Category: Internet safety


If You’re Using ‘Password1,’ Change It. Now.

The number one way hackers get into protected systems isn’t through a fancy technical exploit. It’s by guessing the password.

That’s not too hard when the most common password used on business systems is “Password1.”

There’s a technical reason for Password1′s popularity: It’s got an upper-case letter, a number and nine characters. That satisfies the complexity rules for many systems, including the default settings for Microsoft’s widely used Active Directory identity management software.

Security services firm Trustwave spotlighted the “Password1″ problem in its recently released “2012 Global Security Report,” which summarizes the firm’s findings from nearly 2 million network vulnerability scans and 300 recent security breach investigations.

Around 5% of passwords involve a variation of the word “password,” the company’s researchers found. The runner-up, “welcome,” turns up in more than 1%.

Easily guessable or entirely blank passwords were the most common vulnerability Trustwave’s SpiderLabs unit found in its penetration tests last year on clients’ systems. The firm set an assortment of widely available password-cracking tools loose on 2.5 million passwords, and successfully broke more than 200,000 of them.

Verizon came up with similar results in its 2012 Data Breach Investigations Report, one of the security industry’s most comprehensive annual studies. The full report will be released in several months, but Verizon previewed some of its findings at this week’s RSA conference in San Francisco.

Exploiting weak or guessable passwords was the top method attackers used to gain access last year. It played a role in 29% of the security breaches Verizon’s response team investigated.

[Related: Smartphone Features You Don't Really Need]

Verizon’s scariest finding was that attackers are often inside victims’ networks for months or years before they’re discovered. Less than 20% of the intrusions Verizon studied were discovered within days, let alone hours.

Even scarier: Few companies discovered the breach on their own. More than two-thirds learned they’d been attacked only after an external party, such as a law-enforcement agency, notified them. Trustwave’s findings were almost identical: Only 16% of the cases it investigated last year were internally detected.

So if your password is something guessable, what’s the best way to make it more secure? Make it longer.

Adding complexity to your password — swapping “password” for “p@S$w0rd” — protects against so-called “dictionary” attacks, which automatically check against a list of standard words.

But attackers are increasingly using brute-force tools that simply cycle through all possible character combinations. Length is the only effective guard against those. A seven-character password has 70 trillion possible combinations; an eight-character password takes that to more than 6 quadrillion.

Even a few quadrillion options isn’t a big deal for modern machines, though. Using a $1,500 computer built with off-the-shelf parts, it took Trustwave just 10 hours to harvest its 200,000 broken passwords.

“We’ve got to get ourselves using stuff larger than human memory capacity,” independent security researcher Dan Kaminsky said during an RSA presentation on why passwords don’t work.

He acknowledged that it’s an uphill fight. Biometric authentication, smartcards, one-time key generators and other solutions can increase security, but at the cost of adding complexity.

“The fundamental win of the password over every other authentication technology is its utter simplicity on every device,” Kaminsky said. “This is, of course, also their fundamental failing.” To top of page

RSTRUI

 

RSTRUI – Six letters you shouldn’t ever forget

Here’s a tip you won’t remember until you need it. But this little tip can pull you out of some serious problems. There are several new rogue security programs on the Web, and they all follow the same M.O.

Thousands of rogues are currently being distributed on the Web or by email. There are new ones appearing every day, and most of the time the new ones are simply old ones with new names and updated user interfaces.

Some of these rogues spawn full-page alerts (or pop-ups) that always stay on top of all other windows, no matter what you do. These kind are particularly annoying because you can’t access your browser, Windows Explorer or any other program because the rogue window is always on top. Some of these full page alerts and pop-ups have no “X” in the top-right corner with which to close them, some do but the “x” does not work, while some work but only close the alert or pop-up window momentarily.

You can get these rogues simply by visiting a web site or by clicking an attachment in an email. We wish we could give you a list of these sites but there isn’t any way to do that. The sites distributing these rogues may be legitimate sites which have been duped into “selling” these rogues; they may sites which are owned by less-than-honest business people who are trying to make a quick buck by partnering with the crooks who make these rogue security products; or they maybe sites created by the crooks themselves. And even if we could give you a list of sites – it would change and grow every day – there’s just no way to keep up with them. But you don’t need to know the sites, all you need to know is this:

When a warning appears telling you that a virus or Trojan has been detected on your computer – DO NOT PANIC. Take a deep breath. Look carefully at the warning. Pay no attention to fancy Windows-like graphics. Look to see if the name of your security program(s) appear anywhere on that warning. If you use Avast – does it say Avast? If you use Microsoft Security Essentials, does it say that? If you use SUPERAntiSpyware – does it say SUPERAntiSpyware?

You get the picture. If it’s a rogue – it won’t know what security software you have installed, but the alert usually will have a legitimate sounding name on it – like Windows Internet Security 2011. Clean This, Windows AntiVirus 2011 or similar.

You’re going to have to reach down and hold on – take a deep breath and use all your willpower so you don’t click the “Scan and clean my computer now” button. Remember, if you do click the scan and clean button on one of these rogues, you’ll be installing it. And if you do actually install one of these rogues, you’re going to have a lot more problems.

If you make a mistake and become infected or click a link that causes you to be infected, it’s important that you don’t panic. You can recover from this type of attack, but you need to stay calm and not do anything crazy like click “Purchase … now”, or “Clean your computer now”, or “Activate now”.

A number of these newer rogues are ingenious in their design. Their pop-ups cover your entire screen when you start your computer. And you’ll have no way to minimize or close it – they give you one easy choice. The choice you’ll have is to buy the rogue security program by clicking the button on the pop-up which says “Buy now and clean your computer”, or similar. It can be very frustrating to users – many of whom don’t know how to get this pop-up off their screens. You can’t use ALT F4 to close it. There is no X in the top right corner, there is no icon on your task bar to right-click and close – and sometimes you can’t see your task bar at all anyway.

If this happens to you – and it will happen to you sooner-or-later – there is a very simple solution. But you have to remember it and you have to remember not to panic. Here is the simple solution:

1. Shut your computer down. The only way you’ll be able to shut down is by turning off your computer. Use the power switch. You may not be able to shut down normally because your start button will be covered by the pop-up. (Some of the rogue’s cover everything but the task bar and the start button – but when you click anything on the task bar, the rogue pop-up reappears as soon as you click “Start” or anything else.)

2. Now after your computer has been shut down for at least a minute, turn the power button on and keep tapping the F8 key while Windows is booting. This will open your Safe Mode options. Choose “Safe Mode with Command Prompt”. This is the only option you should use in this scenario. The reason? Because it doesn’t start Windows Explorer – it opens a Window CMD window – the black and spooky “DOS window”. But have no fear. Your computer is not connected to the Internet. You’ve isolated your machine.

3. When the command window opens – and this can take some time so be patient – you’ll see something like C:WindowsSystem32>

When you see C:WindowsSystem32 > type ‘rstrui.exe’ and press the Enter key.

Sit back, grab some coffee and wait. It may take 5 or 6 minutes before you see anything change. But don’t worry, eventually it will change.

After a few minutes you’ll see the System Restore dialog appear. And when it does, start breathing easier because you’re almost home free. Choose a restore point at least 24 hours prior to the time you were attacked. After you have selected a System Restore point, go ahead and restore your computer. After a few minutes your computer will reboot. When Windows boots, your rogue security program will be gone, no more pop-ups, no more trouble – it will be like nothing ever happened.

And the best thing is – you won’t lose any emails, photos, music files, or documents, etc. The only thing you’ll lose is any program(s) you’ve installed since the restore point you chose.

This tip can be used for many other problems too. Safe Mode with Command Prompt does not even load the Windows shell – but it does load the Windows system files, so you can access other Windows tools and features from the Command Prompt.

The key is RSTRUI.EXE and accessing it from Safe Mode with Command Prompt. Because when you do you can go back in time and get rid of the rogue and all the changes it made to your system. And your computer will be back to normal. It will be like the problem had never even happened.

 

Posted by Prof. Charles Xavier  on PAN, July 19, 2011

 THE USUAL SUSPECTS


Look who Obama’s hired for cybersecurity team


Ex-Clinton staffer ‘lost’ thousands of White House e-mails, booted by DHS for faking credentials

 

Posted: July 18, 2011
8:13 pm Eastern
© 2011 WND

 

An elite team of computer technicians assembled by the Obama administration to protect Pentagon networks from cyberattack shockingly includes a former Clinton official who “lost” thousands of archived emails under subpoena and who more recently left the Department of Homeland Security under an ethical cloud related to her qualifications, WND has learned.


Laura Crabtree Callahan

 

The administration in May quietly hired Laura Callahan for a sensitive post at the U.S. Cyber Command, a newly created agency set up to harden military networks as part of an effort to prevent a “cyberspace version of Pearl Harbor.”

The move raises doubts about the administration’s vetting process for sensitive security positions. In 2004, Callahan was forced to resign from Homeland Security after a congressional investigation revealed she committed résumé fraud and lied about her computer credentials.

Investigators found that Callahan paid a diploma mill thousands of dollars for her bachelors, masters and doctorate degrees in computer science. She back-dated the degrees, all obtained between 2000 and 2001, to appear as if she earned them in 1993, 1995 and 2000, respectively. She landed the job of deputy DHS chief information officer in 2003.

Read more: Look who Obama’s hired for cybersecurity team http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=323373#ixzz1SZ8S8n1T

 

I still say

 

<img src="http://www.wnd.com/images/email/shop/2446.gif" alt="Throw

 

 

Posted by Prof. Charles Xavier  on PAN,  June 15, 2011

PROTECT IP: A looming threat to liberty

By Patrick Ruffini,

The Internet as we know it is at risk.

At the state and Federal level, there is a move afoot to impose an Internet sales tax, a once unthinkable prospect. Obama regulatory agencies are launching new investigations into online services right and left. And the French, as part of the G-8 summit, held a conference last month with the stated goal of helping the world’s governments “civilize” the Wild West of cyberspace.


Sponsor

Most dangerous of all is a bill to grant Attorney General Eric Holder a Kill Switch over individual websites, erasing them from the Web and from search results. Known as the PROTECT IP Act and sponsored by Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Orrin Hatch (R-UT), this bill would place the United States in a small group of countries that filter the Web. The list includes some of the world’s most brutal and undemocratic regimes: Iran, China, Syria, Cuba, Saudi Arabia, Burma, and pre-revolutionary Egypt.

That a bill sanctioning wanton censorship of the Internet would advance this far is a testament to the political power of Hollywood and the big labor unions that support it. PROTECT IP’s stated objective is to stamp out copyright infringement, but given the broad and draconian website shutdown powers it grants the Obama Administration, it’s no surprise that some see something else at play. “Giving the government the power to shut down dissent,” was HotAir’s take on an earlier version of this bill. A coalition that includes conservative online voices, of which I’m part, has also mobilized to stop the power grab at DontCensortheNet.com.

PROTECT IP is a bonanza for another group not exactly known as a friend to liberty: trial lawyers. Its proponents actually inserted a provision known as a “private right of action” that would give virtually anyone the right to sue to take a website offline. Anyone involved in expressing a legitimate political opinion online knows what this means: Threats and lawsuits disguised as copyright actions meant to silence points of view different than the “artist.” In Nevada, the copyright trolling law firm Righthaven has made a sport out of suing bloggers for small news clippings posted on their sites, an even targeted conservative Sharron Angle in her race against Harry Reid, threatening to take her website offline.

Just as troubling is a government requirement that search engines alter their results to disappear offending sites. Is this the United States of America, or communist China?

It may shock you, but as bad as this bill sounds, Internet censorship is already underway in the Obama Administration. The Department of Homeland Security and Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is supposed to protect our borders, but instead, it’s busy playing Internet censor-in-chief. A few months ago, ICE seized 84,000 innocent websites by mistake, slapping a notice on the home pages of small businesses and doctors’ offices that the proprietors were under investigation for child pornography.

Meanwhile, Internet engineers — and pretty much anyone who understands how the Internet works — doubt the bill would do much to deal with its stated objective of stopping piracy. Websites seized by the Obama Administration are already back to doing a brisk business, because the procedure in question only blocks the domain name, not the content itself. Like water always finding its way through the cracks, there are countless ways to get at material both good and bad other than typing an website’s address in a browser bar.

It’s no coincidence that virtually the only part of our economy that’s growing right now is the technology industry, and that’s because the Internet has largely escaped the dead weight of government regulation. A war is being waged on multiple fronts by those threatened by the Internet to use the government to put its competition out of business. Sadly, some Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which has rubberstamped Internet censorship, have made the calculation that they’d prefer cozying up to the Hollywood Left for campaign cash than standing for the principles of liberty that have helped make the Web a flourishing hotbed of innovation.

Fortunately, the Internet is starting to take notice and fight back. PopVox, a website that measures public responses to proposed legislation, reports that a whopping 89% of people who have written to their member of Congress through its site have done so to oppose this latest effort to censor the Internet.

- – - -

Patrick Ruffini is co-founder of Don’t Censor The Net

- – - -

Please note: Comments made by opinion columnists are their own and may not be the opinions or views of Liberty Extra or its staff.

Sponsor Note:

America’s 4th War! As The Wall Street Journal puts it, this new enemy poses “a threat equal to that of weapons of mass destruction.”

 

  • Posted by Prof. Charles Xavier  on PAN,  August 4, 2011
I refrain from saying “I told you so”… PAN members, and everyone else ought to either divest themselves of these social blogs, or risk the consequences. My first involvement with social sites was with JibJab. It was there that I started the Professor X persona, and had an image of Patrick Stewart as my Avatar.

 
 

WND Exclusive


LIFE WITH BIG BROTHER

Your face on Facebook ‘your own worst enemy’


New technology can steal Social Security Numbers


Posted: August 03, 2011
8:05 pm Eastern

By Steve Elwart
© 2011 WND

Using publicly available data, it is now possible to identify strangers and gain their personal information – even their Social Security numbers – by using facial recognition software and social media profiles, according to a new study to be presented tomorrow at the Black Hat Security Conference in Las Vegas.

Professor Alessandro Acquisti from Carnegie Mellon University and his research team studied the implications of the combining, or “mash-up,” of three technologies: face recognition, cloud computing (an Internet technology) and social networks.

The team studied the possibility of using publicly available Internet data and commercially available facial recognition software to reveal more information about a person than was intended.

What else is going on? Read the book “Spychips ” and find out!

In work that was funded by the National Science Foundation and the U.S… the team noted that Google has acquired Neven Visions, Riya and PittPatt and deployed face recognition into Picasa.

(Story continues below)

Further, “Apple has acquired Polar Rose, and deployed face recognition into iPhoto. Facebook has licensed Face.com to enable automated tagging. So far, however, these end-user Web 2.0 applications are limited in scope: They are constrained by, and within, the boundaries of the service in which they are deployed. Our focus, however, was on examining whether the convergence of publicly available Web 2.0 data, cheap cloud computing, data mining, and off-the-shelf face recognition is bringing us closer to a world where anyone may run face recognition on anyone else, online and offline – and then infer additional, sensitive data about the target subject, starting merely from one anonymous piece of information about her: the face.”

Acquisti noted that last year, more than 2.5 billion photos were uploaded by Facebook users per month. These users also use their real names, addresses, birthdates and other contact information as part of their profiles on social media such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Google-Plus and others, and in many cases the information is visible to the entire world.

Read more: Your face on Facebook ‘your own worst enemy’http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=329441#ixzz1U64gcVxo

I Originally Posted on PAN - May 18, 2011

Note: since this was last posted, Facebook’s privacy problems have become worse, not better, even appearing on the evening news. Now it appears that -like YouTube- Conservative and Christian blogs are being targeted.
I was -very briefly- on Facebook, and went to some lengths to make sure the account was deleted, NOT “dormant” as was their policy.
The following was taken from an ALIPAC (americans for legal immigration pg). I was surprised to see it there, but all the same, this only makes me feel relief that I divested myself of them long ago.
 
Six reasons to hate Facebook’s new anti-privacy system, “Connections”
May 4, 2010  Wondering exactly why people are so pissed about Facebook’s latest display of contempt for user privacy?  The  Electronic Frontier Frontier Foundation’s Kurt Opsahl has a good, short article explaining just what’s going on with the new “Connections” anti-feature:
 
1. Facebook will not let you share any of this information without using Connections. You cannot opt-out of Connections. If you refuse to play ball, Facebook will remove all unlinked information from your profile.

2. Facebook will not respect your old privacy settings in this transition. For example, if you had previously sought to share your Interests with “Only Friends,” Facebook will now ignore this and share your Connections with “Everyone.”

3. Facebook has removed your ability to restrict its use of this information. The new privacy controls only affect your information’s “Visibility,” not whether it is “publicly available.”

Explaining what “publicly available” means, Facebook writes: “Such information may, for example, be accessed by everyone on the Internet (including people not logged into Facebook), be indexed by third party search engines, and be imported, exported, distributed, and redistributed by us and others without privacy limitations.”

4. Facebook will continue to store and use your Connections even after you delete them. Just because you can’t see them doesn’t mean they’re not there. Even after you “delete” profile information, Facebook will remember it. We’ve also received reports that Facebook continues to use deleted profile information to help people find you through Facebook’s search engine.

5. Facebook sometimes creates a Connection when you “Like” something. That “Like” button you see all over Facebook, and now all over the web? It too can sometimes add a Connection to your profile, without you even knowing it.

6. Facebook sometimes creates a Connection when you post to your wall. If you use the name of a Connection in a post on your wall, it may show up on the Connection Page, without you even knowing it. (For example, if you use the word “FBI” in a post).

I confess that I haven’t paid much attention to this. It came up while I was on holidays, and I hate Facebook and never use it (I have a profile, but haven’t logged in for years). But holy crap, that is the most reprehensible bit of corporate awfulness I’ve seen in months.

Six Things You Need to Know About Facebook Connections
Previously:

* Facebook privacy meltdown: company removed opt-out prior to launch …
* Facebook and the Social Dynamics of Privacy
* Infographic: Facebook’s “anti-privacy monopoly”
* Facebook further reduces privacy control for users
* Timeline of Facebook privacy policy: from reasonable (2005) to …
* US Senator wants FTC to regulate privacy on Facebook, other social …
* More Facebook privacy woes: rogue marketers can data-mine your …
* Interview with Facebook employee will not make you feel better …

http://www.boingboing.net/2010/05/04/six-reasons-to-hate.html

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 44 other followers