Saturday, 29 September 2012 00:00 JB Williams
Sadly, too many Americans don’t know what communism is, or they foolishly think that it died with the fall of the Soviet Union. Nothing could be further from the truth. Communism is alive and well, but it isn’t just in Russia or China anymore.
The 2012 election is not a referendum on Mitt Romney or Barack Obama. It is a referendum on American society. It is a contest between two opposite American Dreams and the outcome will tell us nothing about Romney and Obama, but everything about the American people.
It is a test of ALL Americans, those who vote and those who don’t bother, and those who think they can afford to play 3rd party games on the sidelines, even in the most important election in U.S. history.
Unfortunately, before we can answer the subject question, I will have to teach the definition of communism first. Baby-boomers were never taught not to destroy their own country by overloading productive members of society with the high cost of free-stuff for folks like the common Obama supporter. But they won’t be able to claim ignorance after reading this column.
“A theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in common, actual ownership being ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state; A system of social organization in which all economic and social activity is controlled by a totalitarian state – dominated by a single and self-perpetuating political party.” – That’s the definition of communism according to Dictionary.com
Let’s break that down a moment…
a system of social organization – as-in, social engineering via community organizing for benefit of social justice.
based on the holding of all property in common – as-in, you didn’t build that business, farm that land, earn that paycheck or save that money, etc. – nationalizing all primary productive industries.
actual ownership being ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state – as-in, our new 60% stake in General Motors, AGI, numerous banks, gas, oil, medical and insurance companies via so-called federal bailouts.
in which all economic and social activity is controlled by a totalitarian state – as-in, Obama and his many unelected and unaccountable Czars currently dictating business practices, profit margins and pay scales.
dominated by a single and self-perpetuating political party – as-in, today’s Democrat Party, operating a dictatorship, bypassing the other two branches of “equal government” through the longest list of “executive orders” in U.S. history, self-perpetuated by the flow of massive funds from Democrat Party to labor unions to government employees, entertainers, sports figures, journalists and welfare recipients – back to labor unions who in turn fund the Democrat Party, or support is directly in the election booth. Government employees topping the list of Obama campaign donors, is as self-perpetuating as it can get.
So, now that I have covered the definition of communism for baby-boomers who thought Senator McCarthy was crazy, and tied communism directly to Democrat and Obama & Co., America’s first Communist Administration, let’s answer my original question.
When did communism replace freedom and liberty as the new American Dream?
The answer is – it was a slow incremental process — that some today call progress and it started a very long time ago, while nobody was paying any attention.
Lawyers and judges started trying to dismantle the U.S. Constitution before the ink was dry. So, freedom and liberty have been under assault from the very beginning in America, as a subtle corps of sappers and miners constantly worked underground to undermine our Constitution from a co-ordinate of a general and special government to a general supreme one alone. – Not my words, Thomas Jefferson’s.
Politically, everything really started heading to hell in a hand basket under Taft and Wilson. 1913 was a really bad year… a hundred years ago by the next presidential inauguration, via unconstitutional amendments initiated by Republicans under Taft and ratified by Democrats under Wilson.
If you understand the modern face and democratic strategies of communism, then you can begin to fit the pieces of the puzzle together.
- State representation ended in 1913 with the 17th Amendment, effectively ending states’ rights
- Decentralized power ended in 1913 with the 16th Amendment, directly funding central power
- Claims that the States lost their 10th Amendment rights in the Civil War began
- Revision of history was underway in academia, the media and the entertainment industry
- Intellectuals began rewriting new definitions of ancient terminology
- The promotion of free-stuff eclipsed the promotion of freedom
- One Nation Under God was replaced with celebrating secularism and diversity
- Real justice was replaced with social justice, defined and measured by men
- Unalienable rights from our Creator were replaced with limited man-made rights
You get the point…
What we see happening today didn’t begin with the election of America’s first fraudulent Muslim Marxist in 2008. The truth is, global leftists didn’t believe they could leap to this final stage until 2016 and neither did anyone else. However, the American press and courts made it possible for them to push up their closing strategy by two full election cycles, using the race card to trick Americans into electing someone they knew absolutely nothing about and still know very little about four years later.
Senator McCarthy was right. There was a very strong communist movement operating out of California via the Communist Party USA, now headquartered in New York. There is a like-minded competitor organization, the Socialist Party USA (aka Democratic Socialists of America) also operating out of New York. The two share a common dream for America and that dream is entirely un-American.
These organizations knew that they had to change strategies to advance communism in the U.S.A. – so they changed strategies. Communist Party USA member and Michigan congressman John Conyers formed the Congressional Black Caucus, used to exploit the black population via racial divisions, for the sole purpose of advancing the Communist Party agenda.
The Socialist Party USA (DSAUSA) formed the Congressional Progressive Caucus via Socialist Party USA member Bernie Sanders, congressman from Vermont. Their strategy was to work like parasites from inside the American two-party system, rather than in direct competition with it. The goal was to seize control of one or both parties from inside. They now control the DNC and have moles inside the RNC as well.
For years, both parties tried to advance political candidates under their own banners, failing miserably in every effort. Until recent years, Americans wouldn’t knowingly vote for communists or socialists and third parties have never been able to compete with the two primary parties on the national stage.
Still, these organizations tried yet again under The New Party banner in the 90s, associated with the now infamous ACORN. The New Party is the banner under which Barack Hussein Obama first sought political office in Illinois.
Minutes of a meeting on January 11, 1996, of the New Party’s Chicago chapter read as follows: “Barack Obama, candidate for State Senate in the 13th Legislative District, gave a statement to the membership and answered questions. He signed the New Party “Candidate Contract” and requested an endorsement from the New Party. He also joined the New Party.” – Another part of Obama communist history that Obama and his media minions want to keep quiet.
Failing on the 1996 New Party ticket in Illinois, Barack Hussein Obama later switched to the Democratic Party for his second Illinois Senate campaign in 2004 and he was elected to the Illinois Senate with the endorsement of his New Party (aka communist) friends.
He was immediately rushed to the top of the Democrat Party messiah list and introduced to the nation and the world as the new future of the Democrat Party during the John Kerry DNC Convention in 2004, stealing the stage from Kerry and becoming the man who would defeat Hillary Clinton and the famous Clinton War Machine, for the 2008 DNC Presidential nod.
Nobody knew anything about Obama then. Millions of Americans bought into his promises of “hope and change” without ever stopping to ask who this person was, where he came from, how he arose from total obscurity to international fame overnight with absolutely zero accomplishments on his résumé. Nobody even bothered to ask what kinds of “change” he had in store for America. It was the most amazing political scam I had ever witnessed, and I have witnessed many political scams, here and abroad.
The American people were dead asleep at the switch. All they had to know was what the leftist press told them — that if they didn’t vote for this person, Barack Hussein Obama, a chance to “make history,” they were “racists.” So, history was indeed made. The first communist president was elected to the people’s White House, by massive hook and crook.
Ask any American if they want to join you for a movie and they will immediately ask which movie? Ask them if they want to join you for dinner and they will ask where you plan to eat? Ask them if they are a sports fan and they will tell you that it depends upon which sport you are referring to… Ask them for a loan and they will ask how much, and when you can pay it back. Americans are not stupid, but they are often deaf, dumb and blind. They see, hear and think, only what they want to…
But when the American people heard “change” from a person they knew nothing about, and had no reason at all to place their “hope” in, they didn’t ask any questions at all. How strange… the biggest question in their lives, with all the marbles on the table and their very existence hanging in the balance, no questions.
In 2012, we have a very different scenario, however.
After four years under a communist Obama dictatorship crippling our economy, igniting unrest all over the globe, destroying our Constitutional Republic, stampeding our freedoms and liberties into the ground along with our fundamental social fabric, Americans can now see who and what Barack Hussein Obama is… Beyond wearing a Soviet Uniform or Muslim towel to his future press conferences, there is little more he can do to prove who and what he really is.
Can Americans discern what they see and do they have the backbone to unselfishly do what must be done, all personal agendas aside?
Will Americans vote for Communism again? Will Americans fall for the same set of lies they fell for in 2008? Will Americans ignore the treachery of the last four years and place their hopes in someone they now know, isn’t who he says he is?
I’d like to believe not, but only time will tell.
People say they are not “excited about Mitt Romney.” Who cares? You are not supposed to get “excited” about politicians — Only Chris Matthews gets a “tingle up his leg” when comrades speak. Americans aren’t supposed to like or trust any politician. Americans are not supposed to revere or fear their government – “When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.” – Thomas Jefferson
Surely, my fellow Americans understand that they have only ONE chance to remove a communist cabal from power peacefully. That chance is November 6, 2012… Who can afford to focus on anything else?
No true Patriot will be sitting out the election at home this time. No decent American will sit on the sidelines in some futile 3rd party fantasy or protest. There is simply too much at stake.
We currently have a known enemy of our nation residing in the people’s White House. The people didn’t have the good sense to stop it in 2008. The courts didn’t have the courage to stop it or rectify the disaster after the 2008 election. Congress hasn’t had the backbone to correct the fraud and hold all accountable, even after the 2010 cycle that swept so-called Tea Party candidates into political power. Not even state governments have the honor and courage to block a known fraud from appearing on the ballot again in 2012.
That means that righting the greatest wrong ever perpetrated in American politics is left to the American people alone. They will get ONE CHANCE to end this charade, peacefully, on November 6th. If they fail to end it peacefully, they will be left with only a Second Amendment solution. There is no other solution at that point.
My opinion is that, people who lack the decency and courage to right this wrong peacefully in the election booth, also lack the decency and courage to right this wrong via any other means, especially a Second Amendment method. If they sit out the election, they will sit out the battle in the streets too.
People, who lack the decency and courage to stand up, show up and fight in the election booth, won’t have anything it takes to stand up and fight in the streets either. Trust me on this! — Once a self-centered coward, always a self-centered coward.
When did communism become an American Dream for some? A long time ago… When the American people allowed it.
When did the communist dream become acceptable to the rest of America? Only YOU can answer this one, on November 6th, 2012.
No American can afford to sit this one out or play childish games with fantasy candidates. — Removing this criminal communist cabal from power is the ONLY relevant issue of the 2012 election. Only a traitor, a coward or a fool would tell you any different!
JB Williams is a business man, a husband, a father, and a writer. A no nonsense commentator on American politics, American history, and American philosophy. He is published nationwide and in many countries around the world. He is also a Founder of The United States Patriots Union and a staunch conservative actively engaged in returning the power to the right people in America. Patriots Union | Veteran Defenders | Archives E-Mail: JB.USPU@gmail.com
Dear User,
WND – Holder admits some banks ‘too big to jail’
Refuses to discuss HSBC but confesses failure to prosecute
Published: 03/11/2013 at 9:21 PM
More than three months after the Justice Department administered a virtual slap on the wrist to global banking giant HSBC after a whistleblower’s report to WND of massive fraud was confirmed, Attorney General Eric Holder admitted to a Senate panel he believes some banks are too big to prosecute.
Under questioning before the Senate Judiciary Committee last Wednesday, Holder said he was not referring specifically to HSBC, because it would not be “appropriate,” but the message was clear.
Banks the size of HSBC are “too big to jail,” as a member of the Senate panel put it.
“I am concerned that the size of some of these institutions becomes so large,” the attorney general confessed, “that it does become difficult for us to prosecute them when we are hit with indications that if you do prosecute, if you do bring a criminal charge, it will have a negative impact on the national economy, perhaps even the world economy.
“And I think that is a function of the fact that some of these institutions have become too large,” said Holder.
In December, WND ‘s “Whistleblower of the Year,” John Cruz, called the $1.92 billion fine the U.S. government imposed on HSBC “a joke” and filed a $10 million lawsuit for “retaliation and wrongful termination.”
Significantly, the HSBC settlement with the Justice Department allowed all bank officers and directors who may have been aware of or participated in the illegal activities to be free of criminal investigation and prosecution in exchange for HSBC agreeing to pay the $1.92 billion fine.
Whistleblowers in India and London joined Cruz in charging the HSBC settlement amounts to a massive “cover up.” Avoiding criminal investigation and prosecution, they said, allows not only HSBC bank officers and directors to avoid further public scrutiny but also any government officials who may have turned a blind eye to HSBC improprieties.
At the Senate hearing last week, Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, asked Holder to explain why federal and state authorities decided not to indict HSBC after it admitted funneling cash to Mexican drug cartels, helping rogue regimes avoid sanctions and assisting Saudi banks tied to terrorism.
The senator said, “I’m concerned that we have a mentality of too-big-to-jail in the financial sector of spreading from fraud cases to terrorist financing and money laundering cases – and I cite HSBC.”
Holder replied: “The concern that you have raised is one that I, frankly, share.”
However, Holder said he was not specifically referring to HSBC, because it would not be “appropriate.”
“Again, I’m not talking about HSBC,” he said. “This is just a – a more general comment. I think it has an inhibiting influence – impact on our ability to bring resolutions that I think would be more appropriate. And I think that is something that we – you all need to – need to consider. So the concern that you raised is actually one that I share.”
Cruz has insisted to WND that it is impossible to believe HSBC laundered billions of dollars in Mexican drug cartel money, worked with terrorists through affiliate banking operations in Saudi Arabia and circumvented Obama administration banking sanctions against Iran – all activities specifically charged by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations – without the knowledge and perhaps complicity of U.S. government officials in the U.S. Treasury, the Federal Reserve, the CIA and the NSA in an era in which government officials are capable of reading the emails of ordinary citizens.
In response to WND’s reporting earlier this year of Cruz’s evidence, HSBC lodged a complaint that blocked Internet access to one of the WND stories, and senior reporter Jerome Corsi was fired by the New York City investment firm he had worked with for two years as a senior managing director, Gilford Securities.
In June, WND reported evidence Holder’s Justice Department has not investigated money-laundering charges in deference to bank clients of his Washington-based law firm, where Holder was a partner prior to joining the Obama administration.
WND reported in October HSBC was engaged in a systematic scheme to defraud citizens of India who live abroad out of billion of dollars in investment accounts, according to an Indian source who provided evidence.
Not his job
Commenting on Holder’s testimony last Wednesday, New York Times Editorial Page Editor Juliet Lapidos wrote on his blog: “It’s nice and all that Mr. Holder cares about the stability of the global financial system, but that is not Mr. Holder’s job. As attorney general he is the country’s top law enforcement officer, and in that capacity he should prosecute criminals and criminal institutions.”
Lapidos noted a New York Times editorial after the Justice Department decided not to indict HSBC in December that said “when prosecutors choose not to prosecute to the full extent of the law in a case as egregious as this, the law itself is diminished.”
“The deterrence that comes from the threat of criminal prosecution is weakened, if not lost,” the paper said.
Freshman Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., weighed in on the issue at a Senate hearing Thursday, asking federal regulators with the Treasury Department why they are not stopping banks from allowing money laundering.
The regulators placed the blame on Holder’s Justice Department, insisting they could do nothing unless Justice brought a criminal case and secured a conviction.
See WND’s two-part interview with John Cruz:
VIDEOS REFUSED TO EMBED. USE URL:
Part I http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/holder-admits-some-banks-too-big-to-jail/#ooid=5sOWZuNDpwl4f2iV3oI5Fg_BQgOyuER2
Part II http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/holder-admits-some-banks-too-big-to-jail/#ooid=kzcG5uNDrdfa-srhtZ4aRiu5xTZoshR7
http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/holder-admits-some-banks-too-big-to-jail/
Rate this: