Latest Entries »
This was posted by me here on Nov 9 2012. My job situation has changed, (better) however, what I said then about hyper inflation goes double now. I post this in regard to the effects of Apostasy in America, and the sad effect on the economy by this Regime’s “quantitative easing”.
We’re seeing the last vestiges of the America we knew, becoming part of the globalists scheme. I am a realist, not an optimist. We here as Patriots, who believe in Jehova God, -and are not tares- know full well what prophecy says about “this generation shall not pass”… I am not a “doomsayer” – I am merely a little guy, no home, no assets, nothing but a one bdrm apartment, and a subsistance wage job.
I’m including a link to Joseph Farah’s article on WND at the bottom of my commentary, which really says it all. Had we, as Conservatives put our foot down thirty years ago, and that cannot be emphasised enough, the demoralization of an entire generation, via the public school system, Atheists therein, and an increasingly socalist government would most likely have been thwarted. The following link:
http://partneringwitheagles.wordpress.com/2012/08/27/constitutionality-the-establishment-clause-atheism-discussed/ clearly shows how much Apostacy has contributed to our current situation. Given the percentages, (excerpt from above link):
The Canadian Ipsos Reid poll released September 12, 2011 entitled “Canadians Split On Whether Religion Does More Harm in the World than Good,” sampled 1,129 Canadian adults and came up 30% who do not believe in a god. Interestingly, the same poll found that 33% of respondents who identified themselves as Catholics and 28% Protestants said they didn’t believe in a god. Italics my emphasis – “X”
This of course, to those who believe, shows the percentage of tares among the above religious groups. Moreover, their numbers seem to be increasing, not just in Canada, but worldwide.
We are indeed in a battle for Americas very soul.
Mr. Farah mentions 2 Chronicles 7:14: “If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.”
I shudder to think – Exactly how many of us now fit this category in America?
Many “twenty-somethings” do know what’s going on, and are appalled by their peers having bought into Obama’s con game, but they, like us, seem to be a minority.
I just read a blog on an article with a link to CNSnews.com, where Harry Reid (GAG)… well read it for yourself:
CNSNews.com) – Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said on Wednesday that if the $16.394 trillion current legal limit on the federal government’s debt must be raised in the next few months by another $2.4 trillion, “We’ll raise it.”
That would set the debt limit at $18.794 trillion. http://cnsnews.com/news/article/harry-reid-hiking-debt-limit-18794t-we-ll-raise-it
The steers in Congress have caved to an increase each time before; each time we do this, the road back to financial stability gets more and more difficult, if not impossible. Looking at this straight in the eye, this Patriot thinks we have reached the point of no return. Even IF they take the bull by the horns, and enforce a halt to spending, the road ahead will be just as rough as the last four years. It took thirty plus years of negligence to get us here; it won’t get solved overnight.
I do not see this happening. One more raising of the debt limit, and I sincerely think that the hyperinflation experienced by the Weimar Republic, will at some point thereafter, be experienced here. We have never in our history faced a more grave situation.
Here is a bit of History – After our ’29 crash we called in loans made to prop up their republic after WWI: [URLhttp://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/weimar_depression_1929.htm]
EXCERPT:“After the Wall Street Crash, America gave Germany 90 days to start to re-pay money loaned to her. No other world power had the money to give Germany cash injections. Britain and France were still recovering from the First World War and the Wall Street Crash was to have an impact on industrial Britain. Stalin’s Russia was still in a desperate state and embarking on the 5 year plans. Therefore, an impoverished Weimar Germany could only call on America for help and she was effectively bankrupt by the end of 1929 and quite incapable of lending money. Companies throughout Germany – though primarily in the industrial zones such as the Ruhr – went bankrupt and workers were laid off in their millions.
Unemployment affected nearly every German family just 6 years after the last major economic disaster – hyperinflation- had hit Weimar.”
September 1928 650,000 unemployed
September 1929 1,320,000 unemployed
September 1930 3,000,000 unemployed
September 1931 4,350,000 unemployed
September 1932 5,102,000 unemployed
January 1933 6,100,000 unemployed
Need I “prophecy” about America? I dare not. I’ll just say one thing – Who is holding billions of American debt? HERE is Mr Farah’s blog:It’s time for cultural counter-revolutionhttp://www.wnd.com/2012/11/its-time-for-cultural-counter-revolution/
Years ago, I lost a good friend; he had a heart attack while golfing. This Cancer is taking yet another vacation in Hawaii, and plans to go golfing there. Hmmm… Please, God.
From PATRIOT UPDATE:
Obama Orchestrating Regime Change in Israel
Monday, December 15, 2014
President Obama’s toxic foreign policy consists mainly of placating America’s adversaries and manipulating our friends (that and combatting the imminent threat of global warming with a one-sided American policy of economic seppuku). Now we are learning of Obama’s latest reach into what has always been the ken of agencies like the CIA: regime change. Only this isn’t to topple Communism in Central America or extremists in Tehran. It’s to overthrow Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu in our middle-east ally Israel.
Aaron Klein wrote in the Jerusalem Post,
The White House has singled out Netanyahu as standing in the way of Obama’s utopian vision for a new Middle East and Persian Gulf. What better way to bypass this obstacle than aiding in Netanyahu’s removal from office?
Last week, Netanyahu’s fragile coalition finally fractured, with both Finance Minister Yair Lapid and Justice Minister Tzipi Livni, dismissed, and Netanyahu’s dissolving of the Knesset (Israeli parliament) with new elections to be scheduled. This will be Netanyahu’s greatest internal challenge, and Klein contents that it was in no small part brought about by the Obama administration’s meddling in Israeli politics.
His points are convincing.
Last October, Netanyahu’s Defense Minister Ya’alon was denied a meeting with Vice President Joe Biden, Secretary of State Sen. John Kerry (D-MA)0%, and National Security Adviser (and national stunt double) Susan rice during his visit to Washington. This basically never happens.
Ha’aretz reported that prior to a meeting between Obama and Netanyahu last October, a classified discussion was held “about possibly taking more proactive measures against the “settlements,” including mulling sanctions or punishing Israel at the United Nations.”
Following the meeting, both the State Department and the White House released almost identical statements condemning new construction in East Jerusalem. Netanyahu’s political adversaries jumped right in, as if on cue, criticizing him in Israel.
Jeffrey Goldberg’s hit-piece in October described senior Obama officials as calling Netanyahu a “chickenshit” on the Palestinian peace process. This was framed as a crisis in The Atlantic article, and also by Israeli Finance Minister Yair Lapid, a Netanyahu opponent who is part of the now-sunk coalition.
The only “refugees” the US should be bringing in are Christians and other religious minorities who are being oppressed, ethnically cleansed and murdered in Syria, Iraq and other Muslim countries under Islamic rule.
But Obama has long abandoned religious minorities under Islamic rule.
Instead, Obama continues to import jihad. The consequences of Muslim immigration on free societies is ruinous.
The UN decides who is a “refugee” under the “Refugee Resettlement Program.” UNHCR decides, and the UN is driven by the largest world body — the OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation), whose goal is to impose Islam across the world. And they are doing it — with money, media, men and ….. Obama.
This is more than just another of those moments that warily conservatives point to when President Barack Obama or his defenders insist that no administration has operated stricter border controls or pursued more deportations of illegal immigrants. This is criminal.
According to a damning report in The New York Times, the White House recently overturned a ban on allowing a wealthy Ecuadorean woman from entering the United States after her family donated tens of thousands of dollars to Democrats.
“The woman, Estefanía Isaías, had been barred from coming to the United States after being caught fraudulently obtaining visas for her maids,” The Times reported. “But the ban was lifted at the request of the State Department under former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton so that Ms. Isaías could work for an Obama fund-raiser with close ties to the administration.”
Birthright Citizenship is the practice of granting automatic citizenship to children born in the United States. Under current federal law, nearly all children born in the U.S. receive automatic citizenship, regardless of whether their parents are lawfully in the country. This practice has created a magnet for foreign nationals who want their children to have U.S. citizenship and spawned creation of a cottage industry devoted to helping pregnant “tourists” illicitly enter this country for the purpose of giving birth.
In 2010, “there were 4.5 million U.S.-born children whose parents were unauthorized [illegal],” according to the Pew Hispanic Center (Pew Hispanic Research Trends Project, “A Nation of Immigrants: A Portion of the 40 Million, Including 11 Million Unauthorized,” Pew Hispanic Center, Jan. 29, 2013.) The Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) has estimated that nearly 200,000 children are born annually “to foreign women admitted as visitors, that is, tourists, students, guest workers, and other non-immigrant categories.”
Eight percent of all U.S. births (approximately 350,000 a year) come from at least one illegal-alien parent, according to the Pew Hispanic Center.
There is also a national-security component to the issue, as illustrated by the case of one child in this category: Anwar al-Awlaki, the American-born cleric who became one of al-Qaeda’s top operational planners of terrorism.
Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) has introduced H.R.140, the Birthright Citizenship Act, which would end the practice by requiring that at least one of the child’s parents be a U.S. citizen or legal permanent resident. Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) has introduced a companion bill in the Senate, S.301.
The Immigration and Nationality Act defines Birthright Citizenship in the United States, but there is also a clause in the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. While the Supreme Court has interpreted the latter Birthright Citizenship clause as it applies to legal immigrants, it has never done so with regard to illegal aliens.
The United States and Canada are the only developed nations that grant automatic citizenship so expansively to children born within their borders. Anyone born in the United States is considered an American citizen regardless of whether the parents are U.S. citizens, legal residents, temporary visitors, or illegal aliens in the U.S. (Here is a more detailed country-by-country list of the status of national laws regarding birthright citizenship.) Automatic citizenship is granted according to federal statute, not the 14th Amendment, so critics of the policy argue that this could be reformed by changing or repealing the statute outright.
Veteran legal scholar John Eastman believes that Members of Congress who passed the 14th Amendment never intended that it include Birthright Citizenship in its current form. Eastman points to the wording of the 1866 Civil Rights Act as providing the key to the meaning of the 14th Amendment and the intent of the Framers.
The act provides that “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States.” This formulation makes clear, Eastman writes, that any child born on U.S. soil to parents who were temporary visitors to this country and remained a citizen or subject of the parents’ home country “was not entitled to claim the birthright citizenship provided by the 1866 Act.”
But for now, the constitutional meaning of the amendment as it applies to illegal immigrants will remain uncertain until the Supreme Court interprets it.
The expansive interpretation of the 14th Amendment currently in effect has potentially troubling national-security implications. In a CIS backgrounder, a retired government employee with extensive national security experience, points to Anwar al-Awlaki — a terrorist with links to jihadists including Umar Farouk Abdulmutullab, who attempted to bomb a jetliner with a bomb hidden in his underwear as the plane prepared to land near Detroit, and Nidal Malik Hasan, who massacred 13 people in 2009 at Fort Hood, Tex. — as an example of how Birthright Citizenship has the potential to benefit enemies of the United States.
Awlaki was born on April 22,1971 in Las Cruces, N.M. to non-immigrant parents while his father was studying as a foreign student in the United States. He left the United States with his parents when they returned to Yemen but later re-entered the United States, using his American passport, where he became spiritual mentor to several of the 9/11 hijackers before returning to Yemen and becoming a senior al-Qaeda operative. Awlaki was killed in a U.S. drone strike on Sept. 30, 2011.
The Birthright Citizenship Act, H.R. 140, would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act – not the Constitution – to consider a person born in the United States “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States for citizenship at birth purposes if the person is born in the United States of parents, one of whom is: (1) a U.S. citizen or national; (2) a lawful permanent resident alien whose residence is in the United States; or (3) an alien performing active service in the U.S. Armed Forces.
Having read CROmnibus: a $1 Trillion Betrayal; Updated [posted by Socialism is not the Answer ] http://socialismisnottheanswer.wordpress.com/2014/12/14/cromnibus-a-1-trillion-betrayal-updated/
I was motivated to make this video -
If you like this, please use the live link to his site on my sidebar.
on October 3, 2014 at 4:13 pm
Liberalism is a liability to America. Period. Their denial is dangerous, and their political correctness is an agent for the ruin of our republic. Going postal is turning into going Islamic. I’m sure Melissa Harris Perry would disagree. Hear more in this ZoNation!
Read more at http://alfonzorachel.com/2130/liberals-headin-rawng-road#TBOGzp3pZGzK5BFp.99
Six years ago, I ventured out of my safe, cozy, JibJab site; (It succumbed in Dec ’08) and joined the fight under the pseudonym that I retain to this day. I had a very brief, and totally disgusting stay at Facebook; it took smashgods.com to rid me of them, as their custom was to make a site “dormant” but didn’t allow you to delete it through regular channels.
Note – if you need to know how much of a trail you have left on the Wild,Wild,Web, the URL is:
Subsequently, there has been more than enough evidence on that reprehensible (and too damn popular) site, for anyone with a spinal column to put up with their ratbag attitude.
*SIGH* So much for wishful thinking…
Now this double-minded social site has once again exposed its disingenuous self. Read, and please rethink your position if you still maintain a presence there. “X”
While the First Amendment would seem to protect your right to show love for the Second, it’s not always the case.
Facebook has some pretty strict policies when it comes to talking about firearms.
And a North Carolina gun store is learning that even if you’re trying to educate people about guns to keep them safe, that’s too much Second Amendment for Facebook. According to WSCO TV:
The Hyatt Gun Shop in Charlotte recently posted the ad online for a Veterans Day sale on safes and vaults.
Owner Larry Hyatt told WSOC-TV the ad was posted because the store didn’t feel like it violated Facebook’s policy on banning ads for weapons.
Facebook said ads cannot indirectly link back to pages where guns can be purchased.
The social media giant said the ad violated the policy and wrote, “The decision is final. Please consider this the end of our correspondence about your ad.”
Well, how about that?
While Facebook banned the ad because it linked back to a site where you could buy guns, all the store was trying to do was promote reasonable and sensible gun safety.
While liberals always jabber away about how there needs to be tougher gun laws, you and I both know gun laws don’t keep guns out of people’s hands.
But safes can and do.
It’s Facebook’s prerogative to ban the ad, that’s up to them.
The sad thing is Facebook is the #2 website in the world. That means their stance on guns influences how many people all over the U.S. feel about guns.
Fortunately, Facebook isn’t the government, and it’s a good thing people can still talk about guns and share gun pictures and videos on the popular site.
And while you can’t post ads that link to a place where guns are sold, one thing you can do right now is learn how to build an off the books AR-15…
A wife commented, “When we were first married you took the small piece of steak and gave me the larger. You don’t love me any more…”
“Nonsense darling,” replied the husband. “You cook better now.”
Courtesy of Darla Dawald – Original post picture of Boehner replaced by me, it was too flattering for this Rino invertebrate.
Please note the live link in my header for the Precinct Project.
Excerpt from this post: Precinct committeemen elect State Committeemen and State Committeemen elect your state party leadership. These people are responsible for deciding who goes forward on the ballet. They steer your state’s party.
At least 50% of the PC slots are empty nationwide.
PC make connections with like minded voters in their precinct
PC’s elect State Committeemen who in turn elect State Party Leadership
Who decide who goes forward on ballets and control the state party direction