The D.C. Clothesline – Via a link from CLASHDAILY.com: This nation is closer to a Civil War than it has been since 1861.

This nation is closer to a Civil War than it has been since 1861.

Posted on March 29, 2013 by Jim Copenhaver

This nation is closer to a Civil War than it has been since 1861.

Scary thought, isn’t it? Especially to those who have seen war and know from  personal experience what it is like. If you are older than 35, would you ever have dreamed that one day, in our lifetimes, our country would be reduced to this? Sometimes it makes me want to cry for America. It makes me want to throw a fit and smash things, rage and scream like a wild man. I want to grab my weapons, march to Washington DC, stand up in front of Congress and the president and say, “Now Look, this is the way it is going to be or by God, I will start shooting!”

Kind of childish, isn’t it? I didn’t ask for the crap that is going on today. I don’t want it. I am near 60 years old. All I wanted was to live out the rest of my days in peace. I wanted to live out those days in the America that I knew and loved, where one was safe and didn’t have to worry about what the government was planning to do to you.

So much for that. Life has changed, as it is supposed to. But it is not a good change. It remains to be seen what good can come from this state of affairs. The one thing I do know is that it is up to us . . . each one of us. . . yes, that means you . . . to bring forth whatever good can be found.

I am very proud of the American people. Well, not the democrats and libtards obviously, but the conservatives and the rank and file. Despite this crisis, we have not panicked. We have not run around in circles screaming, “the sky is falling” and wringing our hands. We have not gone off like drunken fools to shoot up DC and impose our will. We have been patient and tried to give our elected officials time to do what is right. We have been preparing, but one can never be prepared enough. And time is getting short.

I earnestly hope and pray that our differences with our government can be settled through peaceful means. I know many are speaking of open rebellion against the government, but I know of no one who wants to overthrow the American system of government, only those people that currently occupy that government. If our differences can not be settled by peaceful means, then I am one who advocates rebellion. Again, time is getting short.

Last night was the first night of the Jewish holiday of Passover. For several years I was the guest of some Jewish friends on the first night of Passover.

If you are a Christian, I would highly recommend that you attend a Passover seder if you have the opportunity. There is a lot of symbolic meaning for Christians in the seder that goes back at least 2,000 years before the time of Jesus.

I bring this up because I am reminded of one particular Passover that took place 70 years ago, in 1943 in Warsaw, Poland. There is, quite possibly, no more unequal struggle throughout history.

It was on the first night of the Seder in 1943 that the Germans began the process of attempting to liquidate the Jewish community which lived in the Warsaw Ghetto. Like many other persecutors throughout history, the Nazis favored assaulting the Jewish people on their holidays. Yet, the Passover spirit proved to be stronger than the Nazis, for the Nazis were not given the easy victory that they had sought. According to the Hagadah, “It is not only one that has risen up against us to destroy us. Rather, in every generation, they rise against us to annihilate us. However, the Holy One, blessed be He, saves us from their hand.”

Thus, in 1943, the Nazis were the ones to “rise against us to annihilate us.”

However, the Jews of the Warsaw Ghetto, inspired by the Passover story, rose up against the Nazis and demonstrated that a struggling community of half-starved Jews had the power to hold out longer than countries like Poland and France against the Nazis oppressors. “Imbued with the call of Moses, they too declared, ‘Let my people go!’”

“They took up arms, though no one gave them arms. They fought, though no ally fought with them. On this night of Passover, the Jewish birthday of freedom from oppression and slavery, they restored self-defense and power to the Jewish people. Not many of them survived. Thus, on this night, when God watched over us millennia ago, we honor the memory of the young men and women of the Jewish Fighting Organization of the Warsaw Ghetto with a pledge that we will never forget the gift of revolt against tyranny that they bequeathed to us and to all humanity.”

If war against our government does come to us, then let us look to these brave warriors in the Warsaw Ghetto for hope, for inspiration, for courage. Let us follow their example so that all may see that we fought against oppression and slavery. When our story is told around the world, let it be shouted to the heavens that we fought for freedom.

A Few Notes from the Editor: Jim Copenhaver is a frequent contributor to The D.C. Clothesline. Our readers are always encouraged to share their own views and stories with us.  If you have something to contribute please send it to dean.garrison.99@gmail.com

I asked Jim and he allowed me to attach this brief blurb at the end of his article. For those of you who are not aware, we have a group of people preparing for the possibility of things happening as discussed in Jim’s article. There is no doubt that civil unrest is possible in America today and we are simply looking to build a network to be prepared for that possibility. We are not preparing for any offensive acts of aggression but we are getting like-minded people together in case we need to one day respond to these things being thrust upon us. We are not a militia, we are just a team of concerned Americans who want to be prepared if the worst should ever come. Currently we have 10 regional teams with about 18,000 total members and our project is only four days old. As membership grows we will break down into state and local areas. Here are the links should you decide to join us. -Dean Garrison

I clicked on one of these links. You have to be on facebook to see the respective pg.   “X”

• Patriot Team 0 Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Vermont

• Patriot Team 1-Delaware, New York, Pennsylvania

• Patriot Team 2-District of Columbia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia

• Patriot Team 3-Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Tennessee

• Patriot Team 4-Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio

• Patriot Team 5-Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wisconsin

• Patriot Team 6-Illinois, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska

• Patriot Team 7-Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas

• Patriot Team 8-Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming

• Patriot Team 9-Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington

Repost to WordPress, Blogger or Tumblr

A Witness to Nazi Tyranny – Kitty Werthmann – Related Item: Guns Across America Rally in Annapolis, MD

Interview date Feb, 2010. If Kitty is still living, she is eighty-four.

Kitty Werthmann Interview

Published on Jan 15, 2013

Kitty Werthmann recounts her childhood during the rise of Hitler.

RELATED:

Dan Bongino @ Guns Across America Rally in Annapolis, MD
Added by William Slavin on February 23, 2013

Trusting Your Own Government (or Not)

This item brought to my attention by Cry and Howl

January 31, 2013

Trusting Your Own Government (or Not)

By John Harvey

Earlier this month, Geraldo Rivera asked a caller: “How could you not trust your own government?”

Putting aside big and little episodes of untrustworthy government in the history of this country like the Trail of Tears, the internment of Americans of Japanese descent, Kent State, Waco, Fast and Furious, and the Benghazi Coverup, Rivera implies the burden of proof lies with the skeptical citizen when it comes to trust. But his question only diverts our attention. The issue isn’t the relative peace in the body politic at this instant. The question Geraldo asks really goes to the heart of the very nature of our government.

History is full of governments that ran sufficiently amok that they become a mortal danger to their own citizens. Such governments did not last. Indeed, the last century was so full of episodes of different governments murdering their own citizens by deliberate official policy that it spawned a new word: democide.

Many in the media and academia who largely reject American Exceptionalism want us to believe instead that our government is exceptional in light of the history of governments. In how easily they dismiss the Second Amendment as being obsolete, they are telling us that there are no circumstances whatsoever in which some future American government would ever turn feral. They are willing to stake the lives of their children and grandchildren on that assertion.

Certainly people want a trustworthy and competent government. But it concerns me that more than one member of the president’s inner circle has publicly praised China’s Mao, a man responsible for the brutal deaths of over 40 million Chinese citizens. I am shocked that a close advisor to the president has favorably quoted Mao’s warning that [political] power comes from the barrel of a gun. It is chilling to see a Mao-themed ornament on a White House Christmas tree, or the number of supporters of this administration who also voice approval of the murderous Che Guevara. It is incongruous that a man who was a leader of a group of radical socialists who contemplated murdering 25 million Americans should they reject postrevolutionary ideological reeducation is now a frequent visitor to the White House.

Additionally, the Department of Homeland Security is busy stockpiling two billion rounds of hollow point pistol ammunition. The very government that Geraldo implies we must trust is spending hundreds of millions of dollars on a contingency plan that cannot be explained by any current trends. The shocking implied question is not only who does DHS intent to shoot, but under what circumstances? Even if this plan devoted 100 rounds to each anticipated target, two billion rounds implies violent action by government against 20 million of its 310 million citizens. Is this the same 20 or so million the Weather Underground leader who now visits the White House anticipated needing to eliminate?

How should we rationally evaluate these facts? As disconnected random coincidences or as a glimpse of the plans of those in power and those who cheer them on? As long as the relationship between public servants and the public they serve is healthy, then we all can enjoy the blessings of liberty, which was the core reason the federal government was formed over 200 years ago.

But what happens when the public servant starts to think he is the public master instead?

Nobody can predict how a future government might endanger our own descendants by running amok. For example, what social, political, or legal forces exist today that would stop another Trail of Tears that were not sufficient to stop it the first time? Certainly firearms aren’t the answer to every outrage, or even most. Even though we are all civilized and strive to be peaceful and polite to everyone, we cannot allow the precious right to keep and bear arms to be crippled with my generation, any more than we could allow the right of free speech to be crippled. Our future grandchildren might curse us for neglecting to preserve the very tools they might need most during some urgent crisis in their lives, even though no learned member of the news media could possibly envision such a thing at this moment.

The philosopher Karl Popper offers us some guidance. In Volume 2 of his The Open Society and Its Enemies, he wrote:

“…the use of violence is justified only under a tyranny which makes reforms without violence impossible, and it should have only one aim, that is, to bring about a state of affairs which make reforms without violence possible.”

Can a government whose bureaucracy carefully hoards 2 billion rounds of ammunition in a country of some 310 million citizens be trusted to plan to implement “reforms” without violence?  Only oppressive socialist governments attempt such agendas. It is more commonly called “reeducation.” How does Geraldo’s question relate to such a plan, indeed to a government potentially with this manner of plan? Because it is not the duty of any democratic government to reform citizens, is the rational “contingency” being planned for that too many citizens will refuse to comply with government edicts that are yet to be made public?

Americans reached this point at one time in the history of the land they settled when the edicts of the government of England became too injurious and offensive at too many levels. Are we, who always put on our seat belts lest we have a crash, and avoid trans-fats lest we get clogged arteries, who always brush and floss, and who always do so many other things to avoid all the little and rare risks of life, are we not going to think for one moment that the government we depend upon to do its job competently, will never acquire a different attitude about what its job is and who is in charge? That government could never have an authoritarian seizure, or tell us one thing when its leaders intend on something entirely different, or even decide that it had the power to sterilize or assassinate its own citizens, or just take their children away for flimsy reasons or think it actually needed to use some of those rounds it is stockpiling — that this could never, ever happen in all history to come?

I find it ironic that a British subject, in the form of a smug CNN anchor, is artfully scolding and lecturing American guests on his show about their support for the right to keep and bear arms. I recall a time when the finest award-winning journalists of their time, like the New York Time’s own Walter Duranty, could not bring themselves to report that Stalin was deliberately starving millions of Ukrainian farmers to death as an act of government policy. Did Duranty and the Times choose to dissemble because they believed they were serving a higher cause at the time?  Do members of the media lie about firearms because they are serving a higher cause today? And when some future government they support runs wild and thousands (or millions) die, how will the media report it? The same way they glowingly talk about the exploits of Che Guevara or Bill Ayers, whom they tell us is just a neighbor of the current president?

In related news, the UK Telegraph carried a story on January 25, 2013 concenring Google Earth satellite photos of North Korea’s vast system of political prison camps and prison cities. The paper reports, “Inmates — who can be imprisoned for life, along with three generations of their families, for anything deemed to be critical of the regime — are forced to survive by eating rats and picking corn kernels out of animal waste…”

And Israel National News reports that a new exhibit opened at Yad Vashem to mark 2013 Holocaust Memorial Day: “…the exhibit represents only an example of more than 71,000 items donated by thousands of people over the last two years as a way of perpetuating the memory of relatives who perished during the Holocaust….”

Photo credit: Creative Commons

Teacher desecrates flag; also – Why the Founding Fathers Matter

Posted by a PAN member on 1-10-13

Teacher throws flag on floor and stomps it

• Added by Last Crusader

PAN Member’s comment:

Comment by Mike Rios on January 13, 2013 at 6:34pm

This teacher is undoubtedly a product of the same leftist philosophy that Obama learned and taught. This incident brings to mind the indoctrination that the South Vietnamese people received once the Communists over took the land. They would take the flags and other symbols of the Republic of South Vietnam and throw them down and stomp them. They would then teach the children to do the same and then the children would challenge the parents to desecrate the symbols of their nation. If the parents refused the children told the Angkor guards and their parents were usually executed or tortured or both.

America, let me introduce you to the political ideals of Barak Hussein Obama.

See:
http://conservativebyte.com/2013/01/south-carolina-teacher-on-leave-for-stomping-on-american-flag-in-front-of-class/

Courtesy of swissdefenceleague, who posted this from:

Green Mountain Scribes

Analysis of national and state news, politics, opinion, history

Why the Founding Fathers Matter

Posted on December 27, 2012 by Alan Sexton

By Tom DeWeese, President of the American Policy Center

It has become typical in school text books, in public discussions, and in the smug wisdom of Progressives, to diminish the words and actions of those who led the founding of the United States. However, now that the nation has gone through what Al Gore called a “wrenching transformation” away from limited government, free enterprise, and individual liberty (all major ingredients to making the US the freest and most prosperous nation in history) it’s time to listen again to their wisdom.

Thomas Jefferson warned us to …

Avoid Sustainable Development:  “When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, we shall become as corrupt as Europe.”

Avoid the Welfare State:  “The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.” “I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.”

Avoid Massive Government Debt:  “It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the world.”

Avoid Government Over-regulation:  “My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government.”

Avoid Control of Individual Gun Ownership:  “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” “The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.”

Avoid Compulsive Taxation of Income:  “To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.”

Avoid the Federal Reserve:  “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property – until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”

Keep the Founding Documents Intact:  “May (the Declaration of Independence) be to the world, what I believe it will be, to some parts sooner, to others later, but finally to all, the signal to assume the blessings and security of self-government.” His last written words June 24, 1826

The Founding Fathers are irrelevant? Every one of these issues is in the forefront of today’s political debates. Our Founders understood government and its dangers to our liberty. They feared it above all other threats and tried to create a system of self government through which we could protect ourselves from its tyranny. When their warnings are ignored we get Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and a government of lies, oppression and national bankruptcy.

http://greenmountainscribes.wordpress.com/2012/12/27/why-the-founding-fathers-matter/

2nd Amendment: Overthrowing a Tyrannical Government

 Posted on January 5, 2013 byConservative Byte

Given all the gun talk lately, Mark Levin opened his show tonight clarifying the purpose of the 2nd amendment saying that it wasn’t for target shooting or hunting or anything else in that realm. He said that whether you like it or not or whether you agree with it or not, the reason why 2nd amendment exists is to arm the population in order to overthrow a tyrannical government. That’s it.

Continue Reading on www.therightscoop.com …

Read more: http://conservativebyte.com/2013/01/2nd-amendment-overthrowing-a-tyrannical-government/#ixzz2HI3f0EQb

 

The Already Horrible Just Got WORSE – Patriot Action Network

 

-General Carter Ham at a Pentagon Briefing.

 

 

Just When You Thought Obama, Panetta and Hillary could not possibly get any worse…they DO…

 

October 18th, 2012 Sec. of Defense, Leon Panetta said-

Mr. Panetta said, “Today I am very pleased to announce that President Obama will nominate General David Rodriguez to succeed General Carter Ham as commander of U.S. Africa Command.” This came as a surprise to many, since General Ham had only been in the position for a year and a half. The General is a very well regarded officer who made AFRICOM into a true Combatant Command after the ineffective leadership of his predecessor, General William E. “Kip” Ward. Later, word circulated informally that General Ham was scheduled to rotate out in March 2013 anyway, but according to Joint doctrine, “the tour length for combatant commanders and Defense agency directors is three years.” Some assumed that he was leaving for unspecified personal reasons.

Source-

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/robbins-report/2012/oct/28/gene…

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Now THAT is the Obama Official on-the-record stated view.

 

But as we all have come to KNOW, Obama’s “Official Stated View” is what honest folk call a LIE.

 

So what is the straight-skinny on this?

What REALLY happened?

 

This-

 

The information I heard today was that General Ham as head of Africom received the same e-mails the White House received requesting help/support as the attack was taking place. General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had a unit ready.

General Ham then received the order to stand down. His response was to screw it, he was going to help anyhow. Within 30 seconds to a minute after making the move to respond, his second in command apprehended General Ham and told him that he was now relieved of his command.

The story continues that now General Rodiguez would take General Ham’s place as the head of Africom.

Source-

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/robbins-report/2012/oct/28/gene…

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

IF you’ve been following this sorry saga of Islamic Jihad against America then you already KNOW that our Commander-In-Chief is on the side of America’s ENEMIES…

 

What you may not know is “For HOW long had Obama side with our Muslim and Marxist Enemies?”

 

THIS long-

FROM WND’S JERUSALEM BUREAUWorldNetDaily Exclusive

Hamas ‘happy’ with Obama’s $900 million pledge

Funds earmarked for U.N. agency that openly employs terrorists

Published: 02/24/2009

 

TEL AVIV, Israel – Hamas is “very happy” with a pledge this week from the Obama administration to provide $900 million in aid for rebuilding the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip, a spokesman from the Islamist organization told WND.

“We are very happy with this decision,” said Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum, speaking by cell phone from Gaza. “In the first place, this money will go toward reconstructing efforts.”

Fawzi Barhoum

 

Source-

http://www.wnd.com/2009/02/89949/

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Did you catch the date of that article?

This was done within 3-4 weeks of Obama’s Inauguration!

Meaning Obama, Panetta and Hillary had planned this for a while!

 

Since at least February 24th, 2009 Obama has openly sided with America’s ENEMIES!

 

$900,000,000 TO HAMAS/The Palestinian Authority!!!

A Terrorist Group!!

 

 

Come November 6th…

 

NObama in NOvember!

 

BE CONSERVATIVE.

WIN!

 

 

 

-Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer- P.A.N. Admin II.

“Disobedience to tyrants is Obedience to God.” -Benjamin Franklin.

 

Patriot Action Network – Executive Orders & the Death of a Republic

The unconstitutional acts by the Executive branch, with Congress sitting mute in response, -making them complicit and as guilty-, are clearly stated here. Enlarged font my emphasis  “X”

• Posted by Jim Delaney on October 20, 2012 at 11:30am
• Send MessageView Blog

Retroactive from 1862, not until 1907 were Executive Orders (EO’s) published in the Federal Register. And today, over 15,000 EO’s have been issued and published.

But, just what are they, and, more importantly, are they constitutional?

The short of it is that EO’s, aka signing statements, presidential determinations, presidential orders, have inexorably led to legally binding presidential directives substantially affecting not only executive administrative matters, but both national and foreign policy matters quite outside the enumerated constitutional powers of the Executive Branch.

With that in mind, the greatest fear of the founders was the establishment of a powerful central government and a strong political leader at the center of that government. They were determined to prevent the rise of monarchs, potentates or czars. Their plan was for a voluntary association of sovereign States in which power emanated from the States and the People, not from an overweaning central authority. For the framers and ratifiers, Congress, properly checked by both the Judiciary and the Executive, was intended to be THE focus of federal power and THE source of federal law.

 Art I, Sec 1 of the US Constitution concisely and unambiguously provides that “all legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress…” In sharp contrast, Art II specifically outlines Executive powers and duties, none of which include legislating in any form. And to checkmate an overreaching Chief Executive, Art II also provides for the impeachment and removal of not only the Chief Executive, but of any and all officers comprising the Executive Branch.

Originally intended to soley direct executive departments how to faithfully implement laws legislated by Congress, since the early 20^th century EO’s have morphed into far-reaching imperial edicts which have little real hope of being invalidated by an unaccountable Supreme Court or overridden by a permissive Congress. In fact, in all our history only two EO’s have been successfully invalidated/overriden: Truman’s 1952 order to place all steel mills under federal control was invalidated by the Supreme Court, and a Clinton EO in 1995 which attempted to prevent the federal government from contracting with organizations that had strike-breakers on the payroll was overturned by Congress. Thus, despite their being in flagrant violation of the Constitution, while EO’s can be voided, to do so is, indeed, acutely challenging and, therefore, rarely accomplished.

Worth noting are those less appealing and unsavory EO’s such as Franklin Roosevelt’s order to remove all Japanese & German Americans from military zones, and to relocate Japanese Americans to internment camps proceeded unchallenged by either Congress or the Supreme Court.

 So, how can Congress, the People’s House, void an EO, assuming Congress were so inclined?

First, Congress must have the political will, rectitude and the numbers to effectively countermand EO’s. That said, as it plays out now if Congress disapproves an EO, it can withhold funds. But, to do so requires enactment of a law which must pass muster both in the House and the Senate. The rub: if the law intended to countermand an EO is vetoed by the President, to override that veto requires a 2/3 vote, a super majority, in both chambers of Congress, clearly a politically daunting task indeed. Of course, there is the laborious process of impeachment and removal of the offending President to remedy the executive overreach. But, again, removal would require a 2/3 majority in the Senate, a very unlikely scenario.

 The alternative means of voiding an EO is if a suit is brought against the President before the Supreme Court and the court invalidates the EO, again a highly unlikely scenario. As we all know, the Supreme Court, which has proven to be far less than faithful to the meaning and intent of the Constitution, is often on the wrong side of constitutional questions. Seemingly guided by Chief Justice Hughes’s arrogant and insidious assertion in 1941 that “we are under a Constitution, but the Constitution is what the judges say it is”,the court’s unelected judicial oligarchs–and, yes, judicial legislators–have, over the years, proven to be unreliable defenders of the Constitution.

It should be remembered that Roger Sherman, a principal among the framers, held that the president should not have legislative authority; that his job was to execute the laws and nothing more: “The Executive Branch is nothing more than an institution for carrying the will of the legislature into effect”.

 Similarly, another principal framer, James Wilson, asserted that “the only powers strictly executive were those of executing laws, appointing officers, not appertaining to, and appointed by, the legislature.”

And upon the advice of fellow framer Charles Pinckney, none other than James Madison asserted that the president should have “power to carry into effect the national laws, to appoint to offices in cases not otherwise provided for, and to execute such other powers—not legislative or judiciary–in nature.”

 In effect, the framers insisted that the Chief Executive could not propose or make legislation under any guise, but, with respect to legislation, was absolutely restricted to executing those laws passed by Congress. Crystal clear, but grossly ignored by today’s power elite.

With the “help”of a habitually unfaithful Supreme Court, a corrupted Congress, and a complacent citizenry, is it any wonder we’ve strayed so far afield from the Constitution?

 So, in the absence of a President who might happen to be personally inclined to faithfully adhere to the Constitution, we have little defense against a tyrannical Chief Executive. Thus, if the Supreme Court and Congress are unwilling to restore constitutional order by affirmatively re-establishing the doctrine of separation of powers at the federal level, then, ultimately, and in accordance with the 10^thAmendment, it falls to the States and/or the People to take appropriate action to remedy the breach. As James Madison asserted, “…the people have an indubitable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to reform or change their government whenever it be found adverse or inadequate to the purpose of its institution.”

In truth, our now tattered and barely recognizable republic which was originally held securely in place by a carefully crafted system of checks and balances and separation of powers is no more. To believe otherwise is wishftyranny,ul thinking, or, worse, delusional. Since TR, with his 1006 unchallenged EO’s, Woodrow Wilson’s 3,723 EO’s and Obama’s in excess of 130 frighteningly Orwellian EO’s, the imperial presidency has clearly taken on a life of its own, unchecked and tyrannical, effectively scuttling any similarity to genuine republicanism. In reality, all that holds this sham of a republic in place is the President’s appearance of faithfulness to the constitution and a pervading hope that the President, whomever he or she might be, will kindly opt not to overstep his or her constitutional authority. But, if history is any authoritative guide, such self-inflicted delusion and misplaced confidence can only lead to national disaster.

Going forward, patriots everywhere had best pull out all stops to usher in a Constitution-first conservative takeover in DC. But, that’s only half the battle. Once elected, we must hold their corruptible feet to the fire to ensure a full restoration of our now mortally wounded constitutional republic, failing which only the dissolution of these united States by whatever means, violent or peaceful, is most certainly inevitable.

To be clear, EO’s aren’t a Progressive or Republican problem. EO’s are an equal opportunity contagion. Both parties, all modern presidents, Congress, the Supreme Court, and, yes, We the People are culpable. If we deserve better, we will beget better.

PAN Admin – The Truth About The Counting of The Votes

Admin II

Posted by Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer Admin II

Spain is NOT Counting U.S. Election Votes…

…NEVER was, NEVER has.

There has been for 5-7 months or longer speculation that a George Soros owned company in Spain was going to count the votes of the 2012 Election.

Other sites have stated this as fact.

Those sites have stated it as “fact” for so long and so often that many, too many, are believing it without really checking it out from reliable and verifiable sources.

Those sites have actually railed and raged against this “fact”, that Spain (or some “outside” George Soros owned source) was going to count OUR Votes.

It simply is NOT true. NEVER was.

This is from “The Blaze”-

Now before you batten down the hatches and start freaking out, let’s dig a little deeper. Snopes and conservative authoress Michelle Malkin make quick work of the rumor and thoroughly debunks this mess. From Snopes:

The Obama administration could not possibly have “sold the processing rights of our votes in the general election” to Scytl, as the federal government does not run elections: individual states do. It’s up to each state to determine on its own how to conduct its elections and what voting systems to use.

Moreover, it’s highly unlikely any states will be choosing to use systems like Scytl’s to implement online voting on anything more than a very limited basis in the 2012 general election. Scytl’s current list of customers includes only four U.S. states plus the District of Columbia, all of whom have so far limited their use of Scytl systems to providing a means for overseas (i.e., military and absentee) voters to cast their ballots remotely… an article from Discovery News which notes that even on the rare occasion when online voting was used, it failed to work in some cases and those systems will not be revisited in 2012.

Source:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/fact-check-does-soros-own-an-overse…

==================================

Conservative writer, Michele Malkin, responds when asked whether a “foreign entity” will count U.S. votes says “It is …-

FICTION: According to alarmists, Scytl’s acquisition of SOE amounts to a complete takeover of America’s election system. No, not really. While SOE boasts of a presence “with 900 jurisdictions as customers in 26 states,” there is no single contract that the federal government has entered into, or could, with Scytl to count the 2012 presidential election votes. Much of the work Scytl/SOE analysts do is number-crunching and graphics software work after lcal and state officials have done the vote-counting.

Source-

http://www.humanevents.com/2012/05/09/scytl-voter-fraud-facts-and-f…

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The above is not just from Michele Malkin but from “Human Events”, one of the oldest, absolutely most reliable, verifiable Conservative News sources period. Ronald Reagan read and trusted “Human Events”, as have I for over 22 years.

Next we have an article from “American Patriot Alliance”, a group founded and directed by a Conservative, and a Marine, Robert P. Dean, USMC.

So here are the FACTS…

1) Scytl IS IN FACT a company owned in Spain. In January 2012, Scytl acquired Florida-based SOE Software. SOE writes “election management” programs that assist officials with everything from “Internet voting to election night reporting and online poll worker training.” HOWEVER, it does NOT count each and every American vote. Scytl provides the software with which MILITARY MEMBERS, OVERSEAS U.S. CITIZENS and ABSENTEE VOTERS can CHOICE to vote through ELECTRONIC BALLOT.

Scytl specializes in “electoral security technology” and electronic voting applications. Its cryptographic research initially was funded by the Spanish government’s Ministry of Science and Technology and later was spun off as a private-sector e-voting venture.

They work in conjunction with not only the Defense Department, but Overseas Vote Foundation as well to ensure the fastest, most secure means for casting a ballot in a federal election. Is it 100% SECURE. NO. NOTHING over the internet is. HOWEVER, it provides a solution for U.S. citizens to DOWNLOAD and PRINT their ballot and MAIL it back to their respective voting jurisdictions.

2) Scytl is NOT owned by GEORGE SOROS, nor do ANY of its Board of Directors have ANY identifiable or confirmed connection to Soros or his foundations! Scytl lists the company’s investors as Nauta Capital, Balderton Capital and Spinnaker SCR.

3) Currently only EIGHT STATES (along with those working with DOD, have agreements with Scytl to use their software/services, those being: West Virginia, New York, Alabama, Virginia, Mississippi, Arkansas and Florida, as well as the District of Columbia.

Source-

http://wvtea.org/forum/topics/no-spain-is-not-counting-presidential…

————————————————————————————-

Robert Dean then goes on and breaks down the 8 states, The D.C. area and the DOD and 100% disprove any “George-Soros-Spain-Alex-Jones-Global-Conspiracy”, see-

http://wvtea.org/forum/topics/no-spain-is-not-counting-presidential…

In this article from a Tech Expert, one who works full-time in the field, and does research and development, reports that voting online is YEARS away, and probably always will be-

http://techpinions.com/internet-voting-is-years-away-and-maybe-alwa…

Lastly, THIS article shows that Soros does NOT own SCYTL-

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1029160/000101143812000287/f…

I hope this lays to rest the unfounded MYTH that Soros/Spain/SCYTL will count OUR U.S. votes.

It is NOT true.

It NEVER was true.

BE CONSERVATIVE.

WIN!

Muslim Fury: ‘Mohammed movie not the problem, but Islam’

Here’s your “peaceful” Islamists…

Courtesy of  Boudica BPI Weblog

Muslim Fury: ‘Mohammed movie not the problem, but Islam’.

No matter how much you may dislike Romney…

Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer of the Patriot Action Network posted this on 8-10 as “Do We REALLY Want Four More Years of THIS?!”

Let’s Take A Closer Look At Obama……….

☹ April 2008 – Obama speaks disrespectfully of Christians, saying
they “cling to guns and religion” and have an “antipathy to people
who aren’t like them.”

☹ January 2009 – President Obama’s nominee for deputy secretary
of state asserts that American taxpayers are required to pay for
abortions and that limits on abortion funding are unconstitutional.

☹ January 2009 – Obama lifts restrictions on U.S. government funding
for groups that provide abortion services or counseling abroad, forcing
taxpayers to fund pro-abortion groups that either promote or perform
abortions in other nations.

☹ February 2009 – Obama announces plans to revoke conscience
protection for health workers who refuse to participate in medical
activities that go against their beliefs, and fully implements the
plan in February 2011.

☹ March 2009 – The Obama administration shut out pro-life
groups from attending a White House-sponsored health care summit.

☹ March 2009 – Obama orders taxpayer funding of embryonic stem cell research.

☹ March 2009 – Obama gave $50 million for the UNFPA,
the UN population agency that promotes abortion and works closely
with Chinese population control officials who use forced abortions
and involuntary sterilizations.

☹ April 2009 – When speaking at Georgetown University, Obama orders
that a monogram symbolizing Jesus’ name be covered when he is making
his speech.

☹ May 2009 – Obama declines to host services for the National Prayer Day
(a day established by federal law) at the White House.

☹ May 2009 – The White House budget eliminates all funding
for abstinence-only education and replaces it with “comprehensive”
sexual education, repeatedly proven to increase teen pregnancies
and abortions. 31 He continues the deletion in subsequent budgets.

☹ May 2009 – Obama officials assemble a terrorism dictionary
calling pro-life advocates violent and charging that they use
racism in their “criminal” activities.

☹ July 2009 – The Obama administration illegally extends federal
benefits to same-sex partners of Foreign Service and Executive
Branch employees, in direction violation of the federal Defense
of Marriage Act.

☹ September 16, 2009 – The Obama administration appoints as EEOC
Commissioner Chai Feldblum, who asserts that society should “not tolerate”
any “private beliefs,” including religious beliefs, if they may negatively
affect homosexual “equality.”

☹ July 2010 – The Obama administration uses federal funds in
violation of federal law to get Kenya to change its constitution
to include abortion.

☹ August 2010 – The Obama administration Cuts funding for
176 abstinence education programs.

☹ September 2010 – The Obama administration tells researchers to ignore a
judge’s decision striking down federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.

☹ October 19, 2010 – Obama begins deliberately omitting the phrase
about “the Creator” when quoting the Declaration of Independence
– an omission he has made on no less than seven occasions.

☹ November 2010 – Obama misquotes the National Motto, saying it
is “E pluribus unum” rather than “In God We Trust” as established by
federal law.

☹ January 2011 – After a federal law was passed to transfer a WWI Memorial
in the Mojave Desert to private ownership, the U. S. Supreme Court ruled
that the cross in the memorial could continue to stand, but the Obama
administration refused to allow the land to be transferred as required by law,
and refused to allow the cross to be re-erected as ordered by the Court.

☹ February 2011 – Although he filled posts in the State Department,
for more than two years Obama did not fill the post of religious freedom
ambassador, an official that works against religious persecution across
the world; he filled it only after heavy pressure from the public and from
Congress.

☹ February 2011 – Obama directs the Justice Department to stop
defending the federal Defense of Marriage Act.

☹ March 2011 – The Obama administration refuses to investigate
videos showing Planned Parenthood helping alleged sex traffickers
get abortions for victimized underage girls.

☹ April 2011 – For the first time in American history, Obama urges
passage of a non-discrimination law that does not contain hiring
protections for religious groups, forcing religious organizations to
hire according to federal mandates without regard to the dictates
of their own faith, thus eliminating conscience protection in hiring.

☹ June 2011 – The Department of Veterans Affairs forbids references
to God and Jesus during burial ceremonies at Houston National Cemetery.

☹ July 2011 – Obama allows homosexuals to serve openly in the military,
reversing a policy originally instituted by George Washington in March 1778.

☹ August 2011 – The Air Force stops teaching the Just War theory to officers
in California because the course is taught by chaplains and is based on a
philosophy introduced by St. Augustine in the third century AD – a theory
long taught by civilized nations across the world (except America).

☹ August 2011 – The Obama administration releases its new health
care rules that override religious conscience protections for medical
workers in the areas of abortion and contraception.

☹ September 2011 – Air Force Chief of Staff prohibits commanders
from notifying airmen of programs and services available to them from chaplains.

☹ September 2011 – The Army issues guidelines for Walter Reed Medical
Center stipulating that “No religious items (i.e. Bibles, reading materials
and/or facts) are allowed to be given away or used during a visit.”

☹ September 2011 – The Pentagon directs that military chaplains may
perform same-sex marriages at military facilities in violation of the federal
Defense of Marriage Act.

☹ October 2011 – The Obama administration eliminates federal grants
to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops for their extensive programs
that aid victims of human trafficking because the Catholic Church is anti-abortion.

☹ November 2011 – The Air Force Academy rescinds support for Operation
Christmas Child, a program to send holiday gifts to impoverished children
across the world, because the program is run by a Christian charity.

☹ November 2011 – The Air Force Academy pays $80,000 to add a
Stonehenge-like worship center for pagans, druids, witches and Wiccans.

☹ November 2011 – Obama opposes inclusion of President
Franklin Roosevelt’s famous D-Day Prayer in the WWII Memorial.

☹ November 2011 – Unlike previous presidents, Obama studiously avoids any religious references
in his Thanksgiving speech.

☹ January 2012 – The Obama administration argues that the First Amendment provides no protection for churches and synagogues in hiring their pastors and rabbis.

☹ February 2012 – The Obama administration forgives student
loans in exchange for public service, but announces it will no
longer forgive student loans if the public service is related to religion.

☹ February 2012 – The U. S. Military Academy at West Point disinvites
three star Army general and decorated war hero Lieutenant General
William G. (“Jerry”) Boykin (retired) from speaking at an event because
he is an outspoken Christian.

☹ February 2012 – The Air Force removes “God” from the patch of
Rapid Capabilities Office (the word on the patch was in Latin: Dei).

☹ February 2012 – The Army orders Catholic chaplains not to read
a letter to parishioners that their archbishop asked them to read.

From an email.

BE CONSERVATIVE.

WIN!

-Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer- P.A.N. Admin II.

“Disobedience to tyrants is Obedience to God.” -Benjamin Franklin.