NC DEM VOTES FOUR TIMES ALREADY, PLANS TO VOTE AGAIN TOMORROW
NAACP OBAMA-ACTIVISTS SET-UP CAMP
U.N. OBSERVERS SAY STATES OUT OF LINE FOR PUSHING BACK
ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES CHANGE VOTES FOR ROMNEY INTO VOTES FOR OBAMA
America, it’s happening.
The Leftwing is up to no good when it comes to the sanctity of our election and we’ve only got one day to fight back and demand a Congressional investigation NOW, so that the intimidation, the fraud and the international interference will not be swept under the rug regardless of the victor.
From Ohio to Nevada (and who knows where else), voting machines are selecting “Obama” when early voters cast their vote for Romney — and it happens repeatedly when voters catch the error before submitting their ballot and try again only to wind up with Obama, again.
A North Carolina Democrat bragged on Facebook about voting four times already and planning to vote a fifth time tomorrow.
Early voting Somalis — with their TRANSLATORS — are arriving at polling stations by the busloads courtesy of Obama supporters. (Now, we don’t know about you, but we don’t know any U.S. CITIZENS that do not either speak or read English well-enough to vote…)
In Florida, conservative voters are receiving bogus letters falsely informing them that he or she will be unable to vote in this electiondue to miscellaneous (and non-existent) voter registration issues.
And if all that wasn’t bad enough, the Obama-bots even have the help of an international body condemning our states trying to stand up to the infiltration of our polling booths!
The United Nations-linked Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), a 56-country security and conflict resolution organization that includes the United States — is sending 44 observers in different states to have meetings with “stakeholders,” including candidates, local media and 13 election analysts in Washington.
Their purpose: to “monitor” our polling places to seek out conservative “voter suppression” schemes.
When Texas threatened potential prosecutions against those “observers” sent, the Obama State Department was quick to offer the OSCE “full” diplomatic immunity — but it didn’t stop there.
On Oct. 23, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbot sent a strongly worded letter to the meddling organization reminding the group that its monitors could be prosecuted if they violate state law or are found within 100 feet of a polling place.
The OSCE then responded it would monitor election “compliance” with unspecified “international obligations” to its dictatorial member-states, including RUSSIA, KAZAKHSTAN and BELARUS.
As The New American reports, the OSCE’s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) monitoring operations responded to Texas’ challenge: “The United States, like all countries in the OSCE, has an obligation to invite ODIHR observers to observe its elections.”
The OSCE may claim that there are “no sovereignty issues” here, but according to an Oct. 26 press conference, State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland claimed that “in general, we give them protected status.”
Shouldn’t it be the other way around? Shouldn’t our states, our elections, be given “protected status” from the United Nations’ Leftwing agenda?
These international imposers are using Leftist arguments that requiring proof of identity or U.S. Citizenship is somehow disenfranchising would-be minority or poor voters.
Ironically, the OSCE’s U.S. election monitoring boss, diplomat Daan Everts, is from the Netherlands, which requires ALL voters to present identification TO COMBAT FRAUD. Talk about a double-standard.
But no matter how many heartstrings they try to pull, we know that the United States of America has an obligation to NO ONE but ourselves when it comes to our elections.
As a nation governed BY THE PEOPLE, we will not submit to an international entity that has been in closed door meetings and exchanged letters with Obama-linked organizations like ACORN, the NAACP, the ACLU, and “Project Vote” (or ACORN reformed under a new name after its collapse following massive voting fraud in 2008).
DO NOT LET THE LEFTWING HIDE BEHIND THE U.N. AND SABOTAGE TUESDAY’S VOTE!
SELECT HERE TO HELP US DEMAND CONGRESS KICK THESE GLOBAL GOVERNMENT NANNIES OUT!
Conservative U.S. Senate candidate Ted Cruz, who has made protecting America’s sovereignty against national organizations like the UN and the OSCE a priority, and Texas Gov. Rick Perry are fighting to stop the international infiltration of our elections — Abbot even offered to teach the freedom-crushing member states how democracy works given the rampant vote-rigging in those countries.
In a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Abbot warned: “The fact that representatives of the United States joined the U.S.S.R, Yugoslavia, Romania, and other OSCE member-nations in signing a document at a 1989 conference in Copenhagen has absolutely no bearing on the administration of elections or laws governing elections in the State of Texas.”
Although the OSCE has since responded that they fully intend to comply with state laws, Abbot remains a skeptic and so do we because of the very real chance that the OSCE’s so-called election monitoring activities are just a sly way to push through a socialist, big government political agenda, one that that Barack Obama whole-heartedly approves.
MAKE NO MISTAKE: The “monitors” intend to make sure that any request for documentation or otherwise prevent ineligible voters from voting is met with hundreds of thousands — if not millions — of dollars’ worth of international lawsuits — just in case any state, like Texas, should choose to enforce its own LEGAL voting laws.
The Republican National Committee is taking swift action against the fixed voting machines in six states, requesting that they be recalibrated before the election, that additional technicians are on site, and that sign and verbal notification is given to voters to double-check their electronic ballots.
It’s time for us to do our part and demand that Congress take IMMEDIATE action to stop the international infiltration of our polling places, and the deadline to send these meddling “monitors” home is just one day away.
Please, SELECT HERE to help us kick these global government nannies out of our voting booths.
The Editors
American Conservative PAC
- THIS SHOULD WORK -
About Stephani Scruggs:
by Judson Phillips
America’s swan song? “We are not coming back”
This was sent to me on March 23rd. It needs to be read, and sent to those who still have an ear to hear.
I am forwarding this email but sadly most won’t read it. “Oh boy, Michael is sending another political email.” I haven’t sent any since the election mainly because I realized that most people don’t care about politics, ergo, they don’t care about our nation. Everybody seems to be only centered on themselves these days. But what most don’t realize is what goes for the country goes for each of us. This article sums up the attitude of Americans and how this once great country will no longer be great again. I would just like to thank those who contribute to this. Truth hurts sometimes!
Please take a moment to digest this provocative article by a Jewish Rabbi From Teaneck, N.J.
It is far and away the most succinct and thoughtful explanation of how our nation is changing. The article appeared in The Israel National News, and is directed to Jewish readership. 70% of American Jews vote as Democrats. The Rabbi has some interesting comments in that regard.
Rabbi Steven Pruzansky is the spiritual leader of Congregation Bnai Yeshurun in Teaneck, New Jersey
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
“The most charitable way of explaining the election results of 2012 is that Americans voted for the status quo – for the incumbent President and for a divided Congress. They must enjoy gridlock, partisanship, incompetence, economic stagnation and avoidance of responsibility. And fewer people voted.
But as we awake from the nightmare, it is important to eschew the facile explanations for the Romney defeat that will prevail among the chattering classes. Romney did not lose because of the effects of Hurricane Sandy that devastated this area, nor did he lose because he ran a poor campaign, nor did he lose because the Republicans could have chosen better candidates, nor did he lose because Obama benefited from a slight uptick in the economy due to the business cycle.
Romney lost because he didn’t get enough votes to win.
That might seem obvious, but not for the obvious reasons. Romney lost because the conservative virtues – the traditional American virtues – of liberty, hard work, free enterprise, private initiative and aspirations to moral greatness – no longer inspire or animate a majority of the electorate.
The simplest reason why Romney lost was because it is impossible to compete against free stuff.
Every businessman knows this; that is why the “loss leader” or the giveaway is such a powerful marketing tool. Obama’s America is one in which free stuff is given away: the adults among the 47,000,000 on food stamps clearly recognized for whom they should vote, and so they did, by the tens of millions; those who – courtesy of Obama – receive two full years of unemployment benefits (which, of course, both disincentivizes looking for work and also motivates people to work off the books while collecting their windfall) surely know for whom to vote. The lure of free stuff is irresistible.
The defining moment of the whole campaign was the revelation of the secretly-recorded video in which Romney acknowledged the difficulty of winning an election in which “47% of the people” start off against him because they pay no taxes and just receive money – “free stuff” – from the government.
Almost half of the population has no skin in the game – they don’t care about high taxes, promoting business, or creating jobs, nor do they care that the money for their free stuff is being borrowed from their children and from the Chinese.
They just want the free stuff that comes their way at someone else’s expense. In the end, that 47% leaves very little margin for error for any Republican, and does not bode well for the future.
It is impossible to imagine a conservative candidate winning against such overwhelming odds. People do vote their pocketbooks. In essence, the people vote for a Congress who will not raise their taxes, and for a resident who will give them free stuff, never mind who has to pay for it.
That engenders the second reason why Romney lost: the inescapable conclusion that the electorate is ignorant and uninformed. Indeed, it does not pay to be an informed voter, because most other voters – the clear majority – are unintelligent and easily swayed by emotion and raw populism. That is the indelicate way of saying that too many people vote with their hearts and not their heads. That is why Obama did not have to produce a second term agenda, or even defend his first-term record. He needed only to portray Mitt Romney as a rapacious capitalist who throws elderly women over a cliff, when he is not just snatching away their cancer medication, while starving the poor and cutting taxes for the rich.
During his 1956 presidential campaign, a woman called out to Adlai Stevenson: “Senator, you have the vote of every thinking person!” Stevenson called back: “That’s not enough, madam, we need a majority!” Truer words were never spoken.
Obama could get away with saying that “Romney wants the rich to play by a different set of rules” – without ever defining what those different rules were; with saying that the “rich should pay their fair share” – without ever defining what a “fair share” is; with saying that Romney wants the poor, elderly and sick to “fend for themselves” – without even acknowledging that all these government programs are going bankrupt, their current insolvency only papered over by deficit spending.
Similarly, Obama (or his surrogates) could hint to blacks that a Romney victory would lead them back into chains and proclaim to women that their abortions and birth control would be taken away. He could appeal to Hispanics that Romney would have them all arrested and shipped to Mexico and unabashedly state that he will not enforce the current immigration laws. He could espouse the furtherance of the incestuous relationship between governments and unions – in which politicians ply the unions with public money, in exchange for which the unions provide the politicians with votes, in exchange for which the politicians provide more money and the unions provide more votes, etc., even though the money is gone.
Obama also knows that the electorate has changed – that whites will soon be a minority in America (they’re already a minority in California) and that the new immigrants to the US are primarily from the Third World and do not share the traditional American values that attracted immigrants in the 19th and 20th centuries. It is a different world, and a different America. Obama is part of that different America, knows it, and knows how to tap into it. That is why he won.
Obama also proved again that negative advertising works, invective sells, and harsh personal attacks succeed. That Romney never engaged in such diatribes points to his essential goodness as a person; his “negative ads” were simple facts, never personal abuse – facts about high unemployment, lower take-home pay, a loss of American power and prestige abroad, a lack of leadership, etc. As a politician, though, Romney failed because he did not embrace the devil’s bargain of making unsustainable promises. It turned out that it was not possible for Romney and Ryan – people of substance, depth and ideas – to compete with the shallow populism and platitudes of their opponents. Obama mastered the politics of envy – of class warfare – never reaching out to Americans as such but to individual groups, and cobbling together a winning majority from these minority groups. If an Obama could not be defeated – with his record and his vision of America, in which free stuff seduces voters – it is hard to envision any change in the future.
The road to Hillary Clinton in 2016 and to a European-socialist economy – those very economies that are collapsing today in Europe – is paved.
For Jews, mostly assimilated anyway and staunch Democrats, the results demonstrate again that liberalism is their Torah. Almost 70% voted for a president widely perceived by Israelis and most committed Jews as hostile to Israel. They voted to secure Obama’s future at America’s expense and at Israel’s expense – in effect, preferring Obama to Netanyahu by a wide margin.
A dangerous time is ahead. Under present circumstances, it is inconceivable that the US will take any aggressive action against Iran and will more likely thwart any Israeli initiative. The US will preach the importance of negotiations up until the production of the first Iranian nuclear weapon-and then state that the world must learn to live with this new reality.
But this election should be a wake-up call to Jews. There is no permanent empire, nor is there is an enduring haven for Jews anywhere in the exile. The American empire began to decline in 2007, and the deterioration has been exacerbated in the last five years. This election only hastens that decline. Society is permeated with sloth, greed, envy and materialistic excess. It has lost its moorings and its moral foundations.. The takers outnumber the givers, and that will only increase in years to come.
The “Occupy” riots across this country in the last two years were mere dress rehearsals for what lies ahead – years of unrest sparked by the increasing discontent of the unsuccessful who want to seize the fruits and the bounty of the successful, and do not appreciate the slow pace of redistribution. If this election proves one thing, it is that the Old America is gone.
And, sad for the world, it is not coming back.”
Rate this: