NDAA, U.N., america, apostacy, christianity, faith, government, prophecy, socalism
Archive for June, 2012
(Be sure to read the Scopes verification at the end)
Keep your eye on Waukesha, Wisconsin……Their biggest employer just moved out.
GE Electric is planning to move its 115-year-old X-ray division from Waukesha, Wis., to Beijing. In case you didn’t know, this is in China.
In addition to moving the headquarters, the company will invest $2 billion in China and train more than 65 engineers and create six research centers.
This is the same GE that made $5.1 billion in the United States last year, but paid no taxes – the same company that employs more people overseas than it does in the United States.
So let me get this straight. President Obama appointed GE Chairman Jeff Immelt to head his commission on job creation (job czar). Immelt is supposed to help create jobs. I guess the President forgot to tell him in which country he was supposed to be creating those jobs.
Thanks Jeff, you’re a “real” American….give Barrack our Best!
If this doesn’t show you the total lack of leadership of this President, I don’t know what does. Please pass this information to others and think about it before you buy any GE product.
For Snopes verification of this information, go to: http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/ge.asp
Posted on June 24, 2012 by Conservative Byte
Weary of defending in court the Constitutional eligibility of their man at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, the Democrat Party has finally admitted Barack Obama is not qualified to be president of the United States– and that it doesn’t matter.
According to a motion filed by Party attorneys in a Tennessee eligibility lawsuit, “…Defendants [the Tennessee Democrat Party and the Democrat National Committee] assert that the Tennessee Democrat Party has the right to nominate whoever it chooses to run as a candidate, including someone who is not qualified for the office.”
In numerous previous lawsuits questioning the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama, Democrats have maintained that voters, not the Constitution, should be the final arbiters of presidential eligibility. Though a disgraceful assertion on its face, such mindless rambling was about all that desperate Democrat attorneys had in their arsenals, apart from the perpetually employed “plaintiffs lack standing” defense.
Continue Reading on www.westernjournalism.com …
Who Are Lateral Love Australia « Lateral Love Australia.
This organization has just started following my blog. How they found me, and what interested them is unknown to me. I just read most of the three pgs on the blog. The “about” pg, which I read last, was so intense that I quit 3/4ths of the way through. As Americans, we are -somewhat- more aware of what the offscourings of European society did to native Americans; though they themselves came to the new world to escape oppression. This blog is a big lesson in regard to the depravity of man and our sin nature. “X”
In just a couple of weeks, we’ll be celebrating our nation’s birthday.
It’s a day I usually spend barbecuing in the backyard with family and friends.
But there is one guest in attendance who did not receive an invite:
Big Brother’s eye in the sky.
While we’re all enjoying the freedom from oppressive government our founding fathers fought for, unmanned drones hover over our heads cataloguing if we separated our recyclables from the garbage.
Drones buzzing over our homes, farms, ranches and businesses, and spying on our every move is a clear violation of our rights.
And that needs to stop. IMMEDIATELY.
I have a plan to put a stop to warrantless government spying by drones that I’ll share with you in a moment, but first I want to take a moment to explain why this fight is so crucial.
You see, you and I are battling powerful forces.
The crony capitalists who make these drones and sell them to the government for hundreds of millions of dollars are joined at the hip with the supporters of the surveillance state.
They feed Big Government’s desire to snoop on every aspect of our lives in exchange for bleeding the taxpayers dry.
We should not be treated like criminals or terrorists for living our everyday lives.
And we should not have our Fourth Amendment rights violated by warrantless government spying.
That’s why I introduced the Preserving Freedom from Unwarranted Surveillance Act of 2012.
This bill:
** Forces law enforcement to obtain a warrant from a judge before dispatching drones to fly over our property.
** Forbids the use of evidence illegally obtained by warrantless drone flights from being used in any criminal, civil or regulatory action.
** Permits citizens to sue the government for any violations of this act.
** Provides exceptions for patrolling the border, to act in the case of imminent danger to human life or high risk of a terrorist attack.
My bill simply restates the Fourth Amendment.
Only in Washington would it be necessary to pass legislation restating the supreme law of the land.
You see, the establishment is already searching for a way to sideline this act.
They snort at any attempt to curtail Big Government’s power to reach into our lives.
Sure, they can try to marginalize me.
But what they can’t ignore is you.
That’s why I’m asking you to sign your “1 Million Strong against Drones” declaration.
The only way you and I are going to get a vote on my bill to end warrantless drone spying is by generating a groundswell of grassroots support that is so overwhelming, the establishment has no choice but to take action.
You’re signed “1 Million Strong against Drones” declaration will send a clear message that either your senators support ALL the amendments of the Bill of Rights or you will find someone else who will.
I AM NO FAN OF MS. BOXER, OK? Bernie has a conscience. I have blogged about GMO’s, and the Hydra Monsanto. Check this out:
In 49 countries around the world, including all of Europe, people have the opportunity of knowing whether or not they are eating food which contains genetically engineered ingredients. In the United States, we don’t. That is why Sen. Bernie Sanders, along with Sen. Barbara Boxer, introduced an amendment to the agriculture bill which will give states the right to require labels on food products which are genetically engineered. A vote on Bernie’s amendment is expected later this week.
Below article from LabelGMOs.org is in CA. (!) Gold font my emphasis. When you shop, look at how many products have “high fructose corn syrup” in them, then note that corn has been engineered to produce its own pesticides. You are what you eat.
What Are We Eating?
Fact: GMO’s have not been proven safe, and the long-term health risks on humans of genetically modified foods have not been adequately investigated.
We have a Right to Know What’s in our Food
We Currently Eat Genetically Engineered Food, But Don’t Know It
A genetically engineered food is a plant or meat product that has had its DNA artificially altered in a laboratory by genes from other plants, animals, viruses, or bacteria, in order to produce foreign compounds in that food. This type of genetic alteration is not found in nature, and is experimental. The correct scientific term is “transgenics,” and is also often referred to as (GE) genetically engineered.
Example: Genetically Modified corn has been engineered in a laboratory to produce pesticides in its own tissue. GMO Corn is regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency as an Insecticide, but is sold unlabeled. [EPA Pesticides]
The Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods Are Unclear
Unlike the strict safety evaluations required for the approval of new drugs, the safety of genetically engineered foods for human consumption is not adequately tested.
There have been NO long-term studies conducted on the safety of genetically engireed foods on humans.
The issue of GM food safety was first discussed at a meeting of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the World Health Organization (WHO) and biotech representatives in 1990. The “substantial equivalence” concept was proposed in early 1996. The adoption of the concept of substantial equivalence allowed permission to market and sell new foods without any safety or toxicology tests as long as they were not too different in chemical composition to foods already on the market. [FDA GRAS proposal] To decide if a modified product is substantially equivalent, the product is tested by the manufacturer for unexpected changes in a limited set of variables such as toxins, nutrients or allergens that are known to be present in the unmodified food. If these tests show no significant difference between the modified and unmodified products, then no further food safety testing is required.
http://www.labelgmos.org/the_science_genetically_modified_foods_gmo
Liberal Logic 101 – Patriot Action Network
Liberal Logic 101 – Patriot Action Network.
Rate this: