidence is only needed if you have to prove your case in court. That’s why we have courts.

The protections codified in the constitution were put there for a reason, but at this point it looks very much as if America is going to learn that lesson the hard way.

Land of the free right?

You can put your hand over your heart and celebrate something that no longer exists, or you can be honest with yourself.

That might be a bit painful. No one wants to believe that their kids are going to live under a military dictatorship. No one wants to see this coming. So most people put their head in the sand.

Those who don’t, always start with one question: What can we do?

The first thing you need to understand here is that our problem is psychological not material. You have the means to take your power. And you don’t need a set of specific instructions. You don’t need someone to hold your hand and explain your role. You don’t need someone to give you permission. What you need, is to turn off your tv, turn off your radio, put down the ipad, and ask yourself if you’re going to be able to look your grandchildren in the eyes and tell them honestly that you did everything in your power to turn this around.

Are you going to push this out of your mind because it’s uncomfortable, or are you going convert that discomfort into a driving force?

I’ll tell you this much: If that thought itches in the minds of enough people we’ll figure out a way to scratch it, and If that driven feeling is fully established in your heart, you’ll find a way to make it spread.

P.S. If you want a practical starting point to take action on the NDAA get in contact with the guys at People Against the NDAA. Dan Johnson (the founder) is one of those driven people who are making a difference.

Showdown in Nevada

Gary North

The Tea Party Economist

Helping you to get through the economic mine field in one piece.

Written by Gary North on April 16, 2014

Let’s begin with a map.




Here are some explanations.

The United States government has direct ownership of almost 650 million acres of land (2.63 million square kilometers) — nearly 30% of its total territory. These federal lands are used as military bases or testing grounds, nature parks and reserves and Indian reservations, or are leased to the private sector for commercial exploitation (e.g. forestry, mining, agriculture). They are managed by different administrations, such as the Bureau of Land Management, the US Forest Service, the US Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Park Service, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the US Department of Defense, the US Army Corps of Engineers, the US Bureau of Reclamation or the Tennessee Valley Authority.This map details the percentage of state territory owned by the federal government. The top 10 list of states with the highest percentage of federally owned land looks like this:

Nevada 84.5%
Alaska 69.1%
Utah 57.4%
Oregon 53.1%
Idaho 50.2%
Arizona 48.1%
California 45.3%
Wyoming 42.3%
New Mexico 41.8%
Colorado 36.6%
You can find this here.

The Bundy family is grazing its cattle on federal lands for free. It refuses to pay. This is a property rights case on the surface.

We need to get beneath the surface. The real problem can be seen on the maps. The federal government exercises ownership over land that it should not own.

If the federal government auctioned off this land to the highest bidders, using the money exclusively for paying off the federal debt, the nation would be a lot better off. But the government refuses to do this.

My hope is that this showdown in Nevada will raise this question: “If a private owner controlled access to the land, would the Bundy family work out a deal?” I think it would.

The BLM has lost the first round: in the media. It thought it could steal Bundy’s cattle and get away with it. The plan has backfired. The BLM has backed off in the name of protecting the public from violence. But when has that ever stopped the Feds? The BLM has backed off because it has become the villain in a range war. It has received enormous coverage. The public is generally on Bundy’s side.

This is one of those situations where those of us who like small civil government can take control of this issue. The issue is best seen in the maps.

The BLM will want revenge. YouTube will make this more difficult for the BLM to achieve.


Harry Reid says, “It’s not over.”

I hope he is right. It’s great PR for liberty.

Will the BLM raid Bundy’s home? It may. There are signs that it will. But the day of invisible raids is over. YouTube enables voters to impose counter-measures. The bureaucrats fear bad publicity, and a raid on Bundy’s home will produce overwhelmingly bad publicity for the BLM.

This is likely to escalate. If the ranchers avoid violence and use YouTube instead, they will win.


Grassfire Update:

The “Cattle Battle” in Nevada is still in the news, and Grassfire wants to make sure you get the full story. In case you didn’t get to read yesterday’s alert about what the mainstream media isn’t telling you, we’ve included it below. To take immediate action against Big Government oppression, overreach and tyranny, click here to sign the “America, Push Back!” petition now.

+  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +

April 16, 2014

On the surface, the “cattle battle” in Nevada might look like a simple, but volatile, dispute between a rancher and the federal government over land rights and grazing fees. That’s the “angle” a lot of mainstream media outlets are presenting to the American people. The “meat” of their reporting is simply that Cliven Bundy doesn’t want to pay his “fair share.”


But there’s much more to this story that you’re likely NOT being told.

In an article posted on Grassfire’s LibertyNEWS yesterday, Managing Director Eric Odom calls the media silence surrounding this story “stunning,” adding:

“We all know media, as a whole, generally ignores stories that eventually prove massive wrongdoing within the rank and file of federal government. That said, the blackout of the Nevada land showdown takes it to a completely different level.”

Odom found evidence that “America’s most powerful Senator may very well be right at the center of the Nevada land controversy” — Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV):

“(T)he government’s part in this fight appears to be fueled by corruption and profit. … The most likely scenario involves Harry Reid’s family, a Chinese green-energy company, the federal government and profit from ‘public land.'”

Through his research and reporting, Odom “connects the dots” between Sen. Reid, Reid’s son, a former Reid staffer who now heads the Bureau of Land Management, and China’s ENN Energy Group. Last week’s aggressive and brazen display by federal law enforcement in Nevada appears to have its roots in Big Government profiteering and cronyism.

+ + Join The Movement! Push Back Against Tyranny!

Grassfire’s question is: When will the American people say “Enough!” to Big Governnment oppression, overreach and tyranny? If you’ve reached your limit, now is the time to push back and take action!

Join the national PUSH BACK movement by taking immediate action to condemn the escalating oppression, overreach and tyranny by our federal government. Go here now to sign the “America, Push Back!” petition:


I originally posted this in Oct 2013; the (guess which) circuit court has now upheld the school officials, instead of defending the students. How about banning Cinco de Mayo?  “X”


Posted by Jimmy Z on February 28, 2014 at 8:00pm in General, Town Hall

In Northern California, just south of San Jose, a public school last year told students wearing US Flag shirts on Cinco de Mayo that they had to turn them inside out. They fears racial tension. The families sued and the godawful 9th Circuit Court upheld the school’s action. This of course prompted a great rant from yours truly, as you might expect. -Jz

Another Pan Admin, Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer Admin II, ran a similar post, containing this excerpt:

Court: School can ban US flag shirts for safety

— Feb. 27, 2014 7:21 PM EST


SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Officials at a Northern California high school acted appropriately when they ordered students wearing American flag T-shirts to turn the garments inside out during the Mexican heritage celebration Cinco de Mayo, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the officials’ concerns of racial violence outweighed students’ freedom of expression rights. Administrators feared the American-flag shirts would inflame the passions of Latino students celebrating the Mexican holiday. Live Oak High School, in the San Jose suburb of Morgan Hill, had a history of problems between white and Latino students on that day.

The unanimous three-judge panel said past problems gave school officials sufficient and justifiable reasons for their actions. The court said schools have wide latitude in curbing certain civil rights to ensure campus safety.


Associated Press.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

I purchased one of these from Patriot Depot.   If those school officials don’t like it, they can follow suit! “X”

Being unable to embed videos from WND, I took the video from YouTube.  The article is from WND.  I posted similar videos (Click on title to view post with additional posts “related” at bottom, which, for reasons unknown, can’t be seen under “Latest Entries”) I note that the posts change on subsequent views, this is WP not me.  Paste Kitty Werthmann in “search this site” box to see other videos about her talks on Socialism, tyranny, and gun control.  I don’t care how many times I have to put this in the public eye, in view of  our Rogue Gvernment, and NDAA, which has made us a de-facto police state.  Another reminder to all of those who still think “it can’t happen here”.  “X”


Hitler survivor tells Americans: ‘Buy more guns!’

Warns Nazi tyranny began with simple concessions

Published: 2 days ago

The government required people to register their guns, insisting it was for their own protection, a way of tracking down criminals that was supposed to cut down on crime.

In reality, however, it was merely a ruse to track down those patriots who might resist the coming tyranny.

So explains Kitty Werthmann in a speech going viral on the Internet, a story of her life in Austria right before the Nazi occupation of her home country in 1938. As she explains, her nation’s surrender to Nazi tyranny didn’t begin with the Anschluss, but with little steps like acquiescing to gun-control laws:

“Dictatorship didn’t happen overnight. I took five years, gradually, little by little, to escalate up to a dictatorship,” she said. “When the people fear the government, that’s tyranny. When the government fears the people, that’s you, that’s liberty. Keep your guns, keep your guns and buy more guns!”

(Editor’s note: The following video was not produced by WND and contains several spelling and grammatical errors in its text overlays)

Werthmann’s speech, delivered at the “Let Freedom Ring” tea-party rally in Woodstown, N.J., on June 28, 2011, has been frequently circulated via YouTube and other online channels for years, but picked up steam again after the National Rifle Association reposted it recently under the title “Hitler Survivor Condemns Gun Control.”

The clear implication in her speech is that modern-day Americans should beware gun-control laws that strip them of their ability to resist an overbearing government.

“In 1938, the media reported that Hitler rolled into Austria with tanks and guns and took us over. Not true at all,” she said. “The Austrian people elected Hitler by 98 percent of the vote, by means of the ballot box.

“You might ask, ‘How could a Christian nation … elect a monster like Hitler?’” she concinued. “The truth is, at the beginning Hitler didn’t look like or talk like a monster at all. He talked like an American politician.”

Heed the warnings of a former Hitler Youth member as well in Hilmar von Campe’s riveting book, “Defeating the Totalitarian Lie.”

Werthmann, who is president of the South Dakota Eagle Forum, opposes national identification cards with the same vehemence she opposes gun control, recalling how Germany’s National Socialists, known by the abbreviation “Nazis,” used the innocuous-sounding initiatives to crush individual liberties during the World War II era.

“I lived in Austria under Adolf Hitler’s regime for seven years,” Werthmann writes on the Eagle Forum website. “Dictatorship did not happen overnight. It was a gradual process starting with national identification cards, which we had to carry with us at all times.

“We could not board a bus or train without our ID card,” she continues. “Gun registration followed, with a lot of talk about gun safety and hunting accidents. Since the government already knew who owned firearms, confiscation followed under threat of capital punishment.”

Now, Werthmann laments, “The liberal mindset in America has promoted gun control for a long time and is beginning to advocate national identification cards. Law-abiding American citizens should not have to carry national identification cards. … We have to protect our civil liberties. While some people need power to secure our freedom, we must be ever-vigilant to maintain a system of checks and balances.”

Her story of arrival in America in 1950, printed in South Dakota’s Argus Leader, reveals why the protection of individual liberty still remains so dear to her, now 64 years later.

“I was processed in New York. I stayed in a hotel the first night, and the next morning asked the concierge for directions to the nearest police station. I asked if it was in walking distance, and it was,” she recalls.

“I walked in and told the desk sergeant I wanted to register. He said,’What are you talking about?’ I said I wanted to register, so they’d know where I was. How would they find me if I broke the law? He said don’t worry, they’d find me. And then he said, ‘Lady, get the hell out of here.’

“I walked outside and it was a January day with a blue sky,” Werthmann recalls. “I looked up and said, ‘What kind of country is this?’ All of a sudden it dawned on me. It’s freedom.”

Flabbergasted  – adjective – Synonyms amazed, astonished, astounded, awestruck (also awestricken), bowled over, dumbfounded (also dumfounded), dumbstruck, flabbergasted, shocked, stunned, stupefied

My last two posts, led to this posting.  The Tea Party Economist – Secession and County Rights – (Gary North of Tea Party Economist) dealt with fledgling secession movements by counties.  He suggested that they use a slogan called county rights.  This is about freedom at the local level.  The article led me to American Vision’s county rights project – I posted several items directly from that site, which glared out at me like a neon sign.

Most of us are quite aware of the many issues we face at the national and global level.  That our basic freedoms are in dire jeopardy is old news.  Just as the need to correct  fraudulent voting -courtesy of the digitalization of the voting process- needs to be done at the local (precinct) level, many other personal rights are under attack.

I was stunned by the Federal Government’s intrusions of other rights concerning public lands, the resultant impact of local county economies, and the negative impact on people living in the areas affected.  This video is one eye-opening revelation of why we need to mobilize at the local level, and how local sheriffs can be the vanguard to reverse government tyranny.

The Travel Management Plan (watch the video) is a four letter word as far as our freedom is concerned; it exists if you have U.S. Forest Service lands or federal lands that are in the hands and managed by the Federal Government.

Bear in mind that the Federal Government owns nearly 650 million acres of land – almost 30 percent of the land area of the United States.

This hour long video is worth every second. This a great start to recovering localism. The model should be emulated and expanded upon in every county.

When  the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the  people, there is liberty. Thomas Jefferson


Find the federal lands in your state and county:

Thomas Manzano and his buddy had been out drinking for several hours when  they decided to crash at what they thought was the vacant apartment where  Thomas’s friend had been squatting. Thomas banged on the front door when he  couldn’t get in, and the tenant who lived there opened the door. It was 3  o’clock in the morning. The resident turned Manzano away, and Manzano threatened  the man before he closed the door on him. Obviously, it wasn’t the apartment  they thought it was. I guess at that point in their intoxication, they were very  easily confused, to say the least.

But Manzano didn’t give up. He decided to break in the apartment through a  bedroom window where the resident’s adult son was staying. Manzano threatened  and started to attack the man’s son, and when the resident heard the commotion  from another room, he grabbed his gun and hurried over to his son’s bedroom and  put 3 rounds in the drunk man. He was taken to the hospital and pronounced dead  shortly thereafter.

Manzano’s family is upset, saying that he was only confused and just made a  mistake. He didn’t deserve to die. Besides, he wasn’t even armed, so it wasn’t  fair. The drunk man’s Uncle Alfonso remarked, “Just because you have a gun and  its registered, doesn’t give you the right to kill somebody.”

The police are investigating this case as a homicide. Granted, homicide is a  broad term that refers to the killing of another person, whether justified or  not. But the district attorney will be deciding whether the resident’s shooting  and killing of the intruder was justified. NBC Los Angeles reported:

 “According to California law, citizens have  a right to protect themselves and their families, but there are conditions. ‘The  homeowner, the citizen, has to be able to articulate or apply the appropriate  amount of force that was done against them,’ Ontario [California] Police Sgt.  David McBride said. Police said Manzano was unarmed at the time of the  shooting.”

 I don’t really know what that police sergeant meant, but I think he  means that in this case, the apartment resident may have taken it too far,  because the intruder wasn’t armed. So, shooting and killing the man was not the  “appropriate amount of force” considering the minimal threat that Manzano  posed.

But there’s no way the resident could have known that Manzano posed  little threat to them. He even gave the man a chance to go away. And Manzano  decided to break and enter and then threaten and attack the man’s son. When you  do that, I don’t care how inebriated or “confused” you are, expect to be shot  at. Expect to die.

The gun-owner did the right thing. And let’s hope the district attorney and  prosecutor do the right thing and refuse to press any charge against the man for  defending himself and his son.

Read more:

Lousy digit violating (I’m angry – figure it out) suck ups are hard at work trying to smother the 1st amendment.  I blog, rant, and rave about Google, Facebook, and privacy. Here’s a “two-fer” on Anti-Christian, Anti Conservative censorship, and worse, possible civil rights charges:

Criticize Islam, Face Civil Rights Charges

And the next brick in the road to tyranny: A U.S. attorney in Tennessee says  that posting comments critical of Islam on Facebook and other  social media  could violate civil rights laws.

Translation: The Feds are monitoring your Internet postings and will soon be  targeting anyone who is anti-Islam, most of whom I’m guessing would be  Christians and Jews.

Hmm. Do you suppose that might even be conservative Christians and  Jews?

The pattern continues.

It’s a good thing that I and most of the folks who post here only post facts  about the only world religion to be founded by a warlord, and which is in  competition against the religion of atheism for the most people killed in its  name.

Bill Killian, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Tennessee, is  planning to hold a meeting next week sponsored by a local Muslim group.

“This is an educational effort with civil rights laws as they play into  freedom of religion and exercising freedom of religion,” Killian told the  Tullahoma News. “This is also to inform the public what federal laws are in  effect and what the consequences are.”

He said that Facebook comments that insult Islam and violate civil rights  laws are under federal jurisdicti0n. “That’s what everybody needs to  understand,” he said.

As justification, he brought up a posting by a Tennessee official that showed  a shotgun pointing at the camera with a caption that said, “How to wink at a  Muslim.”

“If a Muslim had posted ‘How to Wink at a Christian,’ could you imagine what  would have happened?” Killian said.

As a matter of fact, we can. Nothing would have happened, as always.

Because Islam is the Left’s partner of convenience in the destruction of  Christianity and Judaism.

Facebook is already complicit with the anti-conservative message. It isn’t  consistent, probably because it hasn’t gotten the legal all-clear yet, but  postings by conservatives have a way of disappearing from Facebook pages.

Folks – exactly how many time have I mentioned that Conservative and Christian pages routinely disappear from YouTube for so-called “repeated policy”, or “copyright” violations, while others who blatantly consist of  nothing but music videos remain?  Oh, and if you forgot, Google owns YouTube…

Just the other day, the up-and-coming rock group Madison Rising, which is  unabashedly conservative, had its star-spangled album cover blocked from  Facebook with no explanation.

Killian’s blather about Muslims’ civil rights should be taken as a warning  that the Obama Administration is going to take its war on conservatives to a new  front very soon.

Read more:

Judge Rules GOOGLE Must Comply With FBI’s Warrantless Requests

Saturday, June 1, 2013

FBI     A federal judge has ruled that Google must comply with the FBI’s warrantless  requests for confidential user data, despite the search company’s arguments that  the secret demands are illegal.

CNET has learned that U.S. District Judge Susan Illston in San Francisco  rejected Google’srequest  to modify or throw out 19 so-called National Security Letters, a  warrantless electronic  data-gathering technique used by the FBI that does not need a judge’s  approval. Her ruling came after a pair of top FBI officials, including an  assistant director, submitted classified affidavits.

The litigation taking place behind closed doors in Illston’s courtroom — a  closed-to-the-public hearing was held on May 10 — could set new ground rules  curbing the FBI’s warrantless access to information that Internet and other  companies hold on behalf of their users. The FBIissued 192,499  of the demands from 2003 to 2006, and 97 percent of NSLs include a mandatory gag  order.

Post Continues on

Read more:

The Ripening Wanderer

The Clockwork Conservative

All wound up about politics, history, culture... lots of stuff.


at the Re-Birth of America!

ON MY WATCH - the writings of SamHenry

A Writer's Take on Global and National Issues with Background Information and Humor As Needed

Once Written

A Political Blog

Welcome to the Right Central

Under Construction.

purveyor of space kablooie stories.

Truth in Palmyra

By Wally Fry

Truth and Shadows

Following the white rabbit

Pacific Paratrooper

This site is Pacific War era information


The best in WWII aviation history

BUNKERVILLE | God, Guns and Guts Comrades!

God, Guns and Guts Comrades!

Aces Flying High

An Aussie's travels to air shows, aviation museums and related events around the world, with a bit of aerospace history along the way!

Eyes on Europe & Middle East

Des regards croisés sur l'Europe et le Moyen Orient

Doc Baize

Give me liberty or give me death!



Chastisement 2014

He is ready to separate the chaff from the wheat with his winnowing fork


The Take Down Of America

The Dangers of Allah

Confused about Islam, Muslims, Taqiyya, Kitman, The Islamic State, and Sharia? I've spent 14 years studying these confused beings.  They are not at all what they want us to believe, especially those who are ruled by al Qaeda , ISIS and the Muslim Brotherhood as well as those who commit overt and covert Jihad while practicing Sharia tortures upon women

Treason Among Us

A blog by Guido Volante Author of "Treason Among Us; Secrets of the S.E.C."

The Counter Jihad Report

News ~ Resources ~ Activism

Documenting the Islamization of America

Digestible Politics

Politics Made Easy!

A Conservative Christian Man

Stand for Your Belief or it is Not a Belief but an Excuse

sharia unveiled

illuminating minds

We Moved > Go To:


%d bloggers like this: