Latest Entries »

First, this posting by PAN admin.  Bill Bissell:

Chairman Gowdy comes out swinging in first Benghazi hearing.

Another PAN member, John Pastirchak,  provided the link to this:  Petition to Draft Gowdy for House Speaker–

More than 100,000 patriotic Americans have already called for a conservative to lead the House of Representatives — our last line of defense against Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid.

Will you join the call to draft Trey Gowdy to be the next Speaker of the House – replacing John Boehner who has too often compromised and capitulated to with Barack Obama?


Enough of invertebrate John Boehner! Need encouragement?

Freedom Outpost just posted this as of the 17th:

House Speaker Boehner Preparing To Help ISIS…



Woman or Machine? Sophisticated Japanese She-Bot Blurs the Line

The technology most of us take for granted was non-existant a mere 40 years ago.

We now live in a time where technological advances are so swift as to make the term “planned obsolescence” itself an anachronism. I just read a column by Tea Party Economist blogger Gary North, posted today (9-15):

Is the Terminator Coming? Reflections on Moore’s Law

I invite you to read it first, before continuing.

Having read it in its entirety at his blog, (URL above) I was somewhat surprised by his views, and sent him an e-mail, reproduced here:

Today at 11:54 AM

Well over a year ago I happened to be discussing A.I. with a former Navy Seal. I didn’t ask him personal questions about his security clearance levels etc.; however, he’d know more about the government’s capabilities than us common folks. I had suggested that whatever was permitted in the public domain, the government was about ten years ahead of that info. He responded -ready?- with more like forty years. So with your column in mind:

Watch these videos!


Woman or Machine? Sophisticated Japanese She-Bot Blurs the Line…

Inside Watson’s brain…

Artificial-Intelligence Computer System ‘Watson’ Goes to College…


I look forward to a reply from him. The technology in itself is benign; however we’re crossing a threshold where there is no return, and this is another thing altogether when considering who might control it.

The video clips are going to “blow you away”…

Female Android Geminoid F

Ishiguro last made international headlines in 2006 when he made an android replica of himself, the Geminoid HI-1. For his pioneering work, CNN named him one of eight “geniuses who will change your life,” and the BBC chronicled his story in the 2008 documentary Man-Machine. Ishiguro says his new robot F, as he’s named her, is more elegant and approachable than his past creations.

(MORE: New Sprinting Humanoid Robot Will One Day Come with Flexible Arms and Tactile Skin)

The biggest difference between Ishiguro’s copy of himself and F are the number of actuators, or motor-like mechanisms, that control behaviors. Geminoid HI-1 boasts about 50, while F has only 12. This has dropped the cost from more than $1 million to $110,000, which Ishiguro hopes will help popularize the product. Scientists were able to simulate human-like behaviors using electronic signals in the robot’s built-in computer. The robotic twin can smile, frown and furrow her eyebrows, but most of the time the silicone-skinned clone just looks a little dazed.

Breaking-chains 1


I found the information on “QUO WARRANTO” on TEAM LAW

Charges using QUO WARRANTO has been brought against Obama, however, Congress seated him anyway, now they into Phase III, which is explained directly below this, I am also posting the information from CALL TO ACTION Phase III, scroll down for that information of what is be done now.  Time is very important, so please do this asap.  I hope we can move fast enough!  God Bless us and our Republic!

As of Monday, December 24, 2012, Phase 1 of a “Call to Action” began; when such letter was delivered to the AG and such an action was brought against Barrack Obama as President Elect contesting that he does not qualify for the office of President because he is not “a natural born Citizen”.  Respectively, Phase II began with a letter writing campaign wherein all of Congress was notified of that action; however, when Congress seated Obama in spite of the fact that Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” Phase III—“Operation Clean Sweep” began.  For more information, and to learn how you can help, click this link: “Call to Action”.  I have also gone to :  CALL TO ACTION and listed the information at the bottom of this message. 

Quo Warranto

Though the Latin phrase: “Quo Warranto” means: “By what authority”, it is also the title of one of the most ancient and important original styles of remedial court actions inherent to any sovereign; including (but not limited to) each of the people in the United States.  It is the ultimate means the people have to limit officials to acting within the confines of the authority lawfully provided them through their office.  Quo Warranto is generally executed through a writ or related court order.

Because all authority in government collectively comes from the individual sovereign people, any of the people, can always use a properly executed quo warranto action to remove any official from office; if said official violates the privileges of their official capacity by acting outside of the lawful bounds of their authority and/or fails to perform the required responsibilities of that office.  Respectively, the government cannot lawfully interfere with the right to quo warranto; accordingly, the inherent right is irrevocable, ongoing and cannot be lawfully obviated by any legislative act.

Thus, where all authority in government comes from the people, Quo Warranto remains a right retained by the people to ask, “By what authority”; and, the respective Writ of Quo Warranto is the remedial instrument used by the courts to remove any official from office when that official is, through quo warranto, found to have violated the privilege of that office by acting absent of or in contradiction to the authority of that office.

In the United States, the right, with its respective Writ, are reserved to the people through the 9th and 10th amendments.

Quo Warranto can be used to ask any of the following three questions regarding anyone holding any office:

  1. Did the officer acquire the office unlawfully?

  2. Did the officer fail to do anything the office required them to do?

  3. Did the officer do anything forbidden from them while in the office?

If the answer to any of those questions is, “Yes”, Quo Warranto applies; and, the court must issue the Writ of Quo Warranto; which removes the officer from the office.

Here is how a Quo Warranto action works to secure its remedy:

First, except in rare occasions, the action is always brought by the government; thus, when any official commits any act forbidden to his office, or fails to act as required by his office, any of the people can write a letter to the Attorney General (hereinafter, “AG”) [in some cases the District Attorney is appropriate] showing cause for the Quo Warranto action and requesting that the AG bring the action to secure a Writ of Quo Warranto against the officer.  Also, if the unlawful action in question personally aggrieved or injured a party that party can bring the action directly into the court by their own right as a personally aggrieved/injured party.

Second, the AG either brings the action requested or declines the request.

If the AG declines, either overtly or by tacit admission (by failing to act (bring the action in court) within a fortnight), the right to proceed with the action in court as an independent prosecutor for the AG’s office (with the AG’s full authority to prosecute the case) automatically passes to the party that made the request for action to the AG.

Third, the aggrieved party or the government [through the AG, an assistant AG or a special prosecutor for the AG’s office] files the action in court where the case must be given the top priority of the court (taking precedence over all other actions).

Forth, the Defendant (officer in question) is summoned to appear in court, usually within five days, where the Defendant must prove their authority to so act in the office in question.

Fifth, if the defendant fails to provide evidence at trial proving lawful authority for the action in question (i.e.: the answer to the questions above are, “No”), Quo Warranto applies and the judge has no choice but to issue the Writ of Quo Warranto, which ousts the defendant from office.  This is an important point; though the judge reviews the facts to determine whether the answer to any of the three questions was, ’Yes’, if “yes”, the judge has no choice; but, to apply the remedy by issuing the Writ that removes the officer from the office.

The court has no jurisdiction to determine either what the remedy will be or whether the remedy should be applied; they can only determine the answer to the questions, and if “yes” is the answer to any of the questions, execute the remedy; to fail to do so would make the judge subject to a Quo Warranto action.  You may notice that the right to Habeas Corpus is a lesser subset of the right to Quo Warranto.

As of Monday, December 24, 2012, Phase 1 of a “Call to Action” began; when such letter was delivered to the AG and such an action was brought against Barrack Obama as President Elect contesting that he does not qualify for the office of President because he is not “a natural born Citizen”.  Respectively, Phase II began with a letter writing campaign wherein all of Congress was notified of that action; however, when Congress seated Obama in spite of the fact that Obama is not a “natural born Citizen”

Phase III—“Operation Clean Sweep” began.  For more information, and to learn how you can help, click this link: “Call to Action”.

‘Call to Action, Phase III’

Postby Admin » Thursday January 16th, 2014 12:38 pm GMT

Call to Action!
Phase III — Operation Clean Sweep
Inspire as many people as possible to review this message!

When officers of government violate the law, exceed the authority provided through the Constitution or fail to follow their primary responsibilities to the people, it falls to the people to hold those officers accountable. However, the people generally have no idea how they can possibly accomplish that necessary task to keep government operating within the limitations prescribed by the Constitution.

Respectively, we hope this article will help every American understand how to exercise that most important obligation to hold such officers accountable to the limitations of the law and inspire you to learn and use the law of Quo Warranto to save our nation (click on the blue underlined linked text to learn more about Quo Warranto).

Respectively, given that the Constitution requires that no person other than “a natural born Citizen” can ever be lawfully seated as President, when Barrack Øbama was allegedly elected to, and seated in, that office, two factors became self-evident:

  1. Given that the only condition wherein the natural birth of a person defines their citizenship is that condition where both parents are citizens of the same country; thus, by definition, “a natural born Citizen of the United States” can only be born of a mother and a father both of whom are citizens of the United States.

    • Wherefore, because Barrack Øbama’s father was never a United States citizen, Barrack Øbama cannot lawfully qualify for the office of President of the United States; and,

  2. Given that Congress seated President Øbama, each member of Congress violated at least two of the Constitution’s mandates:

    1. they failed to vet the President Elect’s qualification to serve prior to seating a President; and,

    2. they seated Barrack Øbama as President even though he cannot possibly lawfully qualify for the office.

Thus, the people’s right to demand “Proof of authority!” through Quo Warranto applies to each member of Congress for both of those violations.
Now, remember this: a Writ of Quo Warranto only allows one remedy in law for such a failure — oustal from office. Therefore, it is time for the people to timely hold Congress accountable!

To that end, Phase III timing is incredibly critical!!!
To make a “clean sweep” of Congress, the congressmen still in office, that were in office when President Øbama was so seated, must be charged with Quo Warranto! Therefore, you, the people from each Congressional District must individually raise those charges!

The sooner the better—time is of the essence.

The more people that act as soon as they receive this message, the better the Clean Sweep effect.

The beauty of such actions is the people’s individual right to compel the government to provide proof of authority (by requesting a Writ of Quo Warranto) is protected by the 9th Article of Amendment of the United States Constitution, etc.. Respectively, such actions are brought in accord with the laws of the State; not, D.C. rules! And, that means that, in accord with State law, if the AG does not accept the responsibility for bringing the respective actions, then the parties across the nation that request the same automatically possess the authority (should they choose to exercise it) of proceeding in the case as special prosecutors for the AG\’s Office with the full authority of the AG\’s office to so prosecute their respective case. Due to the nature of the Quo Warranto action in law, there is nothing the AG, or the Court, can do to lawfully impede that process.

However, you can rest assured that no one in the “government” will do anything to remedy the woes the people face in America today—they will only make things worse! If you haven’t noticed; they seem hell bent on destroying the economy and usurping dictatorial control over every aspect of life in America; even if it takes civil war! Therefore, if you want to save the nation and its economy from war while you keep food on the table and fuel in the tanks, it is up to you to act—by using the law to hold Congress accountable!

Because, all authority in government collectively comes from the individual people; and, ultimately, It remains the obligation of the individual people to learn and apply their inherent rights [through the proper application of law] to compel the errant officers to prove their authority for their actions; especially when the government fails to lawfully manage itself and stay within the bounds of our Constitution’s Law. The bottom line, it is up to you, the individual, to use the law of Quo Warranto to demand (through the AG) that the government provide a Writ of Quo Warranto for each such violator that was charged with authority from you—which violators are the Congressmen representing the Congressional District where you live.

There is no time to wait; therefore, do your part:

  1. Send your Request:

    The following is a sample copy of the Request for Quo Warranto Letter others have sent: Sample letter.

    Use the following combined methods of delivery to send your request for Quo Warranto Action to the Attorney General:

    1. Most importantly, send a physical letter by certified mail with return receipt requested (see: content notarized mail).; and,

    2. Fax [with Cover Sheet] to: (301) 341-0779.

    Send each of the above to the U.S. Attorney General himself, Eric H. Holder, Jr., requesting that he institute a Quo Warranto action against each of the members of Congress from the congressional district where you live.
    You must remember; when using such a sample letter, you will need to at least change all of the yellow highlighted text to the appropriate information related to the specific congressional district (find your Members of Congress here) and federal district court in your area (find your district court here) before you send any such fax, e-mail or letter!

  2. Then, Report your action:

    Send Admin a private message telling us what Congressional District you referenced in your Quo Warranto request letter to the AG; that will help us track which congressional districts still need to find someone to send such requests to the AG. The bottom line: we need your feedback so we can know how well Operation Clean Sweep is working.

  3. Spread the word:

    1. Follow us on Twitter and refer others to do the same; and/or,

    2. Like us on Facebook; share Team Law’s comments on your wall and refer others to do the same; and/or,

    3. Refer people to this article on our forum; the way we like to do that is by simply directing people to and telling them to follow the “Call to Action” link in the headline of the article on that page;

    4. Copy this Sample e-mail message and send it as e-mail to everyone with whom you regularly communicate via e-mail.

This may be the most important thing that has happened in our lifetimes! Never before have the following key elements existed:

  1. A private people controlled social networking system that spans the globe in mere moments giving the people the power to unite on a cause virtually instantaneously;

  2. A man that is not a natural born Citizen was seated as the President of the United States in clear violation of the Constitutions mandate that Congress can never allow such a thing to happen; and,

  3. Respectively, every member of Congress is subject to removal from office via a Writ of Quo Warranto.

Of course, such a social network automatically becomes the place where people vent their frustration with just about everything you can think of; and, that means the opportunity to help people unite as they learn how to remedy such frustrations is available to us all—right now!

So, let’s get together and do it—follow the steps provided above. Act now, support this Call to Action.

If you have any questions or you want to know more about this effort you may:

  1. Join us for our daily Conference Call;

  2. Post them on our “Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 3” page;

  3. Click the following link to contact Team Law’s Trustee via private message and let him know of your interest; or,

  4. Use the information found on the “Contacting Team Law” page to call us.

Please note: throughout Team Law’s forum system, underlined blue text is linked to related content—for example:if you click on the following blue underlined text: Contact Team Law, a new browser tab will open related to that link.
Remember, to share this Call to Action with everyone you know; and, if for some reason you can\’t file an action against your congressmen, send donations to support our work to support those that can.

Team Law,

“In memory of our God, our faith, and freedom,
and of our spouses, our children, and our peace.”

PAN member’s showdown with Facebook

I’ve made enough anti-Facebook posts here, so people who like this blog know where I stand with them.  YouTube, in particular has similar biases; Christian and Conservative sites are deleted for “continuing copyright” or other Y.T. supposed rules violations.

This is just one response to a recent ban of Gerry Emery, a PAN member and Second Amendment rights ally, by Facebook; for running an article which contained an image stating that gun control helped make the Holocaust possible.

Too (omitted) bad for them!  As far as that goes, IBM’s technology helped make Hitler’s “final solution” possible.

Here is my version of “gun control”:

2nd A gun control-Ver 2

In any event, Kit Daniels, of Info  posted this in his defense:

Facebook Bans Gun Owners, Allows Kitten Torture Video

Uploading burning kitten video won’t get you banned, but talking about guns will










by Kit Daniels | | September 9, 2014

Facebook has no problem with a kitten torture video on its site, but when Facebook users talk about guns, the social media giant will censor them with zeal.

Recently a video was posted on Facebook showing two men lighting a helpless kitten in a bucket on fire, but after multiple users flagged the video, Facebook told them it “doesn’t violate our Community Standards.”

“I was going through Facebook and I saw this video,” user Kieran Dunwel told the Daily Mail. “I clicked on it, watched it and I was disgusted.”

“I reported it to Facebook, it took five or six hours for them to get back to me, and they said it was perfectly fine to have it on there.”

However, when users attempt to talk about guns or post pictures of firearms, Facebook hits them with “Community Standards” violations.

A few days ago, gun rights activist Gerry Emery was banned from Facebook after sharing an article explaining the ways in which Connecticut’s gun ban is worse than Hitler’s gun ban.

Facebook said Emery’s post, which also included an image stating that gun control helped make the Holocaust possible, “doesn’t follow Facebook Community Standards.”

“You’re temporarily blocked from posting,” Facebook told Emery. “This temporary block will last 30 days, and you won’t be able to post on Facebook until it’s finished.”

“You’ve repeatedly posted things that aren’t allowed on Facebook. Read the Facebook Community Standards to learn what kinds of posts aren’t allowed.”

Similarly, last year Facebook deactivated the page of a Pennsylvania gun store without warning after the store’s owner announced his intent to raffle off an AR-15.

“Our Ad Guidelines prohibit promotion of the sale of weapons and the Ad Guidelines apply to Pages with commercial content on them,” a Facebook spokesman told Vocativ. “Ads may not promote the sale or use of weapons, ammunition, or explosives.”

Facebook even expanded this policy back in March by preventing users under 18 from seeing the official pages of gun shops, effectively placing gun-related content in the same category as porn.

So basically, Facebook has no problem with users sharing a video of a kitten meowing in agony while in flames, but sharing an image of a Remington 700 mounted on a Harris bipod could get them banned.

This hypocrisy is a microcosm of gun control; despite what anti-gun advocates suggest, gun control is not meant to stop violence but rather it’s meant to restrict rights.

Received this e-mail from Michele Bachmann:

It is hard to believe but right now there are Americans, with United States passports, overseas in Iraq and Syria, fighting side by side with ISIS and other terrorist group Jihadists.

Earlier this week I introduced a bill that would revoke the passports for these Americans and begin the process of revoking their United States citizenship.

click here to sign the petition If you agree that we cannot sit back and allow United States citizens to fight for ISIS, and then return to U.S. soil, possibly with the intention of creating a horrific terrorist strike here, then I hope you will add your name to my Join ISIS — Lose Your Passport petition right now, so American-born ISIS fighters cannot return to America.

Currently, Americans fighting with terrorists abroad are allowed free access to re-enter the United States, as some already have! They are likely put on a terror watch list and have to go through SOME screening, but that’s it!

Will you join me in putting an end to this freedom of return? Add your name to my Join ISIS — Lose Your Passport petition right now.

The bill I introduced states that if someone has joined with a radical Islamic terrorist Jihadist state, then they will lose their passport, begin the process of losing their United States citizenship, and will not be allowed to re-enter the United States.

We have to do this to protect ourselves. This is common sense. We cannot allow these American Islamic terrorist fighters to come back into our country and have the opportunity of creating a terrorist attack right here.

Please let me know if you stand with me. Add your name today.

Michele Bachmann

P.S. After you sign your name I hope you will forward this email to your friends and family. We must show the government that we have the support of thousands of freedom loving Americans.

Sign the Petition


13 years later- Is the 9/11 Official Story Crumbling at Free-Fall Speed?

A curious, and long-overdue, phenomenon has been occurring recently throughout alternative and mainstream media.  Perhaps it is because of the upcoming 9/11 anniversary, but I have noticed recently that there have been numerous articles and videos disputing the “official” story of 9/11.  Now, there has always been a huge number of Americans who had their doubts about the government’s account of the events of 9/11, but it seems to me that now, more than ever, the voices of those who question the government line about 9/11 is growing rapidly.  Moreover, those who have joined the rest of us calling for a new investigation are men and women of excellent repute; and, subsequently, much more difficult to label as a kook, or whatever derogatory remark that causes the masses to turn off their higher-brain function.

As stated, the amount of attention directed towards a possible cover-up of 9/11 has seemingly blown-up over the last 3 or 4 weeks.  Recently, it seems like each day that I scan the alternative media there is a new article or video exposing more of the obvious lie that accounts for the government’s story.  I have included links to much of the newly released information below.  You may have access to additional links, and, if so, I encourage you to share them.

  • Although considered fringe by those who hate liberty, Ron Paul still has a considerable following, and considerable influence.  Although Mr. Paul didn’t come out as strongly during his multiple runs at the White House, now he reveals his true thoughts on 9/11 in this article.

  • Richard Gage has been calling for a further investigation into the events of 9/11 for some time now.  His organization, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, has done most excellent work since those tragic events which re-shaped our nation.  Now, along with over 2200 Architects and Engineers and almost 20,000 other supporters, former NSA Official, William Binney has signed the petition calling for a new investigation of 9/11.  Mr. Binney will now likely be labeled a kook, but his record seems to be impeccable.  You can hear Mr. Binney in his own words by watching the video below.

Richard Gage and A&E for 9/11 Truth are not yet done with their educational campaign.  On the contrary, as, starting today, they will be displaying a giant video billboard in Times Square focusing on the destruction of Building 7; which was never struck by a plane.  You can witness Building 7 crumble into its own footprint by watching the following video.

As one may suspect, I’m not a fan of Rosie O’ Donnell’s politics, in general, and certainly not a fan of her duplicitous stance on the Second Amendment, specifically; which is illustrated below in an article from The Liberty Professor.

Rosie O’Donnell is another example. On more than one occasion she has pushed an anti-gun agenda, even going so far as to propose that gun owners should be imprisoned. Yet she enjoys the protection of armed bodyguards and pushed to get permission for an armed bodyguard to accompany her children to school.

That being said, Ms. O’Donnell has been on the right side of 9/11 truth for a very long time.  Recently, she tweeted her doubts about the government’s account of events seen here.

Former mainstream journalist, Ben Swann has rightly gained much traction in the sphere of alternative media with his excellent reportage’. The fact that Mr. Swann lived on the other side of the media fence for roughly 14 years gives him a unique perspective on world events.  Recently, he published an article on his website posing 6 questions for 9/11.  Although Ben Swann is no longer considered mainstream, he’s pretty darn close.

To this point, much of the previous information has been linked back to alternative news sources.  However, even mainstream publications are beginning to question the events surrounding 9/11.  As seen below, at least 2 liberal media publications have pointed out what all of us in the Alternative Media have already know…  Something doesn’t add up with the “official” story.

In an article published by The New Yorker, author Lawrence Wright poses the question as to the whereabouts of the 28 page document which would shine a much brighter light on the true events surrounding 9/11.  The documents are being kept classified in order to not embarrass the Bush Family.  And, not to be outdone, the Fresno Bee published a bombshell editorial by Randy Shahbazian entitled, I don’t believe official 9/11 story.

Have we in Alternative Media done enough to educate the masses about the true events surrounding 9/11?  I would say, no, because I doubt any of us know what really happened that fateful day in September.  What we do know, I would humbly suggest, is that what we are being told is a lie.  And, based upon the recent media blitz for 9/11 truth, we are gaining many fine converts.



X HERE:  I have long held views that were met by hostility or disbelief.

Here is an excerpt from a PDF I have by Bill Lear:




JOHN LEAR, of full age, being duly sworn, deposes and says:


1. I am 65 years of age, a retired airline captain and former CIA pilot with over 19,000 hours of flight time, over 11,000 of which are in command of 3 or 4 engine jet transports, have flown over 100 different types

of aircraft in 60 different countries around the world. I retired in 2001 after 40 years of flying.

2. I am the son of Learjet inventor, Bill Lear, and hold more FAA airman certificates than any other FAA certificated airman. These include the Airline Transport Pilot certificate with 23 type ratings, Flight Instructor, Flight Engineer, Flight Navigator, Ground Instructor, Aircraft Dispatcher, Control Tower Operator and Parachute Rigger.

3. I flew secret missions for the CIA in Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Africa between 1967 and 1983.

4. During the last 17 years of my career I worked for several passenger and cargo airlines as Captain, Check Airman and Instructor. I was certificated by the FAA as a North Atlantic (MNPS) Check Airman. I have extensive experience as command pilot and instructor in the Boeing 707, Douglas DC-8 and Lockheed L-1011.

5. I checked out as Captain on a Boeing 707 in 1973 and Captain on the Lockheed L-1011 in 1985.

6. I hold 17 world records including Speed Around the World in a Lear Jet Model 24 set in 1966 and was presented the PATCO (Professional Air Traffic Controller’s Association) award for Outstanding Airmanship in 1968. I am a Senior Vice-Commander of the China Post 1, the American Legions Post for “Soldiers of Fortune”, a 24 year member of the Special Operations Association and member of

7. I have 4 daughters, 3 grandchildren and live with my wife of 37 years, Las Vegas business woman Marilee Lear in Las Vegas, Nevada.


8. No Boeing 767 airliners hit the Twin Towers as fraudulently alleged by the government, media, NIST and its contractors. Such crashes did not occur because they are physically impossible as depicted for the following reasons:

A. In the case of UAL 175 going into the south tower, a real Boeing 767 would have begun ‘telescoping’ when the nose hit the 14 inch steel columns which are 39 inches on center. The vertical and horizontal tail would have instantaneously separated from the aircraft, hit the steel box columns and fallen to the ground.

B. The engines when impacting the steel columns would have maintained their general shape and either fallen to the ground or been recovered in the debris of the collapsed building. One alleged engine part was found on Murray Street but there should be three other engine cores weighing over 9000 pounds each. Normal operating temperatures for these engines are 650°C so they could not possibly have burned up. This is a photo of a similar sized engine from a McDonnell-Douglas MD-11 which impacted the ocean at a high rate of speed. You can see that the engine remains generally intact.(photo, shtml)

C. When and if the nose of an airplane came in contact with the buildings 14 inch by 14 inch steel box columns and then, 37 feet beyond, the steel box columns of the building core the momentum of the wings would have slowed drastically depriving them of the energy to penetrate the exterior steel box columns. The spars of the wing, which extend outward, could not possibly have penetrated the 14 inch by 14 inch steel box columns placed 39 inches on center and would have crashed to the ground.

D. The argument that the energy of the mass of the Boeing 767 at a speed of 540 mph fails because:

a. No Boeing 767 could attain that speed at 1000 feet above sea level because of parasite drag which doubles with velocity and parasite power which cubes with velocity.

b. The fan portion of the engine is not designed to accept the volume of dense air at that altitude and speed.

E. The piece of alleged external fuselage containing 3 or 4 window cutouts is inconsistent with an airplane that hit 14 inch steel box columns, placed 39 inches in center, at over 500 mph.

This fuselage section would be telescopically crumpled had it actually penetrated the building as depicted in the CNN video. It is impossible for it to have then re-emerged from the building and then fallen intact and unburned as depicted.

F. The Purdue video fails because no significant part of the Boeing 767 or engine thereon could have penetrated the 14 inch steel columns and 37 feet beyond the massive core of the tower without part of it falling to the ground. The Purdue video misrepresents the construction of the core of the building and depicts unidentified parts of the airplane snapping the core columns which were 12″x36″. The Purdue video also misrepresents what would happen to the tail when the alleged fuselage contacted the core. The tail would instantaneously separate from the empennage (aft fuselage). Further, the Purdue video misrepresents, indeed it fails to show, the wing box or center section of the wing in the collision with the core. The wing box is a very strong unit designed to hold the wings together and is an integral portion of the fuselage. The wing box is designed to help distribute the loads of the wings up-and-down flexing in flight.

G. My analysis of the alleged cutout made by the Boeing 767 shows that many of the 14-inch exterior steel box columns which are shown as severed horizontally, do not match up with the position of the wings. Further, several of the columns through which the horizontal tail allegedly disappeared are not severed or broken. In addition, the wing tips of the Boeing 767 being of less robust construction than the inner portions of the wings could not possibly have made the cookie-cutter pattern as shown in the aftermath photos. The wing tips would have been stopped by the 14 inch steel box columns and fallen to the ground.

H. The debris of the Boeing 767, as found after the collapse, was not consistent with actual debris had there really been a crash. Massive forgings, spars from both the wing and horizontal and vertical stabilizers, landing gear retract cylinders, landing gear struts, hydraulic reservoirs and bogeys oxygen bottles, a massive keel beam, bulkheads and the wing box itself cold not possibly have ‘evaporated’ even in a high intensity fire. The debris of the collapse should have contained massive sections of the Boeing 767, including 3 engine cores weighing approximately 9000 pounds apiece which could not have been hidden. Yet there is no evidence of any of these massive structural components from either 767 at the WTC. Such complete disappearance of 767s is impossible.


9. My opinion, based on extensive flight experience both as captain and instructor in large 3 and 4 engine aircraft is that it would have been impossible for an alleged hijacker with little or no time in the Boeing 767 to have taken over, then flown a Boeing 767 at high speed, descending to below 1000 feet above mean sea level and flown a course to impact the twin towers at high speed for these reasons:

[am unable to upload the full PDF; unless I had the paid upgrade to Adobe. Here is an online source for the full Lear affidavit: ]

This from an old post:

Expert Who Concluded WTC 7 Was A Controlled Demolition Killed In Car Accident

Posted (9-20-2011) by CRY AND HOWL

Bitter medicine – Every time I have expressed the opinion that the WTC was set up; I’ve been called things I’ll not repeat here.

I maintained the closeup shots of the buildings pancaking straight down, without any damage to surrounding structures, was too much like controlled demolition; used to get rid of old, or condemned bulidings. Here is a blog from “CRY AND HOWL” A conservative blog, folks:

Danny Jowenko, who was an expert in controlled building demolition …

… after being shown the footage of WTC 7 collapsing Jowenko stated “This is a controlled demolition carried out by a team of experts.”

At the time Jowenko did not know that he was watching footage from September 11th 2001 and responded in disbelief when the reporters explained what the footage was.

You can see in the following video the shock on Mr. Jowenko’s face when he found out this was footage from 9/11:


Persistance – “We all toughed it out”

First, a bit of humor; this is one of my favorite things:

Now, the entrée:

Getty Images

“If you are going through hell, keep going.” —Winston Churchill

I like Churchill; he persevered in the face of adversity.

It’s likely that most of the people here achieved far more financially in their lives than I have.

I’m not getting out a “crying towel”, merely that while I continually tried to improve myself, I have just “toughed it out” without being able to realize most of the goals I wanted to achieve.

I’ve been accused of being too stubborn; however, that word can be equated to persistence;  you need to be persistent, and not give up at the first failed attempt in your endeavors.  Life is boot camp, not “club med”.  When I take the stance that “optimists never got off the prosaic”, it’s because I worked to get what I had; nobody paved my way, and my so-called finances were only enough to keep going. I don’t resent others success. 

Today, I found a Yahoo item on “What 13 successful people do before going to bed”, a bit weird to me; but I clicked on it out of curiosity.

The only common thread I had with any of the people referenced is that I’m more of a “night owl” than a “lark”.

Most keep late hours, night having less distractions. (no phone calls, no interruptions, nobody trying to reach them).

A few of them, (Obama, and the very superstitious Stephen King) I could do without.

However, Winston Churchill, Bill Gates, and founding father Ben Franklin were among others in the list.

Another item crosslinked with this was101 Inspirational Quotes From Super Successful People” here are a few of those quotes:

“Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning.” —Albert Einstein

“Once you choose hope, anything’s possible.” —Christopher Reeve

“It often requires more courage to dare to do right than to fear to do wrong.” —Abraham Lincoln

“I have not failed. I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work.” —Thomas A. Edison

“A dream doesn’t become reality through magic; it takes sweat, determination and hard work.” —Colin Powell

Don’t ralph; this B*****d  always was a good talker:

“Change will not come if we wait for some other person or some other time. We are the ones we’ve been waiting for. We are the change that we seek.” —Barack Obama 

I omit other quotes from certain other Libtards  like Hillary Clinton, among the list.


The many attacks we are fighting will only get more intense; one of my hottest buttons, illegal immigration, stems from growing up in Arizona – long before the invasion.

I had to hunt for this item; a song by Michael Murphy, on a 1975 release:

Michael Murphy - Desert Rat

The refrain from this song is one that stuck with me all these years later:

“Goodbye old desert rat, you half crazy wildcat, you knew where it was at,

what life’s all about; you savor a catalogue, king of the prairie dogs, success is survival,

and you toughed it out; you toughed it out.”


From Patriot Action Network

How To Understand Liberalese

Posted by Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer Admin II on August 29, 2014



Have you ever listened to a Liberal and wondered “Why am I listening to this inane, banal, moronic, Marxist pile of excrement?”

Have you ever talked to a Liberal for, oh, 3 to 5 seconds and got a splitting migraine?

Have you ever wondered how Democrats are smart enough to think up all the lies they tell?

Then THIS is for YOU-

E8Link courtesy of Governmental Deception -

Fasten Your Seatbelts – The next set of dominoes to fall will make 2008 look like a Boy Scout!

This is very peculiar.  Governmental Deception started following my WP blog.  I visited that site, which contained a posting from entitled  “Voice of Russia Interviews LaRouche: There Has To Be A NEW ‘World Order”. 

Naturally, this was a red flag to me; I don’t know squat about this LaRouche character.  I  clicked on the link to that site to read the entire article.

LaRouche claims to be a Patriot. Fat chance, I’m thinking. His statements irked me. Further perusal of this site revealed this item:

A Warning About the Exploding Derivatives Markets

The subject matter was exactly what I’ve been thinking all along: We’ve learned NOTHING from the 2008 collapse! The Bankers and the FED are acting like “business as usual”; the financial “house of cards” has been stacked ever higher, with more at risk than before, and much more precarious. Here is the article:


A Warning About the Exploding Derivatives Markets

August 21, 2014 • 9:38AM

“We’ve reformed nothing. We have more leverage and more derivatives risk than we’ve ever had,” reports an analyst for a structured finance broker-dealer, speaking of the latest bubbles in the global, unregulated, over-the-counter derivatives markets, to the Aug. 20 Financial Times.

On Tuesday it was 15 members of Congress confronting the Federal Reserve on the fact that it was still making rules allowing it to bail out big, bankrupt banks with trillions in liquidity injections, to keep them going as zombies. Today the Financial Times is warning that exotic credit derivatives are again exploding in volume, which can turn completely toxic to financial institutions in case of market volatility, a disease that could be called “AIG syndrome.” The Financial Times begins by citing a warning on this from Kyle Bass, founder of the Dallas hedge fund Hayman Capital Management, who published the first detailed warning, back in early 2007, that credit derivatives would bring down the banking system.

The FT‘s story is that Wall Street banks are piling into the issuance of extremely complex credit derivatives which are bets on entire global securities and credit markets — total return swaps — or bets on indices of credit default swaps, known as swaptions. JPMorgan Chase’s London Whale team lost $6 billion on these, so they’re not for sophisticated investors any more than for unsophisticated ones, but the fees make them very profitable for banks issuing them. The leaders, though not named in the FT article, are Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and … JPMorgan Chase.

Taking the swaptions, for example, $60 billion of them are now being traded every week. The proliferation is due to a trans-Atlantic credit market situation of very low interest rates — forced by the central banks — and virtually no market volatility, because of the huge amounts of liquidity being pumped in by the central banks, most of it seeking exactly the same high-yield, high-risk securities.

“The markets don’t really need a Lehman or even a Lehman-lite event for a credit dislocation,” a hedge fund manager is quoted. “You just need spreads to widen or rates to go up.”

Note – made in 1973, Soylent Green was Edward G. Robinson’s  last film before he died. He is Sol in this clip.

Factory Farmed Fish: A Health and Sustainability Red Herring?

  • By Hannah Bewsey
    Organic Consumers Association, August 21, 2014

For related articles and more information, please visit OCA’s Millions Against Monsanto page and our Fish Sustainability page.

Photo Credit: jenny downing via Compfight cc

Consumers are up in arms over plans by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration to approve the first genetically engineered fish—dubbed “frankenfish.” But what many consumers may not realize is that much of the non-GMO fish, especially farmed fish, in today’s supermarkets is equally detrimental to human health. It’s also harmful to the environment and economically unsustainable.

That’s not to say that all wild-caught fish is safe or sustainable. Nearly a third of the world’s fisheries are currently in collapse, “unable to regenerate their populations fast enough to keep pace with the rate at which they are being caught or killed, according to an interview, conducted by the Rodale Institute, with actor Ted Danson, author of <em. To help consumers navigate the waters of wild-caught fish, the Rodale Institute recommends consumers follow the Monterey Bay Aquarium’s “Seafood Watch” guide (also available as a downloadable smartphone app).

But GMO salmon, if approved, will be a farmed fish—and consumers should be aware that farmed fish in general should be avoided, even though there are some distinctions within the farmed fish market.

Fish farming isn’t new.

Fish farming, in the form of cages, nets, and enclosures submerged in marine or fresh water, dates as far back as ancient China. Today, an increased demand for the lean proteins and Omega-3 fatty acids contained in fish has helped make “aquaculture” the most rapidly growing animal industry. Just last year, farmed fish made up more than half of all global fish consumption, and even surpassed beef production. The number of wild-caught fish, meanwhile, has plateaued in recent years—in many cases due to over-fishing.

Proponents of aquaculture cite its high efficiency of protein production, reduced burdens on overfished natural stocks, and economic and environmental sustainability.

But the practice of fish farming isn’t quite as cut-and-dried as its proponents would have you believe. Here are some important facts to consider before purchasing farmed fish.

Farmed fish are stressed fish.

Contrary to popular wisdom, goldfish are unhappy in bowls. They just need more space to grow and flourish. The same is true of fish raised for human consumption. Unfortunately, farms that use the cage system tend to maintain fish in very high densities. The result is a stressed fish that is more susceptible to injury and disease.

To curb sickness and prevent the whole stock from becoming infected, farmed fish may be fed antibiotics and chemicals that remain in their systems until they make it to our tables. While the U.S. regulates certain antibiotics and pesticides, many common chemicals are not controlled. Imported fish, in particular, are suspect: the U.S. inspects just 2 percent of all imported seafood for drug residues.

Farmed fish are escape artists.

No matter how secure its enclosures, any large farming facility is bound to have escapees. While the fish may count themselves lucky, their escape is not so lucky for local ecosystems. Escaped fish, often larger than their wild counterparts, can out-compete local stocks for food and resources. If they breed with wild species, genetic differences in the farmed fish may lead to less fit offspring, thus further diminishing the wild stock. Worse yet, sick escaped fish can infect wild populations: A 2008 study showed that even low levels of sea lice in farmed fish cause reductions in local wild fish populations.

It’s a fish-eat-fish world.

While some farmed fish are satisfied with leafy greens, popular species like salmon and tuna are carnivorous, meaning that they are fed fish products derived from small species like anchovies or herring. Anywhere from two to five pounds of wild-caught fish may be required to produce a single pound of farm-raised fish. These numbers, of course, significantly challenge the sustainability claim of many fish farming advocates.

Even in the case where fish are fed soy or other animal products, there is no way for consumers to know what is in the farmed fish they are buying. Must a customer who has pledged to eat GMO-free abstain from all farmed fish, on the off chance it has been raised on GMO soy meal?

Fish make waste.

In addition to any antibiotics, pesticides or food remnants that are leaked from farmed fish enclosures, fishes’ natural waste products in concentrated amounts can negatively impact local ecosystems. Studies show that carbon, nitrogen and phosphate levels are all elevated within marine farming regions, and become accumulated in the ocean sediment. This nutrient-rich waste may lead to algal growth and water de-oxygenation sufficient to deplete local sea life in the immediate vicinity, further negating the sustainability myth.

Fish farms compete with local fishermen.

As the aquaculture industry grows, farmed fish become both cheaper and more prevalent. Naturally, the cheapest fish comes from the regions subject to fewer regulations—one of the reasons local farm-raised fish is perhaps a lesser evil than imported stocks. For the fishermen who normally catch these species, however, all fish farms are competition.

The fact that fish farms employ local workers is not necessarily a benefit, as much of this growth occurs outside the U.S. About 62 percent of all farmed fish, for example, come from China. Furthermore, the majority of fish farms are managed by large companies with a vested interest in keeping production costs low.

Individual fishermen, in contrast, have little say in the living conditions of their hauls. When you buy wild-caught fish, chances are you know where it comes from and you are contributing to your local economy.

Not all fish farms are created equal.

From Canadian salmon farms to Chinese carp farms, there is as much diversity to be found in the type of farm as the species of fish it produces. Fish farming is a business like any other, and it is up to individual producers to regulate their own operations. For example, the primary factor in the healthful fatty acid content of farmed fish is their diet. This is also a factor directly controlled by individual farmers.

Small local farms may raise fewer, and exclusively native fish, thus have a smaller impact on nearby ecosystems. They may also have a system for recycling certain waste products. Plants or shellfish that help filter nutrients are increasingly prevalent.

But ultimately wild fish provide a healthful meal with a lot fewer questions.

Additional seafood resources

For region-specific healthy seafood:

For wild-caught sustainability listings:

Hannah Bewsey is a researcher/writer for the Organic Consumers Association.

The Counter Jihad Report

News ~ Resources ~ Activism

Creeping Sharia

Documenting the Islamization of America

Digestible Politics

Politics Made Easy!

A Conservative Christian Man

Stand for Your Belief or it is Not a Belief but an Excuse



sharia unveiled

illuminating minds

We Moved > Go To:


Reality Check

American Patriot's Reality Check

The Conservative Citizen

No apologies - No Retreat - No surrender

Allen West Republic

Articulating American Principles & Values


How the hell did I get here?


Politics & News for Patriots, Conservatives, Libertarian Republicans and Ron Paul Lovers


People Healing People

Boudica BPI Weblog

Following in the spirit of Britain's Queen Boudica, Queen of the Iceni. A BPI site. I am an opinionator, do your own research, verification.

Rat Nation

exposing the lunacy of liberalism one post at a time

The Christian Gazette

Spreading The Gospel


Swiss Defence League



Freedom Is Just Another Word...

“Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty. The obedient must be slaves.”~Thoreau

Jericho777's Blog

Correcting Misinformation!

Rogue Government

Eternal Vigilance for Liberty

Energy Independence For States

Jobs and The Economy

Citizen Tom

Welcome to Conservative commentary and Christian prayers from Gainesville, Virginia. That's OUTSIDE the Beltway.

Armor of God

Attempting to obey God and follow Jesus Christ our Lord

Cry and Howl

Cease, my son, to hear the instruction that causeth to err from the words of knowledge. Proverbs 19:27

Gds44's Blog

"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not," warned Thomas Jefferson.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 165 other followers