Archive for September, 2014

Sick of being sick? Fight GMO’S!

To all PAN members

“X” here. I took this valuable information from one Doug Hill who represents an independent research group called the Laissez Faire Club. I edited this article for content, as it is an ad for their monthly publication, Laissez Faire Letter. Much of the enlarged font is my emphasis, though some is as contained in their ad.

They are fighting Obama, the FDA, the Federal Reserve… and all their accomplices in Washington who continue to obfuscate the evidence and support Monsanto’s GMO program.

This insidious agribusiness must be stopped.

It corroborates much of the info I obtain from a consumer group Organic Consumers Association, – AKA Organic Bytes-  whose reports I’ve blogged on PWE.

Here is an excerpt from a post I made on Dec 31st 2013:

2014 is shaping up to be a decisive year for the future of food and farming.  Grassroots activists are gearing up for new legislative battles, including state GMO labeling laws and county bans on growing genetically engineered crops. Meanwhile the multinational food corporations last month raised the stakes in the ongoing David vs. Goliath battle by petitioning the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) to allow companies to continue to label or market products that contain genetically modified organisms (GMOs) as “natural.” And all signs point to efforts by industry and the FDA to float either voluntary, or watered-down mandatory GMO labeling laws that would take away states’ rights to impose strict GMO labeling laws, and also exempt a large percentage of GMO ingredients from labeling.  [For related articles and more information, please visit OCA’s Genetic Engineering page, and our Millions Against Monsanto page. ]

Below is Doug Hill‘s Whistleblowing article:

You Can Either Take Action or Continue to Trust Big Seed Companies and the FDA.

Did you know that Monsanto has a long history of deceiving the public just to make money?

This is the same company that said its chemical PCB was safe.

You may have heard about the scandal in Anniston, Alabama. For nearly 40 years, Monsanto routinely dumped a toxic chemical called PCB into the town’s landfill and creek.

Those who lived closest to the Monsanto plant got cancer and liver problems.

While the company told the public PCB was safe, internal memos showed the company knew it was highly toxic.

Thousands of pages of company documents – many containing warnings such as “CONFIDENTIAL: Read and Destroy” — show that for decades, the company concealed what it did and what it knew.

In 1975, for example, a company study found that PCBs caused tumors in rats. They ordered its conclusion changed from “slightly tumorigenic” to “doesn’t appear to be cause cancer.”

In one of the internal memos, one of the managers justified the company’s despicable actions by saying “we can’t afford to lose one dollar of business.”

No wonder Monsanto is known as “the most evil corporation in the world.” They have proved time and time again that no price is too high to pay when it comes to achieving their profit goals… even when the price is that of human lives.

And that’s not the only example.

The company has also sold other highly toxic products, such as Agent Orange, DDT, and Aspartame. And the company said they were all safe for humans.

But today, Agent Orange and DDT are outlawed due to the massive damage they cause to human life. Agent Orange, for example, has killed and maimed an estimated 400,000 people and lead to 500,000 birth defects.

And scientific research has linked Aspartame to birth defects, cancer, diabetes, emotional disorders and seizures.

Today, Monsanto is the leader in genetically modified seeds. And they say GM food is safe.

Given their track record, I wouldn’t trust them if I were you.

Why gamble with your and your family’s health when there are so many other alternatives to the potentially toxic goods of the big agricultural firms?

And remember… if you trust the FDA, you’re essentially putting your trust in these companies.

The food we’re eating may be causing us and our loved ones to die early deaths, despite having some of the world’s best health care.

Despite all the evidence and the growing concerns of genetically engineered crops, government officials continue to rubber stamp their approval.

In other words, you shouldn’t expect anyone in the government to ensure the safety of your food…

Because our food supply is under control of cronies… giant food corporations that dominate food and farm policy at the White House, USDA, FDA, and EPA.

And all they care about is making money. They don’t give a damn about your health.

We Don’t Even Have the Right to
Know What’s In Our Food

For years, polls have shown that about 93% of Americans support the labeling of foods that contain genetically modified organisms.

But the biotech industry, with the help of the FDA, has decided that we don’t need to know when there are potentially harmful ingredients in our food. So, GM foods are not required to carry identifying labels.

We are being denied the fundamental right to know what’s in our food – a right that more than 50 other nations, including China and Russia, offer their citizens.

It’s estimated that 70% of processed foods contains genetically modified organisms. But because of the lack of labels, Americans have no clue.

By keeping us completely in the dark, these GMO companies are essentially controlling our diet.

As a result, millions of American infants, children and adults are unknowingly consuming potentially dangerous food products each day.

Americans get sick more often than Europeans and people in other industrialized countries.

And since the mid-1990s, the number of Americans suffering from chronic diseases, such as heart disease, asthma, cancerand diabetes, has nearly doubled.

America’s infant mortality has increased and life span has plunged.

Why is this happening? What has changed over the last two decades that could possibly explain this huge downward spiral in the health of our nation?

Well, one thing definitely changed in the mid-1990s: the food we eat.

A little over twenty years ago, scientists started tinkering with our food supply, taking genes from one species and forcing it into the DNA of other species…

Creating new organisms that did not exist in nature… organisms that are now part of the majority of the food we eat.

I’m talking about crops that have been genetically engineered to either produce their own pesticides or withstand mega doses of herbicides.

They came with the promise they would increase crop yields and profits. So, many in the farm community welcomed this innovation.

As a result, starting in 1996, these genetically modified organisms, or GMOs, spread rapidly through U.S. fields.


This was also a big bonanza for the biotech firms that developed these crops.

You see, genetically engineered seeds are patentable. So the companies that develop these seeds can have total control of the market. This represents billions in sales.

For example, take a look at a company named Monsanto. With a 90% market share, it dominates the GMO industry.

And farmers who purchase Monsanto’s patented GMO seeds have to sign a contract. This agreement forbids farmers from keeping any new seed produced by the crop for the following year, or even saving leftover seeds.

In other words, farmers must agree to use the seeds for one-time only. This basically ensures a perpetual stream of cash flow for the company because farmers will have to buy new seeds every year.

It was a win-win situation for the farmers and biotech firms. The farmers get bigger crops that can grow in any conditions. The biotech firms make money selling their seeds.

And boy, did it produce profits…

Take a look at this chart of Monsanto’s share price over the past 15 years…


A lot of people got very rich, and very powerful selling these genetically modified crops. There’s a lot of money at stake here.

According to new scientific evidence, these genetically modified crops may be extremely dangerous to our families.

And just like people used to smoke cigarettes because they had no idea it could kill them, most Americans today are eating this food because they are unaware of the risks.

They do it because government agencies, such as the Food and Drug Administration (or FDA), have said these genetically modified crops are safe.

But can we trust them?

The FDA has actually never conducted any studies on humans to prove this food is safe.

In other words, this government agency has intentionally unleashed a host of potentially harmful foods onto American dinner tables.

I know this may be hard to believe…

But 44,000 pages of internal memos from the FDA show its own scientists agreed that GMOs could create unpredictable, unsafe, and hard-to-detect allergens, toxins, diseases, and nutritional problems.

The Secret Killer in Your Food


About 80% of your immune system resides in your gut.

The gut is the main interface between our body and any kind of food.

So, if for any reason, your body sees food as an alien object, something that cannot be found in nature…

Your immune system might attack it, creating an inflammatory reaction. In other words, inflammation flares up whenever your body feels threatened.

Well, it turns out…. Since 1996, when GM foods were introduced into our diet, several digestive disorders related to gut inflammation have skyrocketed.  [ABOVE  GRAPHS]

Is this just a coincidence? Well, think about this for a moment…

Scientists have changed the gene sequence of some of the food we eat, making it a foreign object… So it shouldn’t be a surprise that our immune system might be reacting to this new kind of food, causing inflammation.

And that’s a big deal because the health damages can go well beyond diseases related to digestion.

Inflammation has been linked to a number of health problems.

In fact, recent medical research shows that hidden inflammation, the kind that originates in your gut, is at the root of ALL chronic illness we experience – conditions like heart disease, obesity, diabetes, dementia, depression, cancer, and even autism.

Maybe that explains why autism has increased 600% since GM foods came on the market… or why the number of Americans with diabetes has nearly tripled in the past two decades…

That’s why TIME magazine has called inflammation “the secret killer”. According to the magazine,

“It destabilizes cholesterol deposits in the coronary arteries, leading to heart attacks and potentially even strokes.”

It chews up nerve cells in the brains of Alzheimer’s victims. It may even foster the proliferation of abnormal cells and facilitate their transformation into cancer.”

“In other words, chronic inflammation may be the engine that drives many of the most feared illnesses of middle and old age.

Inflammation happens for a reason… it happens when a bacterium or toxin or some other irritant triggers an immune response.

Several studies have shown that genetically modified food is triggering that response.

Dr. P. M. Bhargava, one of the world’s top biologists, has reviewed 600 scientific journals. He concluded that GM foods in the US are largely responsible for the increase in many serious diseases.

Dr. Robin Bernhoft, a Harvard-trained doctor and director of the Bernhoft Center for Advanced Medicine in Ojai, California, has found that patient health improves when GM foods are removed from their diet.

Dr. Miguel Gonzalez, a physician in California, believes that “genetically modified foods are causing inflammation of the bowel.”

Research from the American Academy of Environmental Medicine states that

“several animal studies indicate serious health risks associated with GM food consumption including infertility, immune dysfunction, accelerated aging, dysfunction of cholesterol synthesis, insulin regulation, and protein formation, and changes in the liver, kidney, spleen
and gastrointestinal system.”

Many scientists believe that GM food is what’s triggering inflammation.

And if you don’t address that properly, you may end up with coronary artery disease, arthritis, cancer and other chronic illnesses.

We’ve All Become Unwitting Guinea Pigs In
An Experiment of Massive Proportions

Take soybeans, for example.

Scientists took genes from bacteria and inserted into the DNA of soy, creating a new kind of crop that can withstand mega doses of an herbicide called Roundup.

They call it Roundup-ready soy… and it accounts for 94% of soybeans in the U.S.

So, farmers can spray these crops as often as they like. The herbicide will kill all weeds, but leave the soy plants intact.

This is great because the farmers who buy Roundup-ready soy also have to buy Roundup, which is the company’s best-selling herbicide.

As you can probably imagine, this scheme is very lucrative for biotech companies.

The only problem is that new studies show that GM soy can be dangerous to your health.

You might say “but I don’t eat a lot of soy products, so what’s the big deal?”

Well, did you know soy is in a thousand places we might never expect it, usually in the form of “vegetable oil”? You’ll find it in salad dressings, soups, and imitation meat products.

In fact, if you or anyone in your family eats any kind of processed food, such as cereals, cookies, cakes, chips, crackers, muffins, mac n’ cheese, chicken nuggets, it’s very likely you’re eating genetically modified soy.

And numerous studies with animals have showed that…

It Can Cause Damage in the Liver,
Lung, and Pancreas

UK scientists at the York Nutritional Laboratory have linked GM soy to digestion problems, headache, lethargy, acne, and eczema. And they sounded the alarm saying that their findings “provide real evidence that GM food could have a tangible, harmful impact on the human body.”

And a human study from the U.S. National Academy of Sciences said that parts of the altered gene in GM soy went on to live in our gut. The study concluded this has the potential to change our immune system in unpredictable ways.

Dr. John Boyles, an allergy specialist from Ohio, says “GM soy is so dangerous that I tell people never to eat it.”

Even babies are at risk…

Because soy is used in 25% of all baby formulas in the US. Dr. Daniel Sheehan, a toxicologist formerly with the FDA, has warned that infants who drink this formula are part of a “large, uncontrolled and basically unmonitored human infant experiment.”

One easy step you can take is to avoid processed or packaged foods.

You see, aside from soybeans, in the U.S., 90% of sugar beets and 88% of corn are also genetically modified.

These items are basic components of pretty much everything you can find in a grocery store. So, every time you or your family eat processed or packaged food, there’s a good chance you’re taking a bite of a GM ingredient.

You Could Be Eating a
Dangerous Toxin Every Day

Just like soy, corn also seems to be everywhere. High-fructose corn syrup lurks in foods that don’t seem “corny” to us: candy, breads, ketchup, granola bars, and even English muffins.

While soy has been genetically modified to withstand herbicides, corn has been genetically modified to produce its own insecticide.

Scientists took genes from a bacterium that produces an insecticide and inserted it into corn. With that new genetic material, the corn can produce its own bacterial toxins, called Bt protein.

It’s a toxin that’s design to break open the stomach of insects that try to eat the corn. So, the corn’s cells produce a toxic protein that kills bugs.

The crop itself is the pesticide.

When I discovered this information, the first thing that came to my mind was…

“Wait a second… if this toxin destroys the insect’s gut, could it do the same to me and my family?”

According to the FDA, this corn is safe. They say Bt protein is toxic only to insects. But there’s new evidence that shows Bt protein could damage humans as well.

A recent study published in the International Journal of Biological Sciences concluded that GM corn damages the liver and kidneys.

The Journal of Hematology Diseases published research showing that it destroys red blood cells, disrupt blood clotting and cause organ degeneration and tissue damage in mice.

Joe Cummins, Professor Emeritus of Genetics at the University of Western Ontario, has also concluded that the Bt toxin could damage the small intestine.

And UK’s Institute of Science in Society has said that Bt “kills human kidney cells” and that its approval was based on “inadequate safety assessments.”

No wonder genetically modified corn is already outlawed in Hungary, Austria, Germany, Greece, and Luxembourg.

But Americans are unknowingly consuming this Bt toxin every single time they eat something that has GM corn in it.


Just look at these rats… they were fed genetically modified corn… the same corn you buy from the grocery store… and feed your family.

In this particular study, GM corn caused rats to develop horrifying tumors, widespread organ damage, and premature death.

Rats that ate GM corn saw four times the number of deaths and an 80% increase in cancer compared to those that ate conventional corn.

Despite all this shocking evidence, agricultural companies and the FDA continue to claim that GM corn is safe because, according to them, our body naturally degrades the Bt toxin.

If that’s true, then how can you explain the fact that toxic pesticides from GM food crops have been found in unborn babies?

In a study that analyzed dozens of samples from women, scientists found traces of the toxin in 93% of the pregnant mothers and in 80% of the umbilical cords.

The research suggested the chemicals were entering the body through eating meat, milk and eggs from farm livestock that were fed GM corn.

And UK’s The Telegraph reported that the study’s conclusion “appears to contradict the food industry’s long-standing claim that any potentially harmful chemicals added to crops would pass safely through the body.”

The strong link between government and big corporations that produce GM food:

Big corporations, lobbyists and politicians will do anything to keep you in the dark. Why? Because there’s big money involved. That’s the cold truth of our food supply.

If word gets out that genetically modified foods are potentially dangerous, the food companies’ billions of dollars in profits will be in SERIOUS jeopardy.

The genetically modified crop market is huge. In the last decade alone, Monsanto, which controls 90% of the market, has made more than $116 billion in sales.

And they use a lot of that money to make sure nobody will interfere with their business.

In recent years they have spent over $52 million in lobbying to make sure they get the most favorable legislation possible.

And that has paid off… as the New York Times said, “the White House worked behind the scenes to help Monsanto get the regulations that it wanted.”

The company is also a very prolific user of Washington DC’s “revolving door.”

The FDA, for example, welcomes past and future executives from the food industry.

In other words, giant corporations literally send employees to go work for the FDA and other regulatory agencies, where they can write food policies that will favor the companies.

To this date, the current Deputy Commissioner for Policy at the FDA is a former Monsanto employee.

As a key regulator in charge of food safety, he has the ability to control what does and doesn’t show up on your family’s table.

Don’t you think that having someone from one of these corporations in charge of food policies represents a huge conflict of interest?

Thanks to these intimate links with government agencies, food corporations could be…

Using You and Your Family as Lab Rats

In 1992, when the FDA approved GMOs, the agency claimed there was an overall consensus among scientists that GM food was safe.

But now we know that’s a big lie.

In 1998 a lawsuit forced 44,000 pages of internal files from the FDA into the public domain.

These memos reveal that the consensus was the exact opposite. Scientists urged the FDA to do long-term safety studies to guard against possible allergies, toxins, new diseases, and nutritional problems.

For example, FDA scientists recommended testing every GM food “before it enters the marketplace” because of “the possibility of unexpected, accidental changes in genetically engineered plants.”

According to one of the memos, Dr. Linda Kahl, an FDA compliance officer, warned the agency that “the processes of genetic engineering lead…to different risks.”

And Dr. Jim Maryanski, the FDA Biotechnology Coordinator at the time, admitted that there was no consensus about the safety of genetically engineered foods in the scientific community.

But bureaucrats at the FDA ignored the scientists’ warnings and allowed GM food crops onto the market.

Dr. Maryanski also admitted that the approval of GMOs was based on politics, not science. He said that “the determination whether a new protein is safe can be made by the company.”

In other words, the FDA- the agency so many naïve Americans think is here to protect us- allowed food companies to determine the safety of GM food.

But one of Monsanto’s own executives said at the time that “Monsanto should NOT have to vouch the safety of biotech food. Our interest is in selling as much of it as possible.

Dr. Philip Regal, a professor at the University of Minnesota and an internationally recognized plant expert once stated: “Over the last fifteen years, I and other scientists have put the FDA on notice about the potential dangers of genetically engineered foods.”

According to Andrew Kimbrell, who at the time was Executive Director of the International Center for Technology Assessment, “by failing to require testing and labeling of genetically engineered foods, the FDA has made consumers unknowing guinea pigs for potentially harmful food substances.”

And a report by eight renowned international experts concluded that “agricultural GM companies and evaluation committees systematically overlook the side effects of GMOs and pesticides.”

The study also says they greatly underestimate “the initial signs of diseases like cancer and diseases of the hormonal, immune, nervous and reproductive systems, among others.”

And it gets worse… the food industry’s control goes well beyond the government.

Keeping the American Public in the Dark

Big food companies provide funding to most food research, conferences, and fellowships.

This private funding certainly seems to affect the way professors and scientists think, act, and publish.

Researchers have a huge incentive to write only good things about GM crops, otherwise they may lose funding… or even worse, their jobs.

A study from Food and Water Watch concluded that this corporate funding “taints the independence and objectivity of agricultural research.”

These companies have also been systematically blocking researchers from using its patented gene modified seeds.

According to Doug Sherman of the Union of Concerned Scientists, “multibillion-dollar agricultural corporations, including Monsanto and Syngenta, have often refused to provide independent scientists with seeds, or they’ve set restrictive conditions that severely limit research options.”

26 researchers from different universities even wrote a letter to the Environmental Protection Agency protesting restricted access to seeds. The letter states that “no truly independent research can be legally conducted on many critical questions involving these crops. The biotech industry is completely driving the bus.”

The magazine Scientific American has also reported that “only studies that the seed companies have approved ever see the light of a peer-reviewed journal. In a number of cases, experiments that had the implicit go-ahead from the seed company were later blocked from publication because the results were not good.”

In order words, these companies basically choose who gets to do research and what topics are studied and published.

They also try to destroy the reputation and careers of any scientists who stand in their way.

Perhaps, biologist Arpad Pusztai is the best example. He had more than 300 articles and 12 books to his credit and was the world’s top expert in his field.

In the 1990s, he conducted a study that showed that rats that ate GM potatoes developed potentially pre-cancerous cell growth, smaller brains and testicles, partially atrophied livers, and damaged immune systems.

After his shocking discovery, he decided to reveal his findings on national TV.

Two days later he was fired and silenced with threats of a lawsuit. His team was dismantled. And the government, with the help of big corporations, launched a smear campaign to destroy his reputation.

Many other scientists have been threatened and fired from their jobs as well.

That’s why University of California at Berkeley professor Ignacio Chapela says that “it’s very hard for us to publish in this field. People are scared.”

That’s a big reason why most Americans have no idea how dangerous GM foods are.


Corn used to be one of my favorite foods. Soybeans used to be a healthy food, as was soybean oil.  I stopped eating corn years ago when I found out about Monsanto, and unfortunately, you will find it – in the form of “high fructose corn syrup”- in many packaged / processed foods, even bread. BE A LABEL READER, for you and your loved ones health. Two thirds of what is now on the grocers shelves is on my OFF list  !! 

Please take this seriously; take care, “X”

 Updated on 9-23-16



Thank God for the fifth amendment.

Self-Incrimination Clause

The Fifth Amendment’s right against self-incrimination permits an individual to refuse to disclose information that could be used against him or her in a criminal prosecution. The purpose of this right is to inhibit the government from compelling a confession through force, coercion, or deception. The Self-Incrimination Clause applies to any state or federal legal proceeding, whether it is civil, criminal, administrative, or judicial in nature. This privilege is frequently invoked during the trial phase of legal proceedings, where individuals are placed under oath and asked questions on the witness stand.

The privilege is also asserted with some frequency during the pretrial phase of legal proceedings. In the pretrial phase of criminal cases, it is usually asserted in response to pointed questions asked by law enforcement agents, prosecutors, and other government officials who are seeking to determine the persons responsible for a particular crime. During the pretrial phase of civil cases, parties may assert the right against self-incrimination when potentially damaging questions are posed in depositions and interrogatories.


What Price Liberty?

The Regime has aided and abetted our worst ememies, jeopardized our economy with crushing debt, has placed muslims with known terrorist ties in high places of government, and continually tries to subvert the Constitution by signing onto U.N. (world court) rules, while ignoring “We The People”. Font size/color changed by me for clarity.  “X”

This post from PAN admin Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer:

Admin II

What Price Liberty?

The Liberty Bell.

The first inscription on The Liberty Bell is a Bible verse taken from the book of Leviticus 25:10 and it reads, “Proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all inhabitants thereof.”

America’s Founding Fathers faced a superior, world-class foe, and increasing taxation and regulatory oppression (they fought a war predicated on a 2% tax on tea!)…and by the grace and will of God won their hard-fought Liberty.

Today our own government is taxing, regulating and oppressing far more than Britain ever did.

We have many voices crying out for Liberty. 

Some are crying out for major gutting of taxes. 

Some (myself included) want the Federal Reserve, IRS, and Income Tax abolished and a 7%-12% National Sales tax to replace it.

Others want massive gutting of government spending (I am one of them too).

Others want to abolish all non-Constitutional Cabinet and Bureau posts, (count me in again).

Others are rallying to abolish Obama-Care and Impeach/Imprison Obama, (definitely count me in).

Others want to rally the vote and toss out all the Liberals we can in The Senate and The House, and in Governorships as well, (Yep, all for it).

Others are pushing for States to nullify ALL non-Constitutional laws, (support that 100%).

Lastly, there are a growing number considering Secession, (which I am NOT for…yet).

Here is one article and it is from a Liberal MSM source on secession-

Quarter of Americans OK With Seceding


Could the US see a Scotland-like secession vote of its own? Nearly a quarter of Americans wouldn’t have a problem with that, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll. Some 23.9% of us strongly or somewhat support secession for our states, Reuters reports. That’s compared to 53.3% who strongly oppose, or tend to oppose, the idea. The idea of leaving the country is most popular among Republicans and rural Americans in the Western US, and President Obama’s policies are a major reason for it. But plenty of Democrats—some 21%—would also lean toward seceding.

“When I say secede, I’m not like (ex-NRA head) Charlton Heston with my gun up in the air … It’s more like we could do it if we had to,” and it’s a way of getting Washington to listen up, says a Texas Democrat. Some 29% of Republicans, meanwhile, back the idea. “I have totally, completely lost faith in the federal government, the people running it, whether Republican, Democrat, independent, whatever,” notes one.  Geographically, Americans in the Southwest are most supportive of the idea, with some 34.1% of people backing it; New England is least supportive, at 17.4%.




First though, let us look at our Declaration of Independence and see what America’s Founders said…and fought a war FOR-

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in
such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.— Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains
them to alter their former Systems of Government…

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms:

Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our
common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity.  We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.


Let me now post a call to Liberty I wrote 4 years ago-


Is there anything we hold dear? Dear enough to dream for? Dear enough to work for? to strive and fight for? Is there?

IF there is, then does it not stand to reason, impassioned reason though it be, that there IS then something worth working to KEEP? To strive and fight to KEEP?

Fellow Conservatives, in the last 97 years we have seen America slowly stripped of Constitutional right, liberty and privilege, one after the other. Because the progression was slow and tedious we did not always resist and fight against the tyrannical encroachment upon OUR God-given, Constitutionally-Codified Rights and Liberties. No. Because The Left worked meticulously, slowly, deliberately to fundamentally transform America from a Constitutional Republic to a Collectivist-Central Planning Tyranny we fought little, if at all.

The Left first wrecked havoc on the source of America’s Currency and the Regulating thereof via the Federal Reserve. Next they attacked America’s wage earners, America’s Producers, with the Income Tax/IRS.

Once that was in place, the controlling of America’s Currency, Profits and wage-earning, when the financial collapse came that those policies CREATED, the same Liberals that CREATED the crisis promised to “solve the crisis” with Welfare, Entitlements, Gov. Works Projects, and other Gov. programs.

BUT WHAT that meant was that The Left NOW had justification to RAISE TAXES YET MORE…which impoverished and enslaved America yet more…to the Government that had CREATED THE CRISIS!

The Cycle of ever encroaching Tyrannical Government was now in place, sanctioned by “law”, and entrenched:
Institute New Gov. Programs to “solve” the Gov. CREATED Crisis…and then start anew and repeat.

Fellow Patriots, Conservatives, let me ask again:
IS there anything that WE hold dear, that WE deem worthy to fight to KEEP?

I know not what course others may choose, but as for me and my house…WE CHOOSE LIBERTY!

OUR Houses.
OUR Lands.
OUR Jobs, OUR Businesses.
OUR Families.
OUR Children.
OUR Rights.
OUR Liberty.
OUR Future.

…hang in the balance! What will we be found DOING?!! Will we sit about idly til we die or become so enslaved that we can then do NOTHING?!!

No. Again, as with the Patriot Fire-Brand of old:

Truly, WHAT have we been hesitant about? WHY have we been so slow to fight back? to resist this DELIBERATE attack & undermining of America’s Constitution, Heritage and Values? WHY have we been so at sleep at the wheel? Is it because we’ve been lulled into thinking that LIBERALS are “honorable, honest, America-Loving, Constitution-Following” people who simply have a different point of view?!!


That LIBERAL view of ever increasing taxes, regulations, intrusion into the FREE-Markets, PRIVATE Sector, and OUR Churches, Charities, Homes and Families. The LIBERAL view that America is EVIL and “deserves” severe punishment and to be “cut down to size”?!!


Are THOSE people really “honorable, honest, America-Loving, Constitution-Following-Patriots” with “just a different view-point”?!!


Fellow Conservatives We will NOT and can NOT WIN until we FIGHT BACK! And we will NOT fight back til we see The Left for THE ENEMY OF AMERICA AND OUR CONSTITUTION THAT THEY ARE!


Can America truly go in TWO OPPOSITE directions at the same time?!! Can America be BOTH Free and ENSLAVED at the same time? Lastly, can America truly MOVE TOWARD Tyrannical Oppression AND Constitutional Liberty AT THE SAME TIME?

The answer is plain.
The answer is simple.

WHEN you answer that question you WILL JOIN THE FIGHT TO SAVE AMERICA.


Patriots, Conservatives, Constitutionalists,

I have long written and worked to the end that Liberty, The Rule of Law and Constitutional Governance be restored to America, and to that end I have worked tirelessly since August 15th, 1976, and still do and will work and pray to that end. 

To me my God-given, Constitutionally Codified Liberties and Rights mean too much to not give my utmost for.

I urge ALL Conservatives to VOTE NOVEMBER 4TH!

I also make the call to BE actively engaged now on a daily basis. 

Let us prayerfully seek God…and then DO ALL we can to restore America.


My comment – Among other priorities, we ought to get the ( ! ) out of the globalist U.N.

Prisoner Photos_0002_2

Who the hell do these people think they are? I was struck by a bizarre mix of emotions – to horsewhip those responsible, and to cry.  War is a last resort option; if undertaken it is to annihilate the enemy; not to “nation-build”, win hearts and minds, or have our troops safety and efficacy compromised by globalist garbage.


Have you ever heard the name of Army National Guard Sergeant Derrick Miller? If not you need to know who he is.

Sgt. Derrick Miller was charged with the murder of an Afghan man who turned out to be a spying insurgent. He has been sentenced to life in a military prison with the possibility of parole for defending himself and saving his squad from an imminent attack. He was sentenced in 2011 and is imprisoned at Leavenworth.

According to the Free Derrick Miller website:

“During a combat mission in a hostile area of Afghanistan in September 2010, Sgt. Derrick Miller’s attention was drawn to an Afghan national who had penetrated the defense perimeter set up by the US Army. The Afghan man was positively identified by another soldier under Sgt. Miller’s command who recognized him from a detainment the previous day. The man in question was the driver of a truck reported by military intelligence as transporting members of the opposition to a nearby combat firefight. US military intelligence let the trucks pass.”

“Sgt. Miller was sent to question the Afghan national after observing the suspicious behavior of the man as he reconnoitered their defense perimeter. It appeared that the man was gathering information, and since he was already identified as an enemy combatant, Sgt. Miller was acting instinctively to protect his unit by detaining this man.”

“During the questioning, which took place in an open area with another US soldier and an Afghan interpreter present, Sgt. Miller asked the man why he was within the perimeter. The man initially claimed to be an electrician who was responding to a downed power line, but later claimed to be there to fix a water pump. He had no tools with him, and no apparent means of carrying out the repairs he was supposedly there to address. The man was originally observed accompanied by two men whom he claimed were his sons and helpers. Both of those men had returned to the village without having performed any electrical work, and both in separate directions. They were not present during Sgt. Miller’s questioning. During the harsh questioning, the Afghan insurgent attempted to grab Sgt. Miller’s weapon, and was shot and killed in the struggle.”

“Within a few hours, SGT Millers unit was attacked on three sides by Afghan insurgents. During Sgt. Miller’s trial, all the soldiers who appeared from his unit testified that the enemy had to have reconnoitered their position closely in order to attack in the manner they did. There was also testimony that the incident with Sgt. Miller forced the entire unit into full alert / 100% security, which prepared the soldiers for the attack. Because of Sgt. Miller’s actions, no American lives were lost due to the level of their preparation.”

“As the details of the events of that day came to light, the US soldiers were suspicious of the Afghan man and the two other young men with him that he claimed were his sons and helpers. Yet at different times during the few hours that the Afghan was inside the perimeter, each of these men were sent back to the village by different routes. The Afghan interpreter testified that this happened. It is believed by the soldiers present at the time that these two men were carrying information to the insurgents detailing the most effective targets for the ensuing attack.”

“Sgt. Miller believes, despite his conviction and sentence of life in prison for the murder of this Afghan insurgent, that he was acting solely in self-defense and with sound judgment.”

As a result of his wrongful conviction, Miller’s military career and personal life has been ruined. His two young daughters only get to see their father on occasion when they visit him in prison. Due to him being convicted of murder, his kids receive no military support or aid.

Sgt. Miller needs your help and support. Miller’s mom Renee keeps updates posted on his website and is trying to collect over 200 letters in support of Derrick that she can place on the desk of Rep. Chris Van Hollen. She has a sample letter you can use if you want. You can send your letters to Renee at . You can also write to your own congressmen in DC and ask them to look into Derrick’s case and fight for his freedom. I pray you take the time to help a real American hero. Sgt. Derrick Miller should be free and home with his two girls.

Read more at…

Posted on September 20, 2014 by Gary DeMar

The courts and their pontificating judges have gone crazy. We shouldn’t be surprised if judges who don’t know the difference between male and female anatomy don’t know the difference between America and Mexico and the American flag and a foreign flag:

“The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals let stand its February ruling in favor of Live Oak High School administrators, who argued that a history of problems on the Mexican holiday [Cinco de Mayo] justified the decision to act against the American flag-wearing students. Officials at the Morgan Hill school ordered the students to either cover up the shirts or go home, citing past threats and campus strife between Latino and white students that raised fears of violence.”

The principal of the school was afraid that there “‘there might be problems’ due to the American flag shirts.” The following is from RedState:

“This is a classic case of the heckler’s veto, something that is sadly prevalent on the left as Tolerance supplants God as the source of our morality, where a speaker is silenced by the government if a sufficiently loud opposition can be found. In this case, the students wearing the flag were faced with threats of violence and rather than punishing the racist thugs who were making the threats, free speech was prohibited. All of this in defense of a ‘holiday’ that has less cultural legitimacy than Kwanza.”

One more point needs to be made. The Mexican students accused the “white” students of “racism.”

“One Mexican student responded, “But [Principal] Rodriguez, they are racist. They are being racist. F*** them white boys. Let’s f*** them up.”

Mexicans are of the same race as “them white boys.” Their skin may be darker, but they are all Caucasians.

“Cinco de Mayo” – the fifth of May. What in Mexican history happened on this fateful day? “The date is observed to commemorate the Mexican army’s unlikely victory over French forces at the Battle of Puebla on May 5, 1862, under the leadership of General Ignacio Zaragoza Seguín. In the United States, Cinco de Mayo is generally mistaken to be Mexico’s Independence Day — the most important national holiday in Mexico — which is celebrated on September 16.”

It’s a Mexican holiday. As far as I can tell, it was never widely celebrated in Mexico.

“A 2007 UCLA Newsroom article notes that ‘The holiday, which has been celebrated in California continuously since 1863, is virtually ignored in Mexico. TIME magazine reports that ‘Cinco de Mayo started to come into vogue in 1940s America during the rise of the Chicano movement.’ The holiday crossed over from California into the rest of the United States in the 1950s and 1960s but didn’t gain popularity until the 1980s when marketers, especially beer companies, capitalized on the celebratory nature of the day and began to promote it. It grew in popularity and evolved into a celebration of Mexican culture and heritage, first in areas with large Mexican-American populations, like Los Angeles, Chicago, and Houston.”

Americans don’t generally celebrate events that took place in foreign countries. I’m Italian. My grandparents were born in Italy.

We never celebrated the Festa della Liberazione (Liberation Day), an annual national Italian holiday commemorating the 1945 liberation ending World War II in Italy. My parents never carried Italian flags into the schools they attended.

Of course, none of this means that the vast majority of Americans don’t appreciate Mexican culture, food, and festivals. Mexican restaurants are packed on the fifth of May.

What Americans resent is people from any country who hold their country in higher esteem than the country they are living in and benefiting from.

Read more at…

I did a “John Hancock” on this image; subject matter courtesy of  A Moral Outrage :

Senators-voted-with-UN2-240x300 - Copy

I suggest you do your due-diligence come this November…

Senate Bill 139 passed 53-46. 46 US Senators voted against this: “To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.” Wizbang reported:

Fortunately, the odious, anti-American treaty was again voted down by the full Senate, but 46 Senators voted in favor of handing over our Constitutional rights to the UN.

Senator Jim Inhofe (R-OK) offered Amendment 139 that was passed with a 53 to 46 vote. His Amendment contained language to affirm that foreign treaties would not trump the U.S. Constitution.

“Mr. President,” Inhofe said on the floor of the Senate, “I want to make sure that everyone understands what the United Nations trade treaty is. The trade treaty is a treaty that cedes our authority to have trade agreements with our allies in terms of trading arms.”

He went on to say, “I want to very briefly read this so nobody over there or over here misunderstands what this amendment does. This is right out of the amendment. Uphold the Second Amendment rights, that is one thing. And secondly, prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations arms trade treaties.”

But many Democrats simply didn’t agree with Inhofe’s insistence that the U.S. Constitution trump the UN. Forty-six Democrats-Independents favored ceding your Constitutional rights over to the United Nations. Unreal.

Isn’t it interesting they’re all Democrats? Naw, I’m not surprised, either.

First, this posting by PAN admin.  Bill Bissell:

Chairman Gowdy comes out swinging in first Benghazi hearing.

Another PAN member, John Pastirchak,  provided the link to this:  Petition to Draft Gowdy for House Speaker–

More than 100,000 patriotic Americans have already called for a conservative to lead the House of Representatives — our last line of defense against Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid.

Will you join the call to draft Trey Gowdy to be the next Speaker of the House – replacing John Boehner who has too often compromised and capitulated to with Barack Obama?


Enough of invertebrate John Boehner! Need encouragement?

Freedom Outpost just posted this as of the 17th:

House Speaker Boehner Preparing To Help ISIS…



Woman or Machine? Sophisticated Japanese She-Bot Blurs the Line

The technology most of us take for granted was non-existant a mere 40 years ago.

We now live in a time where technological advances are so swift as to make the term “planned obsolescence” itself an anachronism. I just read a column by Tea Party Economist blogger Gary North, posted today (9-15):

Is the Terminator Coming? Reflections on Moore’s Law

I invite you to read it first, before continuing.

Having read it in its entirety at his blog, (URL above) I was somewhat surprised by his views, and sent him an e-mail, reproduced here:

Today at 11:54 AM

Well over a year ago I happened to be discussing A.I. with a former Navy Seal. I didn’t ask him personal questions about his security clearance levels etc.; however, he’d know more about the government’s capabilities than us common folks. I had suggested that whatever was permitted in the public domain, the government was about ten years ahead of that info. He responded -ready?- with more like forty years. So with your column in mind:

Watch these videos!


Woman or Machine? Sophisticated Japanese She-Bot Blurs the Line…

Inside Watson’s brain…

Artificial-Intelligence Computer System ‘Watson’ Goes to College…


I look forward to a reply from him. The technology in itself is benign; however we’re crossing a threshold where there is no return, and this is another thing altogether when considering who might control it.

The video clips are going to “blow you away”…

Female Android Geminoid F

Ishiguro last made international headlines in 2006 when he made an android replica of himself, the Geminoid HI-1. For his pioneering work, CNN named him one of eight “geniuses who will change your life,” and the BBC chronicled his story in the 2008 documentary Man-Machine. Ishiguro says his new robot F, as he’s named her, is more elegant and approachable than his past creations.

(MORE: New Sprinting Humanoid Robot Will One Day Come with Flexible Arms and Tactile Skin)

The biggest difference between Ishiguro’s copy of himself and F are the number of actuators, or motor-like mechanisms, that control behaviors. Geminoid HI-1 boasts about 50, while F has only 12. This has dropped the cost from more than $1 million to $110,000, which Ishiguro hopes will help popularize the product. Scientists were able to simulate human-like behaviors using electronic signals in the robot’s built-in computer. The robotic twin can smile, frown and furrow her eyebrows, but most of the time the silicone-skinned clone just looks a little dazed.

Breaking-chains 1


I found the information on “QUO WARRANTO” on TEAM LAW

Charges using QUO WARRANTO has been brought against Obama, however, Congress seated him anyway, now they into Phase III, which is explained directly below this, I am also posting the information from CALL TO ACTION Phase III, scroll down for that information of what is be done now.  Time is very important, so please do this asap.  I hope we can move fast enough!  God Bless us and our Republic!

As of Monday, December 24, 2012, Phase 1 of a “Call to Action” began; when such letter was delivered to the AG and such an action was brought against Barrack Obama as President Elect contesting that he does not qualify for the office of President because he is not “a natural born Citizen”.  Respectively, Phase II began with a letter writing campaign wherein all of Congress was notified of that action; however, when Congress seated Obama in spite of the fact that Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” Phase III—“Operation Clean Sweep” began.  For more information, and to learn how you can help, click this link: “Call to Action”.  I have also gone to :  CALL TO ACTION and listed the information at the bottom of this message. 

Quo Warranto

Though the Latin phrase: “Quo Warranto” means: “By what authority”, it is also the title of one of the most ancient and important original styles of remedial court actions inherent to any sovereign; including (but not limited to) each of the people in the United States.  It is the ultimate means the people have to limit officials to acting within the confines of the authority lawfully provided them through their office.  Quo Warranto is generally executed through a writ or related court order.

Because all authority in government collectively comes from the individual sovereign people, any of the people, can always use a properly executed quo warranto action to remove any official from office; if said official violates the privileges of their official capacity by acting outside of the lawful bounds of their authority and/or fails to perform the required responsibilities of that office.  Respectively, the government cannot lawfully interfere with the right to quo warranto; accordingly, the inherent right is irrevocable, ongoing and cannot be lawfully obviated by any legislative act.

Thus, where all authority in government comes from the people, Quo Warranto remains a right retained by the people to ask, “By what authority”; and, the respective Writ of Quo Warranto is the remedial instrument used by the courts to remove any official from office when that official is, through quo warranto, found to have violated the privilege of that office by acting absent of or in contradiction to the authority of that office.

In the United States, the right, with its respective Writ, are reserved to the people through the 9th and 10th amendments.

Quo Warranto can be used to ask any of the following three questions regarding anyone holding any office:

  1. Did the officer acquire the office unlawfully?

  2. Did the officer fail to do anything the office required them to do?

  3. Did the officer do anything forbidden from them while in the office?

If the answer to any of those questions is, “Yes”, Quo Warranto applies; and, the court must issue the Writ of Quo Warranto; which removes the officer from the office.

Here is how a Quo Warranto action works to secure its remedy:

First, except in rare occasions, the action is always brought by the government; thus, when any official commits any act forbidden to his office, or fails to act as required by his office, any of the people can write a letter to the Attorney General (hereinafter, “AG”) [in some cases the District Attorney is appropriate] showing cause for the Quo Warranto action and requesting that the AG bring the action to secure a Writ of Quo Warranto against the officer.  Also, if the unlawful action in question personally aggrieved or injured a party that party can bring the action directly into the court by their own right as a personally aggrieved/injured party.

Second, the AG either brings the action requested or declines the request.

If the AG declines, either overtly or by tacit admission (by failing to act (bring the action in court) within a fortnight), the right to proceed with the action in court as an independent prosecutor for the AG’s office (with the AG’s full authority to prosecute the case) automatically passes to the party that made the request for action to the AG.

Third, the aggrieved party or the government [through the AG, an assistant AG or a special prosecutor for the AG’s office] files the action in court where the case must be given the top priority of the court (taking precedence over all other actions).

Forth, the Defendant (officer in question) is summoned to appear in court, usually within five days, where the Defendant must prove their authority to so act in the office in question.

Fifth, if the defendant fails to provide evidence at trial proving lawful authority for the action in question (i.e.: the answer to the questions above are, “No”), Quo Warranto applies and the judge has no choice but to issue the Writ of Quo Warranto, which ousts the defendant from office.  This is an important point; though the judge reviews the facts to determine whether the answer to any of the three questions was, ’Yes’, if “yes”, the judge has no choice; but, to apply the remedy by issuing the Writ that removes the officer from the office.

The court has no jurisdiction to determine either what the remedy will be or whether the remedy should be applied; they can only determine the answer to the questions, and if “yes” is the answer to any of the questions, execute the remedy; to fail to do so would make the judge subject to a Quo Warranto action.  You may notice that the right to Habeas Corpus is a lesser subset of the right to Quo Warranto.

As of Monday, December 24, 2012, Phase 1 of a “Call to Action” began; when such letter was delivered to the AG and such an action was brought against Barrack Obama as President Elect contesting that he does not qualify for the office of President because he is not “a natural born Citizen”.  Respectively, Phase II began with a letter writing campaign wherein all of Congress was notified of that action; however, when Congress seated Obama in spite of the fact that Obama is not a “natural born Citizen”

Phase III—“Operation Clean Sweep” began.  For more information, and to learn how you can help, click this link: “Call to Action”.

‘Call to Action, Phase III’

Postby Admin » Thursday January 16th, 2014 12:38 pm GMT

Call to Action!
Phase III — Operation Clean Sweep
Inspire as many people as possible to review this message!

When officers of government violate the law, exceed the authority provided through the Constitution or fail to follow their primary responsibilities to the people, it falls to the people to hold those officers accountable. However, the people generally have no idea how they can possibly accomplish that necessary task to keep government operating within the limitations prescribed by the Constitution.

Respectively, we hope this article will help every American understand how to exercise that most important obligation to hold such officers accountable to the limitations of the law and inspire you to learn and use the law of Quo Warranto to save our nation (click on the blue underlined linked text to learn more about Quo Warranto).

Respectively, given that the Constitution requires that no person other than “a natural born Citizen” can ever be lawfully seated as President, when Barrack Øbama was allegedly elected to, and seated in, that office, two factors became self-evident:

  1. Given that the only condition wherein the natural birth of a person defines their citizenship is that condition where both parents are citizens of the same country; thus, by definition, “a natural born Citizen of the United States” can only be born of a mother and a father both of whom are citizens of the United States.

    • Wherefore, because Barrack Øbama’s father was never a United States citizen, Barrack Øbama cannot lawfully qualify for the office of President of the United States; and,

  2. Given that Congress seated President Øbama, each member of Congress violated at least two of the Constitution’s mandates:

    1. they failed to vet the President Elect’s qualification to serve prior to seating a President; and,

    2. they seated Barrack Øbama as President even though he cannot possibly lawfully qualify for the office.

Thus, the people’s right to demand “Proof of authority!” through Quo Warranto applies to each member of Congress for both of those violations.
Now, remember this: a Writ of Quo Warranto only allows one remedy in law for such a failure — oustal from office. Therefore, it is time for the people to timely hold Congress accountable!

To that end, Phase III timing is incredibly critical!!!
To make a “clean sweep” of Congress, the congressmen still in office, that were in office when President Øbama was so seated, must be charged with Quo Warranto! Therefore, you, the people from each Congressional District must individually raise those charges!

The sooner the better—time is of the essence.

The more people that act as soon as they receive this message, the better the Clean Sweep effect.

The beauty of such actions is the people’s individual right to compel the government to provide proof of authority (by requesting a Writ of Quo Warranto) is protected by the 9th Article of Amendment of the United States Constitution, etc.. Respectively, such actions are brought in accord with the laws of the State; not, D.C. rules! And, that means that, in accord with State law, if the AG does not accept the responsibility for bringing the respective actions, then the parties across the nation that request the same automatically possess the authority (should they choose to exercise it) of proceeding in the case as special prosecutors for the AG\’s Office with the full authority of the AG\’s office to so prosecute their respective case. Due to the nature of the Quo Warranto action in law, there is nothing the AG, or the Court, can do to lawfully impede that process.

However, you can rest assured that no one in the “government” will do anything to remedy the woes the people face in America today—they will only make things worse! If you haven’t noticed; they seem hell bent on destroying the economy and usurping dictatorial control over every aspect of life in America; even if it takes civil war! Therefore, if you want to save the nation and its economy from war while you keep food on the table and fuel in the tanks, it is up to you to act—by using the law to hold Congress accountable!

Because, all authority in government collectively comes from the individual people; and, ultimately, It remains the obligation of the individual people to learn and apply their inherent rights [through the proper application of law] to compel the errant officers to prove their authority for their actions; especially when the government fails to lawfully manage itself and stay within the bounds of our Constitution’s Law. The bottom line, it is up to you, the individual, to use the law of Quo Warranto to demand (through the AG) that the government provide a Writ of Quo Warranto for each such violator that was charged with authority from you—which violators are the Congressmen representing the Congressional District where you live.

There is no time to wait; therefore, do your part:

  1. Send your Request:

    The following is a sample copy of the Request for Quo Warranto Letter others have sent: Sample letter.

    Use the following combined methods of delivery to send your request for Quo Warranto Action to the Attorney General:

    1. Most importantly, send a physical letter by certified mail with return receipt requested (see: content notarized mail).; and,

    2. Fax [with Cover Sheet] to: (301) 341-0779.

    Send each of the above to the U.S. Attorney General himself, Eric H. Holder, Jr., requesting that he institute a Quo Warranto action against each of the members of Congress from the congressional district where you live.
    You must remember; when using such a sample letter, you will need to at least change all of the yellow highlighted text to the appropriate information related to the specific congressional district (find your Members of Congress here) and federal district court in your area (find your district court here) before you send any such fax, e-mail or letter!

  2. Then, Report your action:

    Send Admin a private message telling us what Congressional District you referenced in your Quo Warranto request letter to the AG; that will help us track which congressional districts still need to find someone to send such requests to the AG. The bottom line: we need your feedback so we can know how well Operation Clean Sweep is working.

  3. Spread the word:

    1. Follow us on Twitter and refer others to do the same; and/or,

    2. Like us on Facebook; share Team Law’s comments on your wall and refer others to do the same; and/or,

    3. Refer people to this article on our forum; the way we like to do that is by simply directing people to and telling them to follow the “Call to Action” link in the headline of the article on that page;

    4. Copy this Sample e-mail message and send it as e-mail to everyone with whom you regularly communicate via e-mail.

This may be the most important thing that has happened in our lifetimes! Never before have the following key elements existed:

  1. A private people controlled social networking system that spans the globe in mere moments giving the people the power to unite on a cause virtually instantaneously;

  2. A man that is not a natural born Citizen was seated as the President of the United States in clear violation of the Constitutions mandate that Congress can never allow such a thing to happen; and,

  3. Respectively, every member of Congress is subject to removal from office via a Writ of Quo Warranto.

Of course, such a social network automatically becomes the place where people vent their frustration with just about everything you can think of; and, that means the opportunity to help people unite as they learn how to remedy such frustrations is available to us all—right now!

So, let’s get together and do it—follow the steps provided above. Act now, support this Call to Action.

If you have any questions or you want to know more about this effort you may:

  1. Join us for our daily Conference Call;

  2. Post them on our “Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 3” page;

  3. Click the following link to contact Team Law’s Trustee via private message and let him know of your interest; or,

  4. Use the information found on the “Contacting Team Law” page to call us.

Please note: throughout Team Law’s forum system, underlined blue text is linked to related content—for example:if you click on the following blue underlined text: Contact Team Law, a new browser tab will open related to that link.
Remember, to share this Call to Action with everyone you know; and, if for some reason you can\’t file an action against your congressmen, send donations to support our work to support those that can.

Team Law,

“In memory of our God, our faith, and freedom,
and of our spouses, our children, and our peace.”

PAN member’s showdown with Facebook

I’ve made enough anti-Facebook posts here, so people who like this blog know where I stand with them.  YouTube, in particular has similar biases; Christian and Conservative sites are deleted for “continuing copyright” or other Y.T. supposed rules violations.

This is just one response to a recent ban of Gerry Emery, a PAN member and Second Amendment rights ally, by Facebook; for running an article which contained an image stating that gun control helped make the Holocaust possible.

Too (omitted) bad for them!  As far as that goes, IBM’s technology helped make Hitler’s “final solution” possible.

Here is my version of “gun control”:

2nd A gun control-Ver 2

In any event, Kit Daniels, of Info  posted this in his defense:

Facebook Bans Gun Owners, Allows Kitten Torture Video

Uploading burning kitten video won’t get you banned, but talking about guns will










by Kit Daniels | | September 9, 2014

Facebook has no problem with a kitten torture video on its site, but when Facebook users talk about guns, the social media giant will censor them with zeal.

Recently a video was posted on Facebook showing two men lighting a helpless kitten in a bucket on fire, but after multiple users flagged the video, Facebook told them it “doesn’t violate our Community Standards.”

“I was going through Facebook and I saw this video,” user Kieran Dunwel told the Daily Mail. “I clicked on it, watched it and I was disgusted.”

“I reported it to Facebook, it took five or six hours for them to get back to me, and they said it was perfectly fine to have it on there.”

However, when users attempt to talk about guns or post pictures of firearms, Facebook hits them with “Community Standards” violations.

A few days ago, gun rights activist Gerry Emery was banned from Facebook after sharing an article explaining the ways in which Connecticut’s gun ban is worse than Hitler’s gun ban.

Facebook said Emery’s post, which also included an image stating that gun control helped make the Holocaust possible, “doesn’t follow Facebook Community Standards.”

“You’re temporarily blocked from posting,” Facebook told Emery. “This temporary block will last 30 days, and you won’t be able to post on Facebook until it’s finished.”

“You’ve repeatedly posted things that aren’t allowed on Facebook. Read the Facebook Community Standards to learn what kinds of posts aren’t allowed.”

Similarly, last year Facebook deactivated the page of a Pennsylvania gun store without warning after the store’s owner announced his intent to raffle off an AR-15.

“Our Ad Guidelines prohibit promotion of the sale of weapons and the Ad Guidelines apply to Pages with commercial content on them,” a Facebook spokesman told Vocativ. “Ads may not promote the sale or use of weapons, ammunition, or explosives.”

Facebook even expanded this policy back in March by preventing users under 18 from seeing the official pages of gun shops, effectively placing gun-related content in the same category as porn.

So basically, Facebook has no problem with users sharing a video of a kitten meowing in agony while in flames, but sharing an image of a Remington 700 mounted on a Harris bipod could get them banned.

This hypocrisy is a microcosm of gun control; despite what anti-gun advocates suggest, gun control is not meant to stop violence but rather it’s meant to restrict rights.

The Ripening Wanderer

The Clockwork Conservative

All wound up about politics, history, culture... lots of stuff.


at the Re-Birth of America!

ON MY WATCH - the writings of SamHenry

A Writer's Take on Global and National Issues with Background Information and Humor As Needed

Once Written

A Political Blog

Welcome to the Right Central

Under Construction.

purveyor of space kablooie stories.

Truth in Palmyra

By Wally Fry

Truth and Shadows

Following the white rabbit

Pacific Paratrooper

This site is Pacific War era information


The best in WWII aviation history

BUNKERVILLE | God, Guns and Guts Comrades!

God, Guns and Guts Comrades!

Aces Flying High

An Aussie's travels to air shows, aviation museums and related events around the world, with a bit of aerospace history along the way!

Eyes on Europe & Middle East

Des regards croisés sur l'Europe et le Moyen Orient

Doc Baize

Give me liberty or give me death!



Chastisement 2014

He is ready to separate the chaff from the wheat with his winnowing fork


The Take Down Of America

The Dangers of Allah

Confused about Islam, Muslims, Taqiyya, Kitman, The Islamic State, and Sharia? I've spent 14 years studying these confused beings.  They are not at all what they want us to believe, especially those who are ruled by al Qaeda , ISIS and the Muslim Brotherhood as well as those who commit overt and covert Jihad while practicing Sharia tortures upon women

Treason Among Us

A blog by Guido Volante Author of "Treason Among Us; Secrets of the S.E.C."

The Counter Jihad Report

News ~ Resources ~ Activism

Documenting the Islamization of America

Digestible Politics

Politics Made Easy!

A Conservative Christian Man

Stand for Your Belief or it is Not a Belief but an Excuse

sharia unveiled

illuminating minds

We Moved > Go To:


%d bloggers like this: