Archive for January, 2015

2nd A Criminals

Today, I’m in the proper mood (angry) to take on these imbeciles – Liberals don’t understand, or give a (omitted) for the term personal responsibility.

My father, born in 1918, grew up on a farm, and knew about gun safety; regularly employed the use of a bolt action .22 rifle in controlling vermin and even coyotes, at the age of seven.  This being passed down by his father.  “Society”, with their misguided sense of propriety, fails miserably to realize that we are still free from being spirited away or otherwise harmed by malcontents, because of our right to bear arms.  This in spite of “O” and his damned NDAA.

They are in the same class as those bleeding hearts who fail to realize there are biblical edicts for swift use of capital punishment.   Sometimes there are no “shades of grey”; only black and white. Period.

If the actions of Pol Pot, Mao Tse Tung, (F that “Zedung” stuff) Stalin, and other despots aren’t enough to make them see the dangers of Rogue Government, NOTHING will, until they become their willing victims.  Of course, then it will just be too late for them.  A summary of Pol Pot from

Pol Pot (1925-1998) and his communist Khmer Rouge movement led Cambodia from 1975 to 1979. During that time, about 1.5 million Cambodians out of a total population of 7 to 8 million died of starvation, execution, disease or overwork. Some estimates place the death toll even higher. One detention center, S-21, was so notorious that only seven of the roughly 20,000 people imprisoned there are known to have survived. The Khmer Rouge, in their attempt to socially engineer a classless peasant society, took particular aim at intellectuals, city residents, ethnic Vietnamese, civil servants and religious leaders.


Posted on January 30, 2015

Imposing more and more control.

By Chris Eger,

A New York lawmaker wants to prohibit minors under age 12 from being able to visit a gun show anywhere in the state in an effort to reduce gun violence.

The bill, introduced by state Assemblywoman Linda B. Rosenthal, a Democrat who represents the Hell’s Kitchen area of Manhattan, would bar entry to pre-teen youth to these shows with no provision allowed for those with a supervising adult.

“As the gun industry prepares a public campaign to broaden the appeal of guns, it is important that we establish reasonable age limits for admission to gun shows by children,” reads a memo Rosenthal wrote for her legislation.

“Within New York State and other areas of jurisdiction, we have myriad regulations that seek to protect minors from exposure to certain potentially dangerous situations and influences,” the memo continued. “For example, a minor is restricted from watching films or playing certain video games that portray deadly weaponry and gunplay. Currently, however, minors of any age may gain unfettered access to a gun show.”

Read more: Guns

NOT amused…

After rechecking the source of a post I just trashed, I cannot in good faith (no pun intended) vouch for their authenticity. Other items at the site would indicate that they’re a (in very poor taste) satirical “news” source.

I left this appropriate comment at their “Pope” article, with other commenters, who apparently, were also duped:

Is this site for real, or MAD magazine on steroids? I saw this on their politics pg; Do you think this title is real?:

In Gesture of Goodwill to Saudi Arabia, Obama to Announce Executive Pardon of All Saudi 911 Hijackers

*                         *                        *                        *                         *                    *

I apologize for not being more alert before making a posting. My only “consolation” is that other legitimate sources such as Fox News have  been their victims as well.  “X”


In previous posts I have made mention the importance of having a proper command of English.

I can find no more critical reason for this than our Constitution’s insistence that a candidate intending to become President be a natural born citizen. Democrats,  Congress, and even some so-called Republicans have seen fit to twist or otherwise pervert the Constitutional intent of the term natural born citizen. I am most grateful to both Freedom Outpost, and Publius-Huldah’s Blog  a source they referenced in regard to this subject.

This is proof of the need for a Presidential candidate to have a Father who is a U.S. citizen at the time of his birth – PERIOD-  First, an excerpt from Publius-Huldah’s Blog which contains the reasons for keeping the original intent of the language intact:

Word Definitions:

Like clouds, word meanings change throughout time.  “Awful” once meant “full of wonder and reverence”; “cute” meant “bowlegged”; “gay” meant “jovial”; and “nice” meant “precise”.

Accordingly, if someone from an earlier time wrote of a “cute gay man”, he was not referring to an adorable homosexual, but to a cheerful bowlegged man.

So!  In order to understand the genuine meaning of a text, we must use the definitions the authors used when they wrote it.  Otherwise, written texts become as shifting and impermanent as the clouds – blown hither and yon throughout the years by those who unthinkingly read in their own uninformed understandings, or deliberately pervert the text to further their own agenda.

So!  Is Our Constitution built on the Rock of Fixed Definitions – those our Framers used?  Or are its Words mere clouds to be blown about by Acts of Congress, whims of federal judges, and the idiotic notions of every ignoramus who writes about it?

What Did Our Framers mean by “natural born Citizen”?

Article II, §1, cl. 5, U.S. Constitution, requires the President to be a “natural born Citizen”.

The meaning of this term is not set forth in The Constitution or in The Federalist Papers; and I found no discussion of the meaning in Madison’s Journal of the Federal Convention or in Alexander Hamilton’s notes of the same.

What does this tell us? That they all knew what it meant. We don’t go around defining “pizza”, because every American over the age of four knows what a pizza is.

Our Framers had no need to define “natural born Citizen” in the Constitution, because by the time of the Federal Convention of 1787, a formal definition of the term consistent with the new republican principles1 already existed in Emer Vattel’s classic, Law of Nations.

And we know that our Framers carefully studied and relied upon Vattel’s work.  I’ll prove it.

How Vattel’s Law of Nations got to the Colonies, and its Influence Here:

During 1775, Charles Dumas, an ardent republican [as opposed to a monarchist] living in Europe sent three copies of Vattel’s Law of Nations to Benjamin Franklin. Here is a portion of Franklin’s letter of Dec. 9, 1775 thanking Dumas for the books:

“… I am much obliged by the kind present you have made us of your edition of Vattel. It came to us in good season, when the circumstances of a rising state make it necessary frequently to consult the law of nations. Accordingly that copy, which I kept, (after depositing one in our own public library here, and sending the other to the College of Massachusetts Bay, as you directed,) has been continually in the hands of the members of our Congress, now sitting, who are much pleased with your notes and preface, and have entertained a high and just esteem for their author…” (2nd para) [boldface added]

Vattel’s Law of Nations was thereafter “pounced upon by studious members of Congress, groping their way without the light of precedents.”

Her post goes on to explain Vattel’s rules. 

The Founders applied these rules to the Constitution:

 Vattel on “natural born citizens”, “inhabitants”, and “naturalized citizens”:

From our beginning, we were subjects of the British Crown. With the War for Independence, we became citizens.1 [READ this footnote!] We needed new concepts to fit our new status as citizens.  Vattel provided these new republican concepts of “citizenship”. The gist of what Vattel says in Law of Nations, Book I, Ch. XIX, at §§ 212-217, is this:

§ 212: Natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens – it is necessary that they be born of a father who is a citizen. If a person is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

§ 213:  Inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are foreigners who are permitted to stay in the country. They are subject to the laws of the country while they reside in it. But they do not participate in all the rights of citizens – they enjoy only the advantages which the law or custom gives them. Their children follow the condition of their fathers – they too are inhabitants.

§ 214: A country may grant to a foreigner the quality of citizen – this is naturalization.  In some countries, the sovereign cannot grant to a foreigner all the rights of citizens, such as that of holding public office – this is a regulation of the fundamental law.  And in England, merely being born in the country naturalizes the children of a foreigner.

§§ 215, 216 & 217: Children born of citizens in a foreign country, at sea, or while overseas in the service of their country, are “citizens”. By the law of nature alone, children follow the condition of their fathers; the place of birth produces no change in this particular.

Do you see?  The republican concept of “natural born citizenship” is radically different from the feudal notion of “natural born subjectship.” Under feudalism, merely being born in the domains of the King made one – by birth – a “natural born subject”.  But in Vattel’s Model and Our Constitutional Republic, Citizens are “natural born” only if they are born of Citizens.



Shouldn’t We Hold Senator Ted Cruz to the Same Standard as Barack Obama?

And, the potential Republican presidential candidates are off and running at the Iowa Freedom Summit. The Blaze reported that Gov. Scott Walker (R-WI) wowed the crowd with his “go big and go bold” attitude. But, this isn’t about Gov. Walker. His message sounds good and what he has accomplished in Wisconsin has been bold – actions Republicans in Congress should notice and heed.

No, this is about part of the message Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) sent the attendees at the summit in Iowa. Cruz repeatedly called for “reigniting the miracle of America.” That is a great message. The miracle of America needs to be reignited if we are to continue our nation as the constitutional republic the founding fathers created.

Cruz indicated that he and his wife, Heidi, were there for the same reasons as everyone else – “we fear for our children. We fear for our grandchildren.”

It is exactly why many of us do what we do. We fear for our children and our grandchildren; we fear they will not grow up in a nation where individual God -given rights, freedom and liberty are protected but instead reviled and stripped away leaving misery in its place. We fear our children and grandchildren will suffer immensely at the hands of those indoctrinated by the government. And, we fear that some of our posterity will succumb and abandon the values we hold dear.

Sen. Cruz stated that voters should “support people who not only say the right things, but have a history of fighting for those issues.”

This is something that all Americans can agree. It’s not only important for candidates to “say the right thing”; it’s important for those candidates to back up those words with actions complimentary to their words. In other words, candidates need to back up their talk by “walking the walk.” Most Americans would agree this is something that has been lacking in Washington for quite some time.

Cruz went on to say:

“Iowa plays a unique and special role in the political process. The men and women gathered here today and across the state, you have a responsibility that you take very seriously to scrutinize any candidate for national office. To look them in the eyes and to hold them to account.”

So, Sen. Cruz is advocating for the American voters in Iowa to hold candidates accountable. If there is any doubt about what Cruz meant, he goes on to explain.

“Well you know what? Talk is cheap… And one of the most important roles of the men and women in this room, the men and women in Iowa will play, is to look each candidate in the eye and say, ‘Don’t talk. Show me.'”

“If you say you support liberty, show me where you stood up for it. If you say you support religious liberties, show me where you stood and fought for them. If you say you oppose Obamacare, show me where you stood and fought against it.”

So, Sen. Cruz is advocating for Americans to hold their candidates accountable. By Sen. Cruz’s own rules, “if you say you support the Constitution, show me where you stood and fought for it.”

A few commenters have indicated that questioning the eligibility of a candidate, such as Sen. Ted Cruz, to hold the office of President based on the “natural born citizen” requirement in a previous article is basically a “hit piece” against Sen. Ted. Cruz. Since when is standing on the Constitutional principles and asking potential candidates to be accountable dubbed “hitting” against a candidate? Is this not exactly what Sen. Cruz himself is stating for Americans to do – look them in the eye and hold them accountable?

No branch of government, legislative, executive or judicial, is supreme over the other. Each has their roles and are to participate in the “checks and balances” process in order that one branch does not gain more power and control over the other, nor does either branch usurp the law of the land, the Constitution of the United States of America. As we have seen, the Supreme Court has usurped its authority to hear cases or make “rulings” in order to implant “their” personal beliefs and opinions upon the people of this nation. And, the central government has usurped power from the states.

While many cite Supreme Court rulings “declaring” the definition of a natural born citizen, they have forgotten that the First Congress passed the Naturalization Act of 1790 that clearly indicates the definition of “natural born citizen.” Since Ms. Publius Huldah has already researched and addressed how the First Congress of this nation viewed “natural born citizens,” it is imperative that all Americans learn it and understand how our government, all branches, have subverted the framers intent to serve the government’s and political party’s purpose, which is not necessarily in the best interest of our nation, and not just with the natural born citizen requirement for president.

So, the same requirement of natural born citizen has to be applied to Jindal, Rubio, and any candidate vying for the office of President. The reason Sen. Ted Cruz received so much attention regarding his potential candidacy for president was because of his and his father’s dedication to the original intent of the Constitution of the united States of America and their willingness to proclaim it loudly and publicly. And, the questions were asked of Americans, who claim to support the Constitution, if they are willing to forego their own principles to support a candidate because “they like the message,” “the Democrats did it,” “Obama is not eligible,” or any other host of qualifiers in order to play “tit for tat.” It seems that a few were and are.

Jindal and Rubio have demonstrated their willingness to “waffle” with the pervading breeze. Who could forget the “Gang of Eight” immigration “reform“? However, these two should be held accountable, as well, to the natural born citizen requirement and their willingness to forego it for their own personal gain despite their talk of constitutionality.

To be clear, the message sent by Sen. Ted Cruz, standing on our supreme law of the land, is a message that every American should embrace. And, everyone embracing that message and stating that message should let their actions reflect their words. It is not about “liking” or “disliking” anyone. It’s about upholding and supporting the Constitution, the principles of the founding of this nation, the laws of God and nature and refusing to participate in the act of hypocrisy. It’s about preserving our Constitution and not bending requirements to suit a purpose, no matter how good the message or how well someone is liked.

Remember, as Constitution-supporting a president is or may be, Congress is the legislative branch of government. As such, Congress can be complicit in lawlessness, as we have seen with Obama and past presidencies, or they can function constitutionally, which they have failed to do time and again going back over a hundred years. The same with the Supreme Court.

Would Sen. Ted Cruz be a good president of this nation? To be honest, he would. Sen. Cruz would certainly be better than what has been in the White House for decades. However, it does not change the requirement that a president be a natural born citizen. If some, who say they support the Constitution, are so willing to overlook it because of their infatuation with a candidate, what does that actually say? You can decide that on your own as we all have a different answer.

In the meantime, we should all take Sen. Cruz’s advice – look candidates in the eye and hold them to account.


Sen.Ted Cruz’s father, was born in 1939 in Matanzas, Cuba.  END OF STORY. “X”

This just made my day!

I’m proud to be a member of Gun Nut Nation; where ninety of every one hundred owns a gun. “X”


The USA has, by far, the highest per capita gun ownership in the world. Progressives will tell you that this is what makes America the Murder Capitol of Planet Earth. But we’re not, and in this devastatingly effective Firewall, Bill Whittle shows why the center of Gun Nut Nation is in fact one of the safest places in the world.

Posted on January 24, 2015 by cptnemo2013



“Muslims are masters of deception and manipulation, They use your taboos to intimidate you and silence you. They know the greatest taboo in the west is “Racism” so they don’t hesitate to label you a “racist” to intimidate you despite Islam is not a race but a belief system. As I mentioned before, don’t show them any sign of weakness and allow them to push their own values on upon you. They understand ONLY the language of POWER. Just say NO to their unreasonable non-stop demands.”


A Warning To The West: A Voice From The Heart Of The Islamic World

Warning: please read carefully.

The following article is not written with “hatred” or “Islamophobia” or “ignorance”. Muslims usually accuse falsely those who dare to criticize Islam or those who make them listen to what they don’t want to hear about their religion. These empty accusations don’t intimidate me now or drive me to a state of silence as their wish. What I am about to share is the ultimate truth that has been lived, experienced and suffered by me for more than 30 years. This experience was gained by living in my home country of Egypt which is now a pure Muslim society. Like so many others I have been burned by this transformation. This transformation has seen me witness and experience Islam turn my home country to ruins and its followers are now threatening to bring the same fate to your own country.

Niqabis-of-UK.0Islam is not like any other religion. Islam is a supremacist racist political and social ideology wrapped in a thin peel of religious rituals. It seeks domination and supremacy over all other systems. From my personal experience I feel that without doubt Islam is worse than Nazism and fascism systems combined.

Followers of Islam believe they are the only righteous people on earth and the only nation who hold the truth. Muslims believe Islam  is the only true religion.

Due to this Muslims believe everyone else who has a different religion, or has no faith and does not follow Islam are“Kaffirs” (a derogatory term means unbelievers). Muslims are influenced by many frivolous koranic verses and hadiths (words and deeds of their prophet) teaching them they are the best nation that has ever emerged on earth. For example, according to surat (verse) 3:110 from the Quran, Allah said to Muslims: “Thus We have made you the best nation, that you be witnesses over mankind and the Messenger (Muhammad) be a witness over you”.

10441003_10202541408276486_6373692814228356281_nMuslims are in your country, but they live not to integrate or to be part of your society or at least to be equal with others, but to dominate and to be the only privileged group. Muslims achieve this  by turning you into a second class citizen in your own country.

They immigrate to your countries holding the same belief system that turned their lives into hell on earth. This same belief, same religion made their lives unsupportable in their original societies. It is the same religion that transformed their countries into war zones of endless conflicts. Muslims now homeless want to apply this system and live and apply the same destruction in your own country.

Muslims are not in your country to help build it or to make it prosper.  Many believe this, including politicians. Muslims are in your country to drain its resources and to suck the blood out of society. For example Muslims represent the majority of all your country’s welfare recipients.


Photo on the left: Muslim women waiting in Marseille, France outside a social aid organization. (2014)

A real Muslim’s loyalty is not and will never be to your countries but to the global Islamic “Umma” (nation) only.

At this point please don’t get me wrong. I am not saying that ALL Muslims are bad; But we have no choice but to take care of them all because they ALL believe totally in this evil ideology,  but they do ALL believe in an evil man, a warlord, The Prophet of Islam.

In the world of snakes and vipers, the average person can’t distinguish between the poisonous snake and the non-poisonous snake; the average person has no choice but to avoid all kind of snakes.. Since the world did not invent a tool able to detect who is the “devout” Muslim and who is the “nominal” Muslim or a device to detect who is telling the truth and who practising “taqqiyah تقية” (telling lies to the unbelievers in order to advance the cause of Islam), so it is wise to take your precautions against ALL Muslims and not accept them as immigrants or asylum seekers, they left us no choice but to avoid them all.

It’s no ones fault that Muslims put themselves in this situation, since not one single Muslim has the will, the courage or indeed the ability to stop his fellow believers from harming others in the name of his religion. Not one single Muslim group has the guts or the will to organize manifestations to condemn Islamic terrorism, like those organized to condemn cartoons and youtube videos criticizing their “Prophet”, not one single mosque or Imam or Islamic organisation can teach against those violent texts in the Quran and the Hadith (words, deeds and biography of the prophet of Islam) which incite thousands of Muslims to commit acts of terrorism, because they can’t go against their own islamic books ….

Until Muslims can accept responsibility and act to change, then they have no right to demand respect. Until then they have no right to endlessly act like robots and repeat that Islam is a “religion of peace”. This claim has absolutely no value or credibility now. Muslims can’t ask the rest of the world to respect them as they don’t respect others and continue to impose their laws and way of life on others.

Golden Rule’s don’t exist in Islam. With Muslims their thoughts are based as if they are travelling long a one way road. One direction ONLY, one direction. This has been the same since the time of their prophet in the 7th century and continues to this day… Muslims demand tolerance, but they don’t have to tolerate anybody else in other societies or faiths…They demand accommodation, but they don’t have to accommodate anybody else…They demand respect but they don’t have to respect anybody else….Remember, they immigrate to your western countries and think that’s your duty to integrate to them, not the reverse.

Muslims don’t understand that respect is earned not given.

Screen-Shot-2014-06-13-at-5.21.55-PMIslam turned their lives and the lives of others around them into a living hell. Now Muslims are immigrating in huge numbers from their desolated countries and invading yours. They do whatever they can to immigrate to Europe, America, Australia, even if the price is risking their own lives and traveling in sinking disused ships in the middle of the sea. Thousands upon thousands of Muslims everyday stand in front of western consulates in their countries hoping to get a visa to leave their ruined, corrupted, violent and failed societies. All as a result of Islam.

They wish to see your country as another copy of the one they and their belief ruined and then escaped from. Today, especially the second and third generation of this Islamic immigration have become even more fanatic and violent within the counties that their families sought refuge in. The latter generations are also realizing the success that Islam has had on changing the country’s demographic profile and laws that give extra privileges to them.

Muslims have a very high birthrate comparing to yours and they will strive to be the dominant or at least the majority group in the future . This will cause a lot of changes and modification in you freedom, laws, quality and way of life and catastrophic consequences, for example; civil war.

Not every individual who identifies himself as a Muslim means automatically he is an expert in Islam or have read or even know all his religious texts from A to Z.  Not every Muslim means that they must be a scholar of Islam. Many Islam for them is just some rituals no more no less.

You may see many of them and think that their religion is all about love and peace. Many Muslims are so superficially knowledgeable about their own religion. For them Islam is only some rituals like praying, fasting Ramadan, doing the Hajj (pilgrimage to Mecca) etc.. But pay attention, they could be either VERY IGNORANT about their religion, or VERY MANIPULATIVE.

The vast majority of Muslims are programmed to recite not to understand holy texts, to glorify not to analyze, to praise not to criticize. That’s why you can meet some Muslims telling you some utopian whitewashed issues about their religion.

A Muslim is ordered to not ask questions about their religion. This is mentioned in the Quran “verse 5:101: “O you who have believed (Muslims), do not ask about things which, if they are shown to you, will distress you.” If they question they could be considered an apostate, and could be killed by their fellows. If claims about the “peacefulness” of Islam are true, Muslims could have taught it to their fellows who commit all kind of atrocities proudly in the name of Islam. This would have stopped them from committing evil in the name of their religion. But since these ignorant Muslims know well there is no Islamic textual basis or religious jurisprudence sustaining their claims, they prefer to tell you these untruths about Islam.

They understand the western mentality is open and receptive and can accept claims without suspicion or doubt. Unfortunately since many of the western people have lost their faiths, values and principles, they have become empty inside and easily influenced, and easily fooled.

Muslims depend on your ignorance to feed you the poison like a piece of chocolate. Muslims need and must tell you these utopian imaginary sweet sounding things about Islam either to stop you from resisting their plans or to convert you to Islam, or both.

Never forget the following fact: The more a Muslim is devout and religious, the more they become dangerous, full of hatred and has tendency to violence

Thousands of times I heard Muslims living in the west, their non-Muslim apologists, western politicians and the western mainstream media repeat the following statement : The vast majority of Muslims are moderate peace loving people and only a tiny minority are “extremists”:

article-0-0989D918000005DC-427_468x378On the terrorist attack of September 11th 2001 I was still living  in Egypt (80 million people in this time). 19 Muslim hijackers killed 3000 innocent Americans by their own hands. Almost 80 million Muslim Egyptians following the attacks were celebrating the death of those American victims: All public transport was free this day and for the next three days all the restaurants offered free meals and sweets. All the cinemas and gardens offered free entry, the radio stations didn’t stop playing happy victory songs….Does this mean that only 19 hijackers were “extremists” while the 80 million Muslim Egyptians were “moderate peace loving” people? Does that mean that 80 million are “peace loving” only because they did not kill by their own hands?

You are not required to kill to be called violent or “extremist”or “radical”or “terrorist”. You can be violent, extremist, radical or terrorist even if you don’t kill with your own hands.  That’s what the West is unable to understand…In Islam, there is many forms of “Jihad” other than killing in the battlefield…The vast majority of Muslims are sympathizers with terrorists. They believe in the same ideology and share their goals even if they do not hold arms themselves. That’s why this vast majority is silent and don’t show any opposition to their fellows who kill in the name of their religion.

A Muslim generally, as holy texts command, can never befriend a kaffir (non-Muslim). TO them, you are a “kaffir”, and the “Kaffir” in the Quran is UNCLEAN… They believe hell fire is your final destiny, the only reason why they may smile to you is to proselytize you “Dawah or Daawa دعوة” . This is a religious duty to all Muslims; to try to convert non-Muslims to Islam or at least to try to stop you from defending yourself and to let them achieve their goal quietly and to neutralize you . As it is mentioned in verse 3:28from the Quran: “Let not the believers take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah: except by way of precaution, that ye may Guard yourselves from them…”.

This hypocrisy is widely used and encouraged in Islam when dealing with kaffirs. it’s called “Taqqiyah“ and it is widely used by muslims in non-Islamic countries.

Muslims are killing each other using the most barbaric ways in Islamic countries. Muslim fathers or mothers can kill their daughters for not wearing the islamic veil or for being too westernize…If they are such unmerciful between each other, how do you except them to be nice to you or befriend you, the “Kaffirs”?…Before you say not All Muslims do that, please admit that this happens, and it happens everyday and happens ONLY in Islamic societies.

Proud-Muslim-WomenAfter almost every terrorist attack Muslims in the West pretend to condemn the  killing of “Innocent” people or say Islam condemns the killing of such “innocents”…The notion of “innocent” in Islam can never be applied on Non-Muslims, because according to the islamic Jurisprudence, they (the non-Muslims) rejected the message of Allah and Mohammed (they are not Muslims), so they are considered automatically non innocents…But when the Muslims say it in the western media addressing this statement to a non-Muslim audience , they are considered to not be lying because  they mean”Islam condemns the killing of Muslims”. They are the only people considered Innocents in the Islamic jurisprudence…

Muslims can never say Islam condemns the killing of Non-Muslims openly and directly, but says “Innocents” instead…This widely used tactic is called  ”Tawriya” or  ”Ketman” (تورية و كتمان ). This is an integral part of the Islamic teachings on dealing with non-Muslims. It means a Muslim say something but in his heart he means another thing completely the opposite for example. So that is NOT considered lying in Islam.

The same thing is applied to the word “terrorism” or “terrorist”…Muslims consider what they do is not terrorism; In their mentality they believe it’s a “resistance” or they are “defending Islam” , “fighting oppression” or “Jihad in the way of Allah”. Therefore Muslims can easily say “Islam condemns terrorism” or “Muslims are not Terrorists” because in their hearts they believe what they do is not terrorism and as mentioned before they are not lying.

9981_361268900716718_4164549304590573068_nThe ultimate goal of Islam is the total domination of your country and eventually the whole world.

Remember the words of the Muslim terrorist “Mohammed Atta”  addressing his passengers victims of flight 11 of American Airways before he hit the First World Trade Centre in 9/11 and kill them all with others inside the tower. He announced to them in the flight intercom: “We have some planes. Just stay quiet and you’ll be O.K. We are returning to the airport. Nobody move. Everything will be okay. If you try to make any moves, you’ll endanger yourself and the airplane. Just stay quiet.”… and he repeated again “Nobody move, please. We are going back to the airport. Don’t try to make any stupid moves.” The poor victims believed him and stayed quiet and they didn’t know they were going to their death.

This is what Muslims want you to do. To stay quiet, ignorant and don’t resist them. Only at the end  will they reveal their evil ideology and conquer you in your own country. By then you will be digging your own grave with your own hands.

If there is one message I can pass on to you, let it be this: Please be proud of who you are. Be proud of your country, values, civilization, heritage, culture and religion…This is the secret of your strength, the sign of your power, you have absolutely nothing to be ashamed of.

Don’t forget the fact that you inherited the best civilization the humanity ever knew. This is the civilization that brought enlightenment to the world. This is why people from around the world, including Muslims want and try to live in your countries. Even if Muslims play on your sense of guilt to make you feel ashamed of something, don’t be driven by their dirty tactics. Stay strong and proud…They have millions of reasons to be ashamed of themselves and ashamed of their religion; They are part of the most decadent culture in history and their countries are the most backwards on earth. But they continue to convince themselves that they are perfect and proud and they play the role of the proud people. This is how they succeed to take over you, your culture and more.

Show them any lack of pride or any sign of weakness, self-loathing and they will use it against you and make you their prey.

Never forget that nobody can ride  on your back if you stand straight.

news_img_467499_1Muslims use your own democratic laws and values against you and they do it successfully while you keep sleeping as if as in a deep coma. This is why the leftists are the people who are worthy of  the title “useful idiots”. They are in a perpetual state of shame and self-loathing and will be the first victims of Islam once it takes over…

Muslims use them as a stick to beat you with, but even they will never ever be accepted as friends to the Muslims after, and they will definitely be their first victims. Leftists, Liberals, progressives, Antifa, Code Pink etc. are all appeasers of Islam. Appeasing evil is cowardice. They are fooled people who feed crocodiles hoping they will eat them last. They are the enemy within your countries.

Your country is like your house; you expect visitors who come to your house to respect you and respect your rules, not the opposite. Visitors must appreciate your kindness and your generosity for receiving them into your home and not imposing their own rules on you. This is your house, you own it, so you have the obligation to protect it and defend it.

If the visitor doesn’t like your rules, all he has to do is to leave. Nobody told them to visit you, and nobody will prevent him from leaving. As they came to your house by their own choice, they can leave your house freely or by force..

For more than 1400 years Islam has been protected from criticism.  Nobody has dared to question this belief system lest to be condemned to death. Islam is surrounded by very high walls, and Muslims are not allowed to see beyond that wall. The idea of questioning Islam is unthinkable to Muslims, so they are unable to accept the fact there is some people start to break this wall and allow rays of lights to pass through. They are unable to bare the fact that Islam is beginning to be exposed like a nude person and people are snow seeing its true form As a reaction Muslims fight to shut  mouths and to close everyone’s eyes.

veil-1The average Muslim is unable to differentiate between criticism and insult, between analysis and attack. They interpret any criticism of Islam automatically and their own reaction is to attack or insult.

Remember the concept of “hate speech” or “insult” in the Islamic mentality is not the same as the universal concept of these words.

A “hate speech” or an “insult” in Islam is to say something Muslims don’t like to hear or to acknowledge about their religion. This can be something they don’t want you to know about their religion, even if this thing is supported by a million proof from their “sacred” Islamic texts. For example to say the prophet of Islam was a pedophile, is considered a huge insult to Mohammed or an “Islamophobia”, despite there are many authentic “hadiths” (sacred books of words and deeds of Mohammed) witness that he “married” one of his favourite wives “Aisha” when she was 6 years old and he was 54 years old.

Muslims are unable to make a difference between Islam and the tip of their own noses. Once you criticize Islam this is like a punch to their very own noses. The inability to criticize Islam must be stopped. People should be able to criticize Islam without fear of retribution. Muslims must learn that they are not above criticism or above other people or other religions. Islam like all other religions should be questioned, analyzed and criticized.

Muslims are masters of deception and manipulation, They use your taboos to intimidate you and silence you. They know the greatest taboo in the west is “Racism” so they don’t hesitate to label you a “racist” to intimidate you despite Islam is not a race but a belief system. As I mentioned before, don’t show them any sign of weakness and allow them to push their own values on upon you. They understand ONLY the language of POWER. Just say NO to their unreasonable non-stop demands.

Remember, Muslims love and NEED to portray themselves ALWAYS as “victims”. This is their greatest weapon against you in the west. Victimhood enables them to act violently and give them the pretext to attack non-muslims around the world. It fuels them more and more with hate. With this hate they generate more violence. Additionally to this Victimhood allow them to silence you and stop you from resisting their agenda. This is why the easiest thing for them is to label those who criticize Islam or reveal its reality as “racist” an “islamophobe” or “bigot”.

19veil8One final thing you must be aware of. Muslims are projectors of themselves. They accuse you of what they truly are. They accuse you of being racist, while they are themselves racist.  Islam is all about racism. They accuse you to be a hater, while they themselves hate unconditionally. Islam is full of hatred incitement and violence. They accuse you of being a bigot, while Muslims act supremacism and are bigotry themselves.

Muslims generally suffer from a collective state of paranoia and conspiracy theories. This has existed since the time of their prophet till now. They believe they are perpetually persecuted, discriminated against and oppressed by non-Muslims. They believe that Jews and Christians are plotting against them to make them convert to Christianity and Judaism.  Some Koranic verses enforce this sick sentiment in them like in Verse 2:120 “ And never will the Jews or the Christians approve of you until you follow their religion.”

Muslims residing in western countries living defensively. They interpret any disciplinary action against a Muslim or a refusal of a nonsensical religious demands as an act of anti-Muslim bias, or  direct discrimination against Muslims. Consequently Muslims cause a lot of trouble and unnecessary headaches within their host country and to the people who welcomed them in their land.

Why? The basic mistake has been countries tolerating Islamic Cultural Imperialism. This has seized upon the opportunity of the West’s open-handedness to refugees and asylum seekers. Muslims have adopted a Trojan Horse tactic to invade, over-run & take over.

By this current massive islamic immigration allowed to Western free countries (North America, Europe, and Australia), we are witnessing the beginning of the end of the west we use to know, and the beginning of the end of the western free civilization we use to cherish. 
No doubt, no doubt; The Islamic immigration is the deadliest mistake ever the west has ever made.

Nobody else in the world knows Islam and the mentality of Muslims more than those who have suffered by having Islam as a part of their life.

If you listen to the cries of the Copts of Egypt, the Christians of Syria, Iraq, Sudan, Pakistan and all the other Muslim countries you will hear the descriptions of the horrors of Islam.

See  and feel the tears of the minorities in every Islamic society. These tears will tell you the true stories of Islam. Hear the blood of the ex-Muslims pounding.  It’s their blood that is shouting out every single second asking the rest of the world to “Wake up!”

Please listen to my voice, my cry. Please see and feel my tears. Listen to my blood pounding with my message. I am a surviving victim of Islam.


The message originally written and sent in arabic by Magda Borham (not her real name) from Egypt.

Special Thanks go to Mr. John Hayward for editing the text in English.

stand your groundI will try to stay as focused as possible; the spineless, globalist mindset has been with us since our first “Police Action” (Korea, 1950) and subsequently, whenever a strong, military response has been needed, the self defeating “U.N. rules” have been followed, instead of realizing that (1) war is a last resort (2) needs to be prosecuted without restrictions, and (3) the enemy is to be utterly destroyed, so as to never pose a threat again.

The recent attacks in France can be expected anywhere, at any time, because folks refuse to see the “handwriting on the wall” and quit being politically correct where Islam is concerned. Our Muslim in the whitehouse has been their best ally; putting us at ever greater risk, while the invertebrate Congress sat back and -by inaction- became complicit in all of his crimes.

Last November,  we conservatives -supposedly- got back in the drivers seat;  what did House Speaker Boehner do? Give the Libs another 1.1 trillion instead of putting the hammer down!  At this late date, all I can say, in response to the inmates running the asylum is lock and load.  “X”



It seems like finally after nearly a weeklong nightmare in France things are starting to calm down. Everything started on Wednesday when several gunmen (who will not be named for they do not deserve the fame they sought) stormed into the office of the satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo in Paris, France, killing 12 people, including a French police officer who was unarmed and executed in the streets. Later that day, another police officer was killed in Paris by a different gunman who was associated with the other two.

The French government and law enforcement knew almost right away that the gunmen were all Islamic jihadi terrorists based on their target and what they reportedly said to survivors inside the Charlie Hebdo newsroom. The attackers reportedly mentioned that they were targeting specific people who worked for the newspaper for defying “the prophet Muhammad.” They also reportedly told people inside that they were launching the attack for AQAP, al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. Due to this, the attackers were identified quickly.

The situation finally ended Friday when the two who attacked the Charlie Hebdo newspaper were cornered north of Paris and were eventually killed by police when the attackers opened fire. The third suspect, the one who killed the policewoman in Paris, killed 4 more civilians in a Kosher grocery store in Paris before being killed by police officers. A 4th suspect is now thought to have fled to Syria to join ISIS.

The international community was quick to come out and condemn the terrorists and call them what they were, evil terrorists who attacked free expression because they disagreed with something that the newspaper had done. The French government even came out very quickly and declared the attack an act of violence by violent radical Islamic extremists. However, the United States government still has yet to declare that the attack was committed by Islamic radical extremists, as President Obama continues to avoid using the word “Islamic” although the terrorists claimed they were avenging the prophet Muhammad.

Unfortunately this is a pattern we have seen over the past few years from the Obama administration, and they have yet to change their rhetoric despite all of the evidence. Since September, there have been five attacks around the world by radical Islamic extremists, a beheading in Oklahoma, an attack on police officers in New York City, the murder of a Canadian soldier in Ottawa, the hostage situation and homicide in Sydney, and now this attack in Paris. The attack in Paris has been the most coordinated attack in the past few years.

The current resurgence in attacks on the Western World is not coincidental; it is right in line with the emergence of ISIS and al Qaeda’s attempts to stay relevant during the fight. President Obama boldly declared a few years ago that al Qaeda was on the run, but admitted there was still work to do. The international community is now seeing the consequences of not completely defeating al Qaeda and those like them. Although ISIS and al Qaeda are not the same, they appeal to the same types of people with the same type of message, a distorted and violent view of Islam that turns everyday people into violent jihadists who want to kill those who do not agree with this sort of view.

The international community, including President Obama and his administration, has spent too much time trying to be politically correct and emphasize that we must not blame the entire Muslim world for the actions of the minority. I agree, we should not blame the entire Muslim community, as many of them are moderate, and follow the true teachings of Islam, not the radical propaganda being taught to those who are being used by a few angry men. However, we also have to acknowledge the problem. The problem is that radical Islam is growing, and it is not going away. They have declared war on our way of life, and they fully intend to attack us until they defeat us. Although the President may not want to admit that, we must have the same attitude.

Our first step is to actually acknowledge the problem, acknowledge the influence that ISIS and al Qaeda are having, and then work with our allies to develop a strategy. Key to this strategy will be the influence of moderate Muslims across the world. Just a few weeks ago, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, spoke to a group of Imam’s in Egypt and declared that moderate Muslims must “revolutionize” Islam and defeat the jihadists and extremists. We must work with those like el-Sisi who also notice the problem and want to stop it. This is as much their problem as it is ours, and we need to start acting like that.

Unfortunately, it seems to have taken France’s nightmare to wake the rest of the world up to what is going on. So far the United Kingdom, Germany, Israel and Canada are among the many that have stood strong with France and have publically stated they now realize that radical Islam is a problem that must be stopped. As the leader of the free world, the United States should stand with them and do the same. The attacks in Paris should serve as a wakeup call, Islamic extremism is not going away and it must be defeated before it defeats Islam and the western way of life. We must defeat ISIS and al Qaeda specifically and show the world that freedom will always prevail in the end over evil and propaganda. I hope that the free world can now unite, if not, I fear the consequences will be severe.



Yes, that is an old movie – Drone technology has put a new twist on both surveillance, and privacy issues, NDAA has made us a de-facto police state, and the Muslim in the whitehouse has allowed Islamists to infiltrate government and the military, like a bad case of termites.  Now to find out that for two years, the FBI, U.S. Marshalls, and other law enforcement agencies have had a radar system that can see through the walls of your abode… the noose is tightening.


New police radars can ‘see’ inside homes

The judges expressed alarm that agents had used the new technology without a search warrant, warning that “the government’s warrantless use of such a powerful tool to search inside homes poses grave Fourth Amendment questions.”

At least 50 U.S. law enforcement agencies have secretly equipped their officers with radar devices that allow them to effectively peer through the walls of houses to see whether anyone is inside, a practice raising new concerns about the extent of government surveillance.

Those agencies, including the FBI and the U.S. Marshals Service, began deploying the radar systems more than two years ago with little notice to the courts and no public disclosure of when or how they would be used. The technology raises legal and privacy issues because the U.S. Supreme Court has said officers generally cannot use high-tech sensors to tell them about the inside of a person’s house without first obtaining a search warrant.

The radars work like finely tuned motion detectors, using radio waves to zero in on movements as slight as human breathing from a distance of more than 50 feet. They can detect whether anyone is inside of a house, where they are and whether they are moving.

Current and former federal officials say the information is critical for keeping officers safe if they need to storm buildings or rescue hostages. But privacy advocates and judges have nonetheless expressed concern about the circumstances in which law enforcement agencies may be using the radars — and the fact that they have so far done so without public scrutiny.

Post Continues on



The following are just some excerpts from the main article.  Ignore at your -OUR- own peril.  “X”

The technology of agricultural genetic engineering (GE) is the controversial practice of gene-splicing and disrupting the genetic blueprints of plants and trees in a lab, to produce patented seeds. The seeds are generally one of two types. One type, which includes Monsanto’s Roundup-resistant crops, produces plants that survive the spraying of poisons, while all the other plants around them die. The other type produces a plant that manufactures its own pest-killing poison, designed to target a specific pest.

In 1994, Monsanto’s minions in the FDA (including Monsanto lawyer, and later Obama Food Czar, Michael Taylor) forced onto the market the controversial recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone (rBGH). rBGH was marketed to dairy farmers who injected the hormone into dairy cows to force them to produce more milk. It was brought to market, despite mounting evidence of increased antibiotic resistance and cancer risks, and over the objections of the General Accounting Office (Congress’ watchdog agency), and the Consumers Union, the Cancer Prevention Coalition and the Pure Food Campaign. Although approved for sale in the U.S., rBGH was subsequently banned in Europe, Canada, and most industrialized nations.

In allowing supposedly safe “maximum residue limits” and “average daily intake” (ADI) levels of toxic poisons like Roundup in our food and water, government regulators are recklessly ignoring the fact that most (non-organic) foods today, GMO and non-GMO alike, are being sprayed with Roundup, either as an herbicide or a pre-harvest desiccant. The nearly omnipresent accumulation of these Roundup residues in produce, processed foods, meat and animal products (unless they are organic) is extremely hazardous, causing birth defects, gene mutations, chromosomal aberrations and cancer. They destroy our essential gastrointestinal biome (gut) health by killing off the beneficial microorganisms and bacteria in our stomach and promoting the “bad” microorganisms that can lead to gastrointestinal disorders, obesity, diabetes, heart disease, depression, autism, infertility, and Alzheimers. (“The Myths of Safe Pesticides,” pp.69-70).

Moreover Monsanto and the pesticide industry conveniently hide the fact that hormone receptors in human body cells often “misidentify” tiny parts-per-billion, or even parts-per-trillion, of pesticides as if they are human hormones, converting these pesticide residues into potent and deadly hormone disruptors. In other words, there really is no “safe limit” for Roundup or other pesticide residues in human food, animal feed, municipal drinking water or breast milk.

An increasing number of scientists and consumer advocates warn that current gene-splicing techniques are crude, inexact and unpredictable, and that the toxic chemicals, especially Monsanto’s Roundup, sprayed on these genetically engineered seeds and plants are incredibly dangerous. In October 2013, more than 200 scientists, physicians, academics and experts from disciplines relevant to the scientific, legal, social and safety assessment GMOs issued a statement which said, “we strongly reject claims by GM seed developers and some scientists, commentators, and journalists that there is a ‘scientific consensus’ on GMO safety and that the debate on this topic is ‘over.'”

It is now blatantly obvious that GMOs are nothing more than patented Pesticide Delivery Systems (PDS) designed to increase sales of poisonous agrochemicals such as Roundup, glufosinate, Bt, 2,4 D and neonicotinoids. To claim that GMOs are perfectly safe is equivalent to saying that pesticides, herbicides and fungicides—systemically laced at ever-higher levels into GMO-tainted human food and animal feed—are perfectly safe. And to make matters worse, hundreds of millions of pounds of Monsanto’s Roundup, the most widely used herbicide in the world, are now routinely sprayed on 160 different crops, just before harvest, including wheat, potatoes, oats, canola, flax, peas and dried beans. In other words, just about every non-organic item in your supermarket, or every item on your restaurant menu (bread, potatoes, meat, milk,) is now tainted with Roundup.

A 12-point agenda for driving GMOs off the market

The anti-GMO and organic Movement has come a long way in the past two decades. But given the dangers posed by GMOs and Roundup, it’s time to move aggressively forward. Here are a dozen crucial steps we need to take in 2015 to drive GMOs and Roundup off the market.

1.    Stop Congress from passing the Pompeo bill (HR #4432) in 2015, which would take away states rights to pass mandatory GMO food labeling bills, and make it legal for unscrupulous food and beverage companies to continue mislabeling  GMO-tainted foods as “natural” or “all natural.”

2.    Stop Congress from “fast-tracking” and passing secretly negotiated “Free Trade” agreements (the TPP-Trans-Pacific Partnership, and TTIP-Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership) that would weaken consumer and states rights to label and safety test GMO and factory-farmed foods.

3.    Pass more state laws requiring mandatory labels on GMOs.

4.    Pass more bans on GMOs, neonicotinoids and pesticides at the township, city, and county levels.

5.    Support Vermont, Maui (Hawaii), Jackson and Josephine counties (Oregon) in their federal and state legal battles to uphold their laws requiring labels and/or bans on GMOs.

6.    Educate the public on the dangers and cruelty of GMO-fed, factory-farmed meat, dairy and egg products, and organize a “Great Boycott” of all factory-farmed foods.

7.    Support mandatory state legislation to label dairy products and chain restaurant food coming from factory farms or CAFOs (Confined Animal Feeding Operations).

8.    Pressure retail natural food stores and coops to follow the lead of Whole Foods Market and the Natural Grocer to label and/or ban all GMO-derived foods, including meat and animal products and deli foods, from their stores.

9.    Pressure restaurants to follow the lead of organic/grass fed restaurants and ban, or at least label, all GMO ingredients.

10.    Support consumer efforts to test for Roundup/glyphosate contamination in drinking water, human urine, breast milk, and in non-GMO food products such as wheat, potatoes, oats, peas, lentils and dry beans that are currently sprayed with Roundup before harvest.

11.    Educate the public on the positive health, environmental, ethical and climate-friendly (greenhouse gas sequestering) attributes of organic, grass-fed, and pasture-raised food and farming.

12.    Boycott the “Traitor Brand” products of the Grocery Manufacturers Association, International Dairy Foods Association, and the Snack Food Association.

Ronnie Cummins is international director of the Organic Consumers Association and its Mexico affiliate, Via Organica

Do you still want to remain their pawn?


The Ripening Wanderer

The Clockwork Conservative

All wound up about politics, history, culture... lots of stuff.


at the Re-Birth of America!

ON MY WATCH - the writings of SamHenry

A Writer's Take on Global and National Issues with Background Information and Humor As Needed

Once Written

A Political Blog

Welcome to the Right Central

Under Construction.

purveyor of space kablooie stories.

Truth in Palmyra

By Wally Fry

Truth and Shadows

Following the white rabbit

Pacific Paratrooper

This site is Pacific War era information


The best in WWII aviation history

BUNKERVILLE | God, Guns and Guts Comrades!

God, Guns and Guts Comrades!

Aces Flying High

An Aussie's travels to air shows, aviation museums and related events around the world, with a bit of aerospace history along the way!

Eyes on Europe & Middle East

Des regards croisés sur l'Europe et le Moyen Orient

Doc Baize

Give me liberty or give me death!



Chastisement 2014

He is ready to separate the chaff from the wheat with his winnowing fork


The Take Down Of America

The Dangers of Allah

Confused about Islam, Muslims, Taqiyya, Kitman, The Islamic State, and Sharia? I've spent 14 years studying these confused beings.  They are not at all what they want us to believe, especially those who are ruled by al Qaeda , ISIS and the Muslim Brotherhood as well as those who commit overt and covert Jihad while practicing Sharia tortures upon women

Treason Among Us

A blog by Guido Volante Author of "Treason Among Us; Secrets of the S.E.C."

The Counter Jihad Report

News ~ Resources ~ Activism

Documenting the Islamization of America

Digestible Politics

Politics Made Easy!

A Conservative Christian Man

Stand for Your Belief or it is Not a Belief but an Excuse

sharia unveiled

illuminating minds

We Moved > Go To:


%d bloggers like this: