Category: Islam


Above image from my archives – “X”

Courtesy of Gunny G.  (Link below excerpts)

“Two parents, obtained legal services to fight the school district over indoctrinating their children into the religion of Islam.”

“…this kind of indoctrination accelerates with endless Muslim refugee immigration.  Notice that London, England no longer enjoys being “British.”  But in fact, harbors a Muslim mayor who promotes Sharia Law.  London features 423 new mosques and 100 Sharia Courts.  Muslims create parallel societies in every country they invade.”

News With Views | Islam’s Not So Subtle Onslaught Into America

Migration as Jihad 

 

Interview with Dr. Bill Warner Ph.D — Israel, Islam and End Times

Israel, Islam and End Times

*                         *                         *

A personal observation reposted from an American Veteran’s blog:  [Note – Where “development”, or “history” are the appropriate words to use, I resent any form of the word “evolution”.  So I have made the needed correction; God is in charge, and Darwin’s damned theory is inappropriate.]

A Wake Up Call For Any American Who Gives A Damn!

Dateline: Hamtramck, Michigan

I have been reading the Hamtramck “Review” (A local newspaper serving Hamtramck, Michigan and I noted an article revealing a landmark shopping venue, The Polish Market, has announced their closing and is now history.

A sign on the property says that “Due to circumstances beyond our control we are forced to close.”

City leadership is lamenting the loss of the iconic shopping venue as “A loss for the city.”

Sounds like any other store closing brought on possibly be adverse financial circumstances at first look, doesn’t it?

I mean old, well-established and much-loved stores are closing every day in America and that is the way business in America has historically rolled, isn’t it?  Stores come and stores go.

But I believe there is an angle to this story that a lot of people are going to overlook or that isn’t going to get much play in the Press.

On reading a little further into the story, I discovered that the owner of the business had told the Hamtramck Director of Community and Economic Development that his store had been losing money every month …. with the demographic change in the city.”

With the demographic change in the city —– With the demographic change in the city —– With the demographic change in the city!

For decades Hamtramck had been known as a predominately Polish city.  But the hands of time have moved on and political correctness has become the order of the day and now Hamtramck’s majority population is ….. wait for it …. wait for it …. “Immigrants!”

And where are these majority of Hamtramck’s immigrants from?

They are from Bangladesh and Yemen — and Bosnia — and…  here is the kicker as far as I am concerned …   Most of these Hamtramck immigrants from Bangladesh, Yemen and Bosnia are of the …. Muslim …. faith.

Muslims!

Muslims now make up the majority of the demographic of once predominately Polish Hamtramck, Michigan and there are now reported to be at least a dozen other markets catering to that new Hamtramck demographic.

Some kind of unavoidable coincidence?

Or a pattern perhaps?

I do not know but I am going to assume that this demographic change was very slow and very subtle and that most of the original residents of Hamtramck probably had no idea of what was happening in their community — and if they did realize what was happening they probably had no voice in the development of that demographic change.

The question I have today is for my readers: “Does any of what I have just written look at all like anything that might be happening in the city, the town, the village, the hamlet, the neighborhood where you live?

I am going to venture a guess that this is a pattern that is spreading slowly across The United States and that before too much time has passed there are going to be a whole lot of Americans who will get blindsided by similar demographic changes in their own places of residence.

Is it a demographic change or is it a demographic replacement?

I ask, you decide!

Does it matter at all?

I would say that the question of whether it matters or not is a question for individuals to ask themselves because I do not think any concerns raised by individuals about such matters are going to receive very much attention from either the politically correct elitists in government or the press on their payrolls.

This is a question that everybody who reads this is going to have to resolve themselves.

How the Crusades Saved Europe

Courtesy of Swiss Defence League;  Comment below was made on that posting by author of Defense Issues:

“Crusades saved Europe from being conquered by the most lethal ideology in history – Islam. Unlike islamic jihad, Crusades were not offensive wars of conquest, nor they were religious extremism or fanaticism. They were a defensive response to a life-threatening situation.”

How the Crusades Saved Europe The Battle of Vienna, September Eleven 1683 (movie)

Source: How the Crusades Saved Europe

I found this just today. I don’t know whether she is still in office. I don’t want any more meddling in our elections.  They need to be out of our domestic affairs, DHS, Government and our military. Period.

Note the date this was posted:  November 23, 2010

There had better not be a “three-peat”.  Reposted in part; more HERE

Lema Bashir, Stealth Jihadist at Obama’s DoJ, Sabotaged/Disenfranchised the Military Vote?

By Pamela Geller on November 23, 2010

Increasingly the J in DoJ, points more to  jihad than to  justice.

Lema Bashir was at the center of Virginia failing to mail military ballots in time in 2008.  The same mistakes repeated in 2010 and United States military voters were heavily disenfranchised in 2010 because of in-actions by Bashir and DOJ throughout 2010. Disenfranchising the military vote is policy. You could make a case that bad mistakes were made in 2008 but that when those same mistakes are made and made worse in 2010 by a devout Muslim who calls Israel “northern Palestine,” I submit that it is no accident but deliberate policy.

 

Lema

Bashir is featured in this White House produced video about all the muslims in the executive branch.  Another hard sell Obama production of those whose interests clearly diverge from proud Americans. Obama was promoting on the White House website at the same time as his crippling submission speech to the ummah in Cairo (June ’09) Notice in the video she refers to Israel as “North Palestine.” Her family comes from there and she is militantly opposed to Israel.

Of the many astounding things about this video, one is the fact that the White House allowed it to go out with the supercharged term “North Palestine.”  Of course another amazing thing is what is this person doing with such a prominent role in “defending” the voting rights and strength of military voters???  Keep in mind that all through 2010, the Voting Section at DOJ had a IRAQ Navy Vet (Lt. Commander Sabatino Leo) and they refused to allow him to work on military voting cases.  Holder was even asked about this omission by Senator Sessions in an oversight hearing.  How does one explain the totally lackadaisical approach to military voting rights in 2010?

Previous to her seditious career at the Department of Justice, Lema Bashir was a  legal adviser with the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) in Washington, D.C. The ADC:

  • Opposes U.S. aid to Israel
  • Opposes ethnic profiling of Arab Americans
  • Supports Palestinian “martyrdom” campaigns in Israel

Lema Bashir, a legal adviser with the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) in Washington, D.C., said the group sees spikes in employment discrimination not only after events such as Sept. 11, but also when violence occurs in the Middle East, inflammatory stories appear in the media or even certain movies gain popularity.

[…]

In the years since the attacks, Bashir said, the types of complaints filed with the ADC have changed.

“The more common types of employment discrimination reported immediately after Sept. 11 were verbal and physical harassment, and termination because of race, religion or national origin,” Bashir said.

Fast forward to Barack Hussein Obama’s crusade to install devout Muslims in senior positions in his administration and all branches of government, enter Lema Bashir.

Bashir is very active in subversive, anti-American efforts:

CHRGJ at NYU Law: Racial Profiling and Counter-Terrorism

Lema Bashir at launch of report Americans on Hold: Profiling, Citizenship, and the “War on Terror” – yes, it’s an America bashign report by the usual suspects CAIR,

Disgrace: DOJ Fails to Protect Military Voting Rights PJM

In 2008, some 17,000 servicemen and servicewomen mailed home completed ballots that were never counted. The DOJ barely lifted a finger to prevent or prosecute this travesty. What will happen in 2010?

In the 2008 presidential election, 17,000 soldiers, sailors, and Marines mailed home completed ballots that were never counted.

Usually these ballots didn’t get home in time, mostly because they weren’t sent overseas early enough. One cause of this catastrophe is the Keystone Cops routine the Department of Justice Voting Section uses to enforce federal laws protecting the rights of military voters. Unfortunately, all signs point to a comic sequel in the upcoming November elections.

Congress tried to fix the problem last year by mandating that all ballots must be sent overseas at least 45 days before the election. But Military Voter Protection Project Director M. Eric Eversole has accused Justice Department officials of encouraging states to seek an exemption to the law. The law indeed grants states the right to ask the Pentagon to opt out of the law. Even worse, Eversole says the Department is telegraphing to states that it doesn’t want to pursue litigation to enforce the law.

Some voting rights are more important than others, it seems. Where have we heard this before?

Exemptions to the 45-day mailing mandate were supposed to be rare, and granted only for the most extreme emergencies. States had plenty of time to amend their laws to comply with the new 45-day window. Many states did nothing. Instead of aggressively enforcing the new protections, Justice has told states that the waiver provisions are ambiguous and encouraged waivers in numerous ways.

Senator John Cornyn, upon learning of the DOJ’s wobbly view of the new law, made it clear to the Pentagon in a recent meeting with Undersecretary Clifford Stanley that the Pentagon — which has the power to grant waivers — calls the shots. Cornyn’s message was the Pentagon should ignore any milquetoast attitudes emanating out of the Voting Section at Justice. Expect Senator Cornyn’s office to watch this issue like a hawk, which thankfully he is when it comes to military voting.

But Senator Cornyn has more reasons to worry than he knows. The investigative methods used by Justice in military voting matters are wholly inadequate. And even when the bureaucracy stumbles across violations, the Voting Section is timorous, and reluctant to aggressively litigate disenfranchisement of military voting rights.

One need only look at 2008 for proof. That year the Justice Department set up no telephone hotline for military voters to complain if they didn’t receive their ballot in time. No email address for the armed services was in use either. No outreach via military email, such as the daily “Early Bird,” took place. In fact, on the DOJ webpage devoted to military voting, all complaints are referred to the Pentagon. Naturally, after being detoured to the Pentagon, the aggrieved solider will learn the Pentagon has no enforcement power at all! Justice does.

[….] 

A document filed in the military voting case of McCain v. Cunningham makes plain the disinterested enforcement system at DOJ for military voters. In 2008, the McCain campaign learned that the Commonwealth of Virginia was sending ballots out far too late for them to ever be successfully returned before the election. The campaign responded by immediately commencing a lawsuit.

Think about that: the very day before a historic election, a presidential campaign — with the distracting whirlwind of activity and bustle — was able to do what the bureaucrats at DOJ are paid to do, and didn’t: figure out Virginia was breaking federal law and file a lawsuit.

An affidavit of Voting Section attorney Lema Bashir in the case tells you all you need to know about how ineffective the DOJ investigative methods are during election season. It can be read here.

[…]

“On September 30, 2008,” Bashir notes, “I spoke with Vickie Williams” at the Virginia State Board of Elections. Williams was in charge of monitoring the mailing of military ballots. You’ll note this conversation occurred only 35 days before the election.

Until Congress stepped in last year, the statute set no mailing deadline, and DOJ was only requiring ballots to be mailed 30 days in advance. The Military Postal Service Agency had recommended 60 days, but bureaucrats inside DOJ were stuck in their ways and refused to budge from the 30-day tradition despite calls from all quarters to do so. In a rebuke to the bureaucrats, the new law now requires 45 days.

And what was the extent of the DOJ’s efforts to figure out if the thousands of Virginians serving overseas had their ballots mailed in time? On September 30, “Ms. Williams assured me that all of Virginia’s localities had sent absentee ballots to all UOCAVA voters who had requested an absentee ballot up until that date. She told me that she would send a follow-up email to [the Pentagon] with the specific dates when each locality had mailed such ballots,” the affidavit states.

Ms. Williams assured that all was well. Except it wasn’t. Actually, many ballots in Virginia were mailed overseas just a couple of weeks before the election. There was no chance they would ever be returned in time to be counted.

On Halloween 2008, the DOJ learned they had gotten a trick courtesy of the Virginia State Board of Elections when Ms. Williams called back with some bad news. She told the DOJ that her system never really could “provide the information requested” such as “the specific dates when each locality in Virginia had mailed such ballots.” Nobody actually knew what was going on — not Virginia, and obviously not the Justice Department either. The election was just four days away and the witches brew of electoral catastrophe was boiling.

One wonders what was happening from September 30 until October 31. Will the DOJ use this same broken system again in 2010? I’d suggest the DOJ look outside the bureaucracy, to the private sector, where experts on systems management exist that can fix this mess and prevent it from happening again. Turning inward to the bureaucracy for answers is likely to yield the same sorry results. But I’ll bet virtually nothing changes because a bureaucrat’s first instinct is to deny that a problem exists.

On November 3, the day before the election, the McCain campaign — unable to convince the DOJ it needed to act, and fast — filed a lawsuit to protect military voters. And not until November 14, 2008, did the DOJ do what it should have done weeks before — file papers in court to protect Virginia voters serving overseas in the military. Eventually the United States took the place of the McCain campaign and litigated the case.

Remember, this same mess played out all over the country, but the whip-smart investigative methods of the DOJ never could detect it. Seventeen thousand trashed military ballots prove it.

Amazingly, the Virginia State Board of Elections (SBE) is continuing to advocate positions in the ongoing (yes, ongoing) litigation which are hostile to military voting rights. Those responsible for these disgraceful positions should be removed, or Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli should be allowed to assume management of the defense. Cuccinelli does not suffer fools gladly, particularly ones seeking to make it harder for soldiers and sailors to vote. No doubt he would settle the case immediately and agree to protect our servicemembers fully.

But the single Bashir affidavit, filed in the single military voting case arising out of the 2008 election where 17,000 military votes were trashed, tells you everything you need to know.

While our soldiers patrol dangerous frontiers in Korea and south Asia, looking hard for any signs of danger, the DOJ has a very different approach when it comes to detecting compliance by states with federal law. Airmen glued to radar screens and sailors listening hard to the sounds from towed sonar arrays have a right to expect better from bureaucrats in Washington. They put their lives on the line for us. The DOJ should do more than take the word of Vickie Williams at the Virginia SBE that all is well, all is quiet, no problems to report. And the DOJ should respond with overwhelming force when signs appear that states aren’t ready to comply with the new federal 45-day mailing mandate. Requests for waivers from the 45-day mandate should be denied. In fact, requests for waivers should trigger a DOJ investigation.

We owe these heroes no less.

 

I obtained this video from Swiss Defence League dated May 9th 2016; what is really dumbfounding is that this person, Mr. Pat Condell, is an avowed Atheist.  An articulate, satirical blast at what’s happening in Sweden; resulting from multiculturalism, and betrayal by their own government.

Courtesy of Swiss Defence League

Clinton and Trump: Where Do They Stand on Islamism?

Thu, May 5, 2016

Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump

Donald Trump is the all-but-declared Republican presidential nominee and Hillary Clinton on the cusp of winning the Democratic nomination. It is time for voters to begin weighing the national security consequences of each candidate’s potential administration.

You can read our full profiles of the candidates’ positions related to Islamist extremism by clicking here for Donald Trump and here for Hillary Clinton. Below is a summary of six policy areas where they differ:

 

Defining the Threat

Trump defines the enemy as “radical Islam.” Clinton defines it variably as “jihadism,” “radical Jihadism” “Islamists who are jihadists.”

 

Defeating the Ideology

Trump said in his foreign policy speech that “containing the spread of radical Islam must be a major foreign policy goal of the United States.” His policy proposals include a vague commitment to use the U.S. military more aggressively, deterring terrorists by killing their families, closing down the most radical mosques and banning Muslim immigration into the U.S. until the homeland is secure and an effective vetting process is established.

Trump is adamantly opposed to democracy-promotion and overthrowing regimes; instead, he favors alliances with authoritarian rulers who cooperate on counter-terrorism. He says, “our goal must be to defeat terrorists and promote stability, not radical change.”

He criticizes Clinton for supporting the overthrow of Saddam Hussein in Iraq, Muammar Gaddafi in Libya, Hosni Mubarak in Egypt and Bashar Assad in Syria. However, a reputable senior foreign policy adviser to Trump, Dr. Walid Phares, is an expert on combating the Islamist ideology and believes in promoting human rights and civil society.

Clinton’s national security platform calls for “defeating ISIS and global terrorism and the ideologies that drive it.” Her strategy emphasizes civil society and a foreign policy that promotes freedom, women’s rights, free markets, democracy and human rights, all if which she believes are necessary in order to “empower moderates and marginalize extremists.”

Clinton says the U.S. needs an “overarching strategy” to defeat the ideology like the U.S. used to win the Cold War. Clinton wants the State Department to better “tell our story” overseas by confronting anti-American propaganda via public engagement.

Clinton’s speech on foreign policy and ISIS also includes confronting state sponsors of extremism like Qatar and Saudi Arabia and identifying “the specific neighborhoods and villages, the prisons and schools, where recruitment happens in clusters, like the neighborhood in Brussels where the Paris attacks were planned.”

 

ISIS, Iraq and Syria

Trump says he will appoint effective generals who will quickly crush the Islamic State.  He believes the U.S. has “no choice” but to send 20-30,000 troops to fight the Islamic State. He would also attack the families of Islamic State members, bomb oil sites held by the Islamic State and then seize them for U.S. companies to rebuild and own.

He would not support Syrian rebels against the Iran-backed Assad regime; Trump supported Russia’s military intervention in Syria to save the dictatorship. Trump believes he can be a partner with Russian President Putin. He says he would establish safe-zones in Syria to stop the flow of refugees, but neighboring Arab countries like Saudi Arabia would have to pay for it.

Clinton’s speech on ISIS emphasized her opposition to a large ground campaign by U.S. forces, but she does support President Obama’s deployment of about 5,000 troops to Iraq with a limited role. She disagreed with President Obama when she urged U.S. support for Syrian rebels at the beginning of the civil war in order to prevent Islamist extremists from gaining ground.

Clinton also supported using the U.S. Air Force to implement a no-fly zone in Syria and to create safe zones for refugees. Clinton remains committed to ending the civil war in Syria by forcing Assad to resign from power as part of a political transition.

In Iraq, she favors direct U.S. military assistance to Sunni tribes and Kurdish forces fighting ISIS and expanding the U.S. forces’ role to include embedding personnel in local Iraqi units and assisting with airstrikes.

 

Iran

Trump would terminate the nuclear deal with Iran immediately and pledged to “dismantle” Iran’s global terrorism network in his speech about Israel and the Middle East. He supports placing severe sanctions on Iran to pressure them into a deal that dismantles their nuclear program and ends their support for terrorism.

Clinton supports the nuclear deal with reservations. She has released a 5-point plan to respond to the deal’s negative consequences, Iran’s sponsorship of terrorism and human rights abuses of the Iranian regime. She supports expanding sanctions on Iran for these actions.

Neither candidate has explicitly endorsed overthrowing the Iranian regime, but Clinton took a step in that direction  in 2010 when she said she hopes there will be “some effort inside Iran, by responsible civil and religious leaders, to take hold of the apparatus of the state.” She regrets that she and the Obama Administration did not more forcefully support the 2009 Green Revolution and promises “that won’t happen again.”

 

Muslim Brotherhood

Neither candidate has endorsed the Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act and concerns have been raised about both candidates’ advisers.

One of Clinton’s closest aides, Huma Abedin, was the assistant-editor of an Islamist journal with her family members, some of whom have Muslim Brotherhood links. She has not directly said anything extremist and is married to a pro-Israel Jew. Critics point out that although she has a security clearance, her familial ties may influence her advice to Clinton.

In her book, Clinton seems to understand that the Brotherhood is hostile to the U.S., deceptive and closely linked to Hamas. However, she seems to accept Islamist political parties like the Brotherhood as potential democratic partners. Her State Dept. operation in Egypt gave election training to Brotherhood members and a Clinton Foundation member belonged to the Brotherhood.

One of Trump’s top campaign aides, Paul Manafort, was a lobbyist for Saudi Arabia in the 1980s and a lobbyist for a Pakistani ISI intelligence front in the U.S. that was also closely linked to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Trump has never said anything kind about the Muslim Brotherhood and wanted the U.S. to help keep Egyptian President Mubarak in power.

Note – these videos are more than two years old.  Will Americans awaken from their stupor in time?  Too many of us are dumbed down; they don’t understand squat about the Bill of Rights,  especially the first, second, fourth, and tenth amendments.  NDAA abrogated the fourth amendment, making the U.S. a de-facto police state.  We are no longer a free country.  The political Left wants to criminalize freedom of speech against anyone opposed to their pro-Marxist, pro-abortion, pro-gay rights, pro-Islam agenda.  Now, we have Islamic infiltration within our government, military, schools, and, as the speaker points out, other countries  cultures are being replaced by an Islamic majority via their birthrate.  WAKE the ! UP!

(TAMPA, FL, 6/17/13) – The Florida chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-FL), along with other community organizations, announced today that it has called on the University of Central Florida (UCF) to review the accuracy and objectivity of information offered to students in courses taught by Dr. Jonathan Matusitz.

Fla. Prof Says Muslims ‘Procreate Like Mushrooms After the Rain,’ ‘The Problem is Islam’

RELATED:

Frank Gaffney, Pamela Geller, Prof. Matusitz, Bill Murray-

ISLAMIC DOCTRINE V. U.S. NAT’L SECURITY

Extremism — reblogged

My thanks to Citizen Tom for this post.

Citizen Tom

Charles de Steuben's Bataille de Poitiers en octobre 732 depicts a triumphant Charles Martel (mounted) facing 'Abdul Rahman Al Ghafiqi (right) at the Battle of Tours.Charles de Steuben‘s Bataille de Poitiers en octobre 732 depicts a triumphant Charles Martel (mounted) facing ‘Abdul Rahman Al Ghafiqi (right) at the Battle of Tours.

Here the object is to tag a fairly simple thought onto a more complex post, Extremism byKeith DeHavelle. Extremism considers the possibility of reforming Islam.

The Middle East is starting to look more sensible about Islamic extremism than is the Obama administration. Isn’t that a sad thing to say?

Here is a Saudi Arabian author being interviewed on television, and he describes the problem. He notes, correctly, that there is little difference between the “moderate” Muslim clerics and the most radical Muslim Brotherhood jihadist supporters: Both groups preach the same concepts from the same revered sources. He suggests that Islam needs a Reformation like Christianity had, and not just a Luther but a Calvin as well:

Turki Al-Hamad:…

View original post 343 more words

         11da698d25a8f9e129aed86392b761b4   Please visit swissdefenceleague’s site to view the entire post.

The Worst Cancer – Government Islamics

The many threats we’re faced with all demand action. Conservatives are split on which needs to be addressed first. My personal observations on this subject may not be shared by many; however, the single most immediate threat to us as a nation, and a people is Islam.

The world changed forever on Sept 11th 2001.  There are still too many of us who are in denial that our own government was involved, and hate me for even giving voice to that thought. The evidence is there, but the willfully deluded will never face up to the truth, preferring to accept the MSM version of that fateful day.

Subsequently, Congress allowed the Executive branch sweeping powers that circumvented the Constitution, powers that should NEVER have been granted in the name of “safety and security”.  I suppose they forgot the warnings made by founding fathers so very long ago:

“Any people that would give up liberty for a little temporary safety deserves neither liberty nor safety.” Benjamin Franklin
“Government is not reason; it is not eloquence. It is force. And force, like fire, is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.”   George Washington

Even if (and I don’t share this view) George Bush was to be trusted with powers that voided the 4th amendment, this did not mean future administrations would not abuse those powers.  Obama, with his NDAA, greatly magnified the already obscene “Patriot Act” which I refer to as the UN-Patriot Act .

Islam’s aim is the destruction of Israel, and the establishment of an Islamic dominated world. Sound familiar?

Congress, bunch of steers that they were, sat back and permitted the fraud at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, to permeate the government with Islamists, many with ties to Islamic terrorist groups.  Using Startpage.com, simply entering “Obamas Muslim appointees” resulted in a long list of web addresses – below, a few excerpts from these results:

First this from from “Now The End Begins:”  “The White House Welcomes the Muslim Brotherhood”

“… Has the Muslim Brotherhood truly infiltrated the Obama White House? Fatah certainly seems to think so. His accusations, particularly those that focus on U.S. government infiltration, are worth exploring further … After all, how better to take down an opponent than to infiltrate U.S. leadership ranks? That, in fact, has been one of the Brotherhood’s plans for years. Cal Thomas writes … In 1991, a memo written by Mohamed Akram for the Shura Council of the Muslim Brotherhood spelled out the objective of the organization. Akram said the Muslim Brotherhood “must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions …”  (from Now The End Begins: “The White House Welcomes the Muslim Brotherhood)

Andrea Elliot, writing for the New York Times reports in April of 2010:

“…Muslim and Arab-American advocates have participated in policy discussions and received briefings from top White House aides and other officials on health care legislation, foreign policy, the economy, immigration and national security. They have met privately with a senior White House adviser, Valerie Jarrett, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. to discuss civil liberties concerns and counterterrorism strategy … Also this month, Tariq Ramadan, a prominent Muslim academic, visited the United States for the first time in six years after Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton reversed a decision by the Bush administration, which had barred Mr. Ramadan from entering the country, initially citing the U.S.A. Patriot Act. Mrs. Clinton also cleared the way for another well-known Muslim professor, Adam Habib, who had been denied entry under similar circumstances…”

In an article titled “Obama Advisor Defends Sharia And The Overthrow Of The U.S. Constitution,” “The Obama File” provides the following:

“…Vijay Kumar, candidate for Congress, says that according to an article in the United Kingdom’s Telegraph, in October of 2009, Barack Obama’s adivsor on Muslim affairs, Dalia Mogahed, went on Islamic television with members of the radical Islamic group Hizb ut Tahrir and defended their blatant call for the overthrow of all ‘man-made law’ — which includes the United States Constitution — and the adoption of Islamic Sharia law as ‘the source of legislation’: … Miss Mogahed, appointed to the President’s Council on Faith-Based and Neighbourhood Partnerships, said the Western view of Sharia was ‘oversimplified’ and the majority of women around the world associate it with ‘gender justice.’ … The White House adviser made the remarks on a London-based TV discussion programme hosted by Ibtihal Bsis, a member of the extremist Hizb ut Tahrir party … The group believes in the non-violent destruction of Western democracy and the creation of an Islamic state under Sharia Law across the world … Miss Mogahed appeared alongside Hizb ut Tahrir’s national women’s officer, Nazreen Nawaz … During the 45-minute discussion, on the Islam Channel programme Muslimah Dilemma earlier this week, the two members of the group made repeated attacks on secular ‘man-made law,’ and the West’s ‘lethal cocktail of liberty and capitalism.’ … They called for Sharia Law to be ‘the source of legislation’ and said that women should not be ‘permitted to hold a position of leadership in government.’ … Miss Mogahed made no challenge to these demands and said that ‘promiscuity’ and the ‘breakdown of traditional values’ were what Muslims admired least about the West … Miss Mogahed admitted that even many Muslims associated Sharia with ‘maximum criminal punishments’ and ‘laws that… to many people seem unequal to women,’  but added: ‘Part of the reason that there is this perception of Sharia is because Sharia is not well understood and Islam as a faith is not well understood.’ …”

ISLAM AS A FAITH IS ALL TOO WELL UNDERSTOOD.  Their Koran -among many other things- permits them to lie to all non-Muslims, in order to obtain their goals; they are loyal only to Islam, not the country they inhabit, and use the freedoms they enjoy by being here to assist in our own destruction.

The feds refusal to enforce their own laws regarding border security exacerbates this situation. (Ms. Dawald, founder of One Nation Rising, certainly knows how that refusal makes the Muslim infiltration that much more deadly)

Include the degraded situation in the Middle East, the effects of Muslim immigrants throughout Europe, and Muslim terrorist activities in other parts of the world, and we have a cancer that must be dealt with swiftly, before it metastasizes.

X

THE RIPENING WANDERER

https://theripeningwanderer.com/

The Clockwork Conservative

All wound up about politics, history, culture... lots of stuff.

blogsense-by-barb

at the Re-Birth of America!

ON MY WATCH - the writings of SamHenry

A Writer's Take on Global and National Issues with Background Information and Humor As Needed

Once Written

A Political Blog

Welcome to the Right Central

Warning: Not your average conservative newsletter. Viewer discretion advised.

markokloos.com

purveyor of space kablooie stories.

Truth in Palmyra

By Wally Fry

Truth and Shadows

Following the white rabbit

Pacific Paratrooper

This WordPress.com site is Pacific War era information

IHRA

The best in WWII aviation history

BUNKERVILLE | God, Guns and Guts Comrades!

God, Guns and Guts Comrades!

Aces Flying High

An Aussie's travels to air shows, aviation museums and related events around the world, with a bit of aerospace history along the way!

Eyes on Europe & Middle East

Des regards croisés sur l'Europe et le Moyen Orient

Doc Baize

Give me liberty or give me death!

partneringwitheagles

WHENEVER ANY FORM OF GOVERNMENT BECOMES DESTRUCTIVE OF THESE ENDS (LIFE,LIBERTY,AND THE PERSUIT OF HAPPINESS) IT IS THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO ALTER OR ABOLISH IT, AND TO INSTITUTE A NEW GOVERNMENT...

Chastisement 2014

He is ready to separate the chaff from the wheat with his winnowing fork

Decoded-Information

The Take Down Of America

The Dangers of Allah

Confused about Islam, Muslims, Taqiyya, Kitman, The Islamic State, and Sharia? I've spent 14 years studying these confused beings.  They are not at all what they want us to believe, especially those who are ruled by al Qaeda , ISIS and the Muslim Brotherhood as well as those who commit overt and covert Jihad while practicing Sharia tortures upon women

Treason Among Us

A blog by Guido Volante Author of "Treason Among Us; Secrets of the S.E.C."

The Counter Jihad Report

News ~ Resources ~ Activism

creepingsharia.wordpress.com/

Documenting the Islamization of America

Digestible Politics

Politics Made Easy!

A Conservative Christian Man

Stand for Your Belief or it is Not a Belief but an Excuse

sharia unveiled

illuminating minds

We Moved > Go To:

WWW.THEMADJEWESS.NET

%d bloggers like this: